Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4873 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.26 OF 2021(C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC 54/2019 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT &
SESSIONS COURT - IV, PALAKKAD
CRIME NO.18/2018 OF Kongad Police Station , Palakkad
PETITIONERS:
1 PRAVEEN BABU
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O. VISWANATHAN, PATTATHODY HOUSE, MANIKKASSERY
P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2 VIPIN
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. VISWANATHAN, PATTATHODY HOUSE, MANIKKASSERY
P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3 JINU @ VINU
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O. LAKSHMANAN, THEKKEKARA HOUSE, KOLPADAM,
MANIKKASSERY P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 031.
2 RAMESH M.R.
AGED 31 YEARS
S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, MALAMPADAM HOUSE, MANIKKASSERY
P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 631.
R2 BY ADV. SEBIN SEBASTIAN
PP-SRI.T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crmc 26/2021 2
V.G.ARUN, J.
===========================
Crl.M.C.No.26 of 2021
===========================
Dated this the 10th day of February, 2021
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.18 of 2018
registered at the Kongad Police Station for offences punishable
under Sections 341, 323, 324, 506(ii), 308 r/w 34 of IPC, now
pending as S.C.No.54 of 2019 on the file of Additional District
and Sessions Court-IV, Palakkad. The de facto complainant at
whose instance the crime was registered is the 2 nd respondent.
Annexure B affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent stating
that the dispute has been settled and that he has no subsisting
grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged,
nature of the injury caused and having perused the affidavit filed
by the 2nd respondent, the contents of which are submitted to be
true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute is settled and
that no public interest is involved in this matter. Moreover, in
view of the settlement, possibility of the criminal proceedings
ending in conviction is remote. As such, continuance of the
proceedings will amount to an abuse of process of court and
hence, in view of the legal position set out by the Honourable
Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
[(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and
another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no impediment in
granting the relief sought.
4. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
S.C.No.54 of 2019 on the file of Additional District and Sessions
Court-IV, Palakkad is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
lgk
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A PHOTOCOPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.18/2018 OF KONGAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
ANNEXURE B THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEFORE HER ADVOCATE AT PALAKKAD, DATED 17.2.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!