Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4942 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942
Con.Case(C).No.1443 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 40199/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 40199/2017 DATED 26-03-2018 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC
JOSEPH JOHN
MONIPILLIL HOUSE, AVOLY P.O,ANICADU,
MUVATTUPUZHA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.JOMY GEORGE
KUM.N.R.ATHIRA
SMT.M.V.BABY
SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN
SMT.A.MINI JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7 IN WPC:
1 A. KOWSIBAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -
695033.
2 SWAMINATHAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.H.CIRCLE,
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,KOTTAYAM - 686002.
3 MADHU
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.H.CIRCLE,
PATHANAMTHITTA,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
THIRUVALLA - 689101.
4 PRAKASHAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H.
CIRCLE, PALAKKAD - 678001.
5 P. USHA
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER,EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER
2
Con.Case(C).No.1443 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 40199/2017
AUTHORITY,PROJECT DIVISION, KALMANDAPAM,
PALAKKAD - 678001.
6 SAJEEV
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER
AUTHORITY,
PROJECT DIVISION,ADOOR - 691523.
7 JOACHAN JOSEPH
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER
AUTHORITY,
PROJECT DIVISION, KOTTAYAM - 686002.
SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KWA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
3
Con.Case(C).No.1443 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 40199/2017
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 10th day of February 2021
This contempt petition is filed complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment in
W.P.(C)No.40199/2017 dated 26.03.2018 is not
complied with.
2. However, today when the matter is taken up,
learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the directions are complied with. Therefore, I do
not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any
further.
The Contempt of Court case is closed,
accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE Hmh
Con.Case(C).No.1443 OF 2018(S) IN WP(C). 40199/2017
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JDUGMENT DATED 26.03.2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C)NO.40199/2017
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!