Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govindankutty vs Chief Conservator Of Forest And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3491 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3491 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Govindankutty vs Chief Conservator Of Forest And ... on 1 February, 2021
WP(C).No.38837 OF 2018(D)
                                  1

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

    MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942

                      WP(C).No.38837 OF 2018(D)


PETITIONER/S:

      1         GOVINDANKUTTY
                AGED 57 YEARS
                S/O.GOPALAN, ERUKULAM, CHULANNUR P.O.,
                PERUNGOTTUKURISSI VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
                DISTRICT, PIN-678574.

      2         BHASKARAN,
                AGED 62 YEARS
                S/O.GOPALAN, ERUKULAM, CHULANNUR P.O.,
                PERUNGOTTUKURISSI VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD
                DISTRICT, PIN-678574.

                BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND CUSTODIAN,
                EASTERN CIRCLE, OLAVAKKODE P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
                PIN-678002.

      2         DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER,
                DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICE, NEMMARA, PALAKKAD
                DISTRICT. 678001

                R1-2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

OTHER PRESENT:

                SPL GP SRI.SANDESH RAJA.K

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.38837 OF 2018(D)
                                               2




                                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of February 2021

The Writ Petition is filed complaining that Exts.P1 and P2

orders passed by the Forest Tribunal, Palakkad are not

implemented by restoring the land covered by those orders to the

petitioners. The 2nd petitioner is the applicant in the O.A which

resulted in Ext P1. He approached the respondent for releasing

the land covered by Ext.P1 order. Sri.Gopalan, who is the father

of both the petitioners was the applicant in the O.A which

resulted in Ext.P2 Order. Petitioners claim release of the land

covered by Ext.P2 order on the strength of Ext.P3 partition

deed.

2. The 2nd respondent has filed a statement. It is stated

that the applicant in O.A.No.916/75 passed away on 06.11.1993.

Though the 2nd respondent had directed the successors of the

deceased Applicant to produce the death certificate and legal

heirship certificate, as per letter dated 10.09.2014, they have

not so far produced the legal heirship certificate; they

produced the death certificate alone of the deceased Applicant

on 30.10.2017. It is stated that as and when the legal heirship

certificate is produced appropriate action would be taken for

releasing the 1.44 acres of land covered by O.A.No.916/75

(Ext.P2). It is also stated that there are some discrepancies in WP(C).No.38837 OF 2018(D)

the extent of land available in the field and the land claimed

by the OA applicant, steps are taken for execution of an

indemnity certificate and that on completion of the legal

formalities appropriate action would be taken for issuing NOC.

This is recorded.

3. In respect of the land in survey No.75/2 covered by

Ext.P1 order in OA No.907/75, it is stated that Assistant

Director, Forest Mini Survey, Kozhikkode has, as per letter

dated 05.05.2018 informed that the survey of the land was

included in the priority list of the year 2018. However the

survey is yet to be undertaken.

Therefore, there shall be a direction to the Assistant

Director, Forest Mini Survey, Kozhikkode to conduct the survey

of the land in Survey No.75/2 covered by Ext.P1 order in

O.A.No.907/75 and furnish the survey sketch to the 2 nd respondent

within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy

of the judgment. On receipt of the said sketch, the 2 nd

respondent shall take steps for releasing the land to the 2nd

petitioner who is the applicant in O.A.No.907/1975, within a

further period of two months.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

                                                               P.V.ASHA

rkc                                                              JUDGE
 WP(C).No.38837 OF 2018(D)




                            APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1           TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/8/1977 IN
                     OA NO.907/1975.

EXHIBIT P2           TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/8/1977 IN
                     OA NO.916/1975.

EXHIBIT P3           TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO.

1228/1999 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, ALATHUR.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT VERIFICATION REPORT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter