Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shahul Hameed vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 4199 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4199 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Shahul Hameed vs The District Collector on 4 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

                                  &

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

    THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 15TH MAGHA,1942

                       WP(C).No.2084 OF 2021(I)


PETITIONERS:

      1        SHAHUL HAMEED, AGED 51 YEARS
               S/O.ABDUL LATHEEF, RESIDING AT FATHIMA MANZIL,
               ZAKKARIYA WARD, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 012.

      2        SHAJI, AGED 47 YEARS,
               S/O.UMMEN SEETHY, RESIDING AT NADUVELEPRAMPU,
               CIVIL STATION WARD ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 012.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR
               SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFFI
               SRI.SHAHIM BIN AZIZ

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
               COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION,
               ALAPPUZHA, PIN- 688 001.

      2        MUNICIPALITY OF ALAPPUZHA
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
               MUNICIPAL OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 001.

      3        STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
               ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION,
               ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688001.

      4        THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
               REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
               VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682 018.

      5        ALAPPUZHA MUGHAM PARIPALANA SANGAM REG.NO.528/99
               ZACHARIA BAZAR, ALAPPUZHA,
               REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PIN - 688 012.
 WP(C).No.2084 OF 2021(I)


                                              2



               6           P.K.MOHAMMED BADUSHA SAKHAFI,
                           AGED 52 YEARS, RELIGIOUS TEACHER,
                           S/O.KADARKUTTY, KOTHIPANACKAL PULLUVELIL,
                           ERAMALLOOR MURI, EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA,
                           GENERAL SECRETARY OF ALAPPUZHA,
                           MUGHAM PARIPALANA SANGAM,
                           REG.NO.528/99, ZACHARIA BAZAR,
                           ALAPPUZHA, PIN- 688 012.

                           R4 BY ADV. SHRI.T.K.SAIDALIKUTTY, SC, WAQF BOARD

                           SRI. N,K. THANKACHAN-SR. G.P.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.2084 OF 2021(I)


                                                         3



                                                      JUDGMENT

Shaffique, J

This writ petition had been filed, inter alia , seeking for a

direction to respondents 1, 2 and 4 to ensure that no

construction activities are carried out by respondents 5 and

6 in the Alappuzha Mukham Masjid Waqf Properties

registered under the Kerala State Waqf Board. It is brought

to our notice that as per judgment dated 15.11.2017 in

CRP(WAKF) No.170/2017, this Court had issued certain

directions to respondents 5 & 6 not to undertake any

reconstruction or construction in the waqf property without

obtaining necessary permission from the Waqf Board, local

authority and District Collector.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite

the said direction, without getting any permission,

construction is being made. Being aggrieved, the petitioner

informed the matter to the police and also to the Waqf

Board, but he still apprehends that they may proceed with

the construction in the Waqf Property mentioned as above.

3. Apparently, this is a dispute of Civil nature and there is no

reason for this Court to interfere in the matter at this stage. WP(C).No.2084 OF 2021(I)

If at all the petitioner requires any further directions in

regard to any construction being made in the Waqf

properties without permission, it shall be open for the

petitioner to approach the Civil Court or the Waqf Tribunal,

seeking appropriate directions. We do not think that there

is any necessity for this Court to interfere in the matter.

Reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the

competent Authority/forum, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE

sd/-

GOPINATH P., JUDGE AMV/05/02/2021 WP(C).No.2084 OF 2021(I)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.R.P.(WAQF) NO.170/2017.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE DYSP OF ALAPPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL

TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter