Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3963 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 14TH MAGHA,1942
OP(C).No.731 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.02.2020 IN E.P.NO.36 OF 2019 IN
O.S.NO.166/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR
PETITIONERS:
1 SAIDALI,
AGED 72 YEARS,
S/O. MOHAMMAD HAJI, PAINGAL HOUSE,
KATTIPPARUTHY, VALANCHERY P.O, PIN 676 552,
TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2 NAJUMUDEEN,
AGED 42 YEARS,
S/O. SAIDALI, PAINGAL HOUSE, KATTIPPARUTHY,
VALANCHERY P.O, PIN 676 552, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
3 SHERIF ALIAS SHERI,
AGED 39 YEARS,
S/O. SAIDALI, PAINGAL HOUSE, KATTIPPARUTHY,
VALANCHERY P.O, PIN 676 552, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
4 SHADIA,
AGED 37 YEARS,
D/O. SAIDALI, PAINGAL HOUSE, KATTIPPARUTHY,
VALANCHERY P.O, PIN 676 552, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.JAYADEEP MENON
SRI.T.P.RAMESH (THENGUMPILLIL)
SMT.P.KRISHNAPRIYA
SMT.SUSMITHA K.
RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDER & JUDGMENT DEBTOR IN THE ABOVE
CASE:
1 SABEEB RAHMAN,
AGED 29 YEARS,
S/O. BAVA, KUNNATH HOUSE, KATTIPPARUTHY,
VAIKKATHOOR DESOM, PIN 676 552, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
O.P.(C)No.731/2020
-:2:-
2 MOHAMMAD SHAFI,
AGED 44 YEARS,
S/O. SAIDALI, PAINGAL HOUSE, KATTIPPARUTHY,
VALANCHERY P.O, PIN 676 552, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
R1 BY ADV. SHRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR
R2 BY ADVS.SHRI.VINEETH.K.MOHANAN
SHRI.JINS.P.JOHN
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
03.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
O.P.(C)No.731/2020
-:3:-
Dated this the 3rd day of February,2021
J U D G M E N T
The impugned order arises from E.P.No.36/2019
in O.S.No.166/2014 on the file of the Munsiff
Court, Tirur.
2. Being aggrieved by the order refusing to
set aside sale conducted, a third party to the
proceeding filed this original petition. It is
submitted all persons concerned and interested in
the auctioned property settled the issues as
between them by filing a joint statement executed
between them before the court below. A copy of the
joint statement dated 11.01.2021 was also produced
before this Court.
3. In view of the joint statement having
been filed by parties which the court below has no
reason to refuse to accept, the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioners in this proceedings
submitted that he does not propose to further
pursue this matter.
O.P.(C)No.731/2020
In the result, this original petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
All pending interlocutory applications will
stand closed.
Sd/-
T.V.ANILKUMAR,JUDGE
DST //True copy/
P.A.To Judge
O.P.(C)No.731/2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SETTLEMENT
DEED NO 2914/2001 OF S.R.O KUTTIPURAM DATED 30-10-2001.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AWARD DATED 09-07-2016 OF THE LOK ADALATH IN O.S NO. 166/2014 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, TIRUR
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION NO. 36/2019 IN O.S NO. 166/2014 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, TIRUR DATED 18-01-2019.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE PROCLAMATION AND SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY WITH AFFIDAVIT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN FILED IN E.P NO. 36/2019 IN O.S NO. 166/2014 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, TIRUR DATED 05-09-2019.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!