Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Haripriya vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 3665 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3665 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
S.Haripriya vs State Of Kerala on 2 February, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 13TH MAGHA,1942

                       WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)


PETITIONER:

               S.HARIPRIYA, UPPER DIVISION CLERK,
               STATE INSTITUTE OF LANGUAGES(KERALA),NALANDA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003.

               SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY
               SRI.S.A.ANAND
               SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA
               SRI.K.A.BALAN
               SRI.S.DEEPAK
               SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO
               SMT.K.N.REMYA
               SMT.N.SANTHA
               SRI.V.VARGHESE

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
               GOVERNMENT,CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT,
               SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.

      2        STATE INSTITUTE OF LANGUAGES (KERALA)
               REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,NALANDA,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 003.

      3        DIRECTOR, STATE INSTITUTE OF LANGUAGES (KERALA),
               NALANDA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 003.

               SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC.
               SMT. REKHA C NAIR - SR.GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD         ON
02.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)

                                     2


                               JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of February 2021

The petitioner, who is working as an Upper Division

Clerk in the services of the State Institute of Languages

(Kerala), Thiruvananthapuram (for short, 'the Institute') has

approached this Court seeking that the resolution adopted by

it in Ext.P5 - namely, that a vacancy available in the cadre of

Editorial Assistant be filled up by one of the permanent staff

in the Institute having requisite qualification, be directed to

be implemented, especially since this has been taken at the

highest level by its Governing Body, of which the Chief

Minister of Kerala is the Chairman.

2. The petitioner says that even though the Institute had

taken this decision, no follow up action had been taken by it

even though Exts.P10 and P11 had been forwarded to the

Government. The petitioner, therefore, prays that the second

respondent be directed to immediately appoint her, subject to

verification of qualification, asserting that she is fully entitled

to be so considered.

3. In response, Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing

counsel for the second respondent - Institute, submitted that WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)

a counter affidavit has been placed on record, wherein, it has

been clearly shown that the petitioner, being an Upper

Division Clerk, is not in the feeder category for being

considered for promotion to the post of Editorial Assistant.

He submitted that, therefore, she cannot claim any right to

seek that she be considered for appointment to the said post,

particularly when the Special Rules applicable to the Institute

make it very clear that there can be no violation of the Feeder

Category Rules. He, therefore, prays that this writ petition be

dismissed.

4. When I consider the afore submissions, it is without

doubt that the specific case of the petitioner is that Ext.P5 has

been issued by the second respondent - Institute invoking its

powers under Rule 2(19) of the General and Subordinate

Service Rules 1984 which is applicable to it. As per this Rule,

subject to the approval by Government, the Governing Body is

empowered to modify the Rules as may be required from time

to time and to interpret them in the case of doubt. The

petitioner asserts that, through Ext.P5, what has been done

by the Institute is to invoke Rule 2(19) and to allow the

appointment of qualified permanent staff to the post of

Editorial Assistant, in modification of the stipulations relating WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)

to the feeder category.

5. However, what is pertinent in this case is that, even if

I am to assume that Ext.P5 has been issued by the Institute

invoking the provisions of Rule 2(19) of the General and

Subordinate Service Rules, it requires approval by the

Government and in the absence of such, I do not think that

the petitioner could be justified in seeking that she be

directed to be appointed immediately.

6. I am, therefore, of the firm view that the petitioner

must invoke her alternative remedies by approaching the

Government or the Institute appropriately, to ensure that

Ext.P5 obtains the concurrence of the former in terms of law

and within the mandate of Rule 2(19) of the aforementioned

Rules.

Reserving the afore liberty, I close this writ petition

without any further orders; however, permitting the petitioner

to approach this Court again, if it becomes so warranted in

future.




                                         Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     Stu                                          JUDGE
 WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)





                                  APPENDIX
     PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

     EXHIBIT P1            TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)N0.9/2000/CAD
                           DATED 07.03.2000.

     EXHIBIT P2            TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1/721/99/SIL

DATED 15.01.2003 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NO.E1/921/2012/SIL DATED 31.05.2012 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BIO DATA OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE INSTITUTE HELD ON 15.12.2014.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.E1/237/2015/SIL DATED 20.04.2015 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE UO NOTE NO.E1/237/2015/SIL DATED 15.07.2015 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1/2673/2013/SIL(1) DATED 30.06.2015 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.08.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT LETTER NO.6745/C1/15/CAD DATED 30.09.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT LETTER NO.6745/C1/15/CAD DATED 15.12.2015.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1/58/2013/SIL DATED 29.02.2016 OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE WP(C).No.2922 OF 2017(M)

INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.09.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE.

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E4/CERT/VERIFICATION/2017/754 DATED 25/3/2017 OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS.

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.SE/VD/0380/2017 DATED 18/2/2017 OF THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SIKKIM MANIPAL UNIVERSITY

EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.IG/SED/DEGREE CELL/VERIF./17/15206 DATED 11/5/2017 OF THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY OF INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY

EXHIBIT P17 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.CE/CONV/GEN/SL 11527/61 DATED 3/4/2017 OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS OF BHARATIDASAN UNIVERSITY, TAMIL NADU

EXHIBIT P18 TRUE COPY OF THE GENUINENESS CERTIFICATE NO.6316 DATED 15/3/2017 OF ALAGAPPA UNIVERSITY, TAMIL NADU.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter