Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anilkumar Palathinkal vs Kitex Garments Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 3487 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3487 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Anilkumar Palathinkal vs Kitex Garments Ltd on 1 February, 2021
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

     MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942

                         OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMA 2/2020 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR


PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

             ANILKUMAR PALATHINKAL
             AGED 59 YEARS
             S/O.LATE P.U. GEORGE,
             PALATHINKAL HOUSE, PROPRIETOR,
             M/S.VIRGO AGENCIES,
             PALATHINKAL BUILDING, NORTH FORT GATE,
             TRIPUNITHURA, KANAYANNUR TALUK,
             ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

             BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

             KITEX GARMENTS LTD
             REGISTERED OFFICE AT KIZHAKKAMBALAM,
             KIZHAKKALAM VILLAGE,
             KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,
             REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND
             ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER,
             SAJEEV KOSHY, AGED 58 YEARS PIN- 683 503

             R1 BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE
             R1 BY ADV. SHRI.JUDY JOSE
             R1 BY ADV. SMT.URMILA ZACHARIA

     THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.02.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

                                       2


                                 JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of February 2021

The petitioner herein suffered an ex-parte

decree in OS.No.360/2014 on the file of the Munsiff

Court, Perumbavoor. The respondent/plaintiff was

found entitled to realize a sum of Rs.2,62,500/-

with 12% interest from 22.12.2010 till the date of

the decree and thereafter with 6% interest till its

realization. The respondent/plaintiff was also

found entitled to costs in the suit.

2. The petitioner filed an application for

setting aside the ex-parte decree and an

application to condone the delay in filing the

application to set aside the ex-parte decree which

came to be dismissed. The petitioner therefore

preferred CMA.No.2/2020 before the Subordinate

Judges Court, Perumbavoor and the same is pending.

3. It appears that certain property of the

petitioner was ordered to be conditionally attached

in an application for attachment before judgment in OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

OS.No.360/2014. It is submitted that the property

which was subject matter of the attachment has

subsequently been acquired for the purposes of the

Kochi Metro and that an amount of Rs.13,67,769/-

under Ext.P9 award and Rs.8,78,274/- under Ext.P10

award have been deposited by the Kochi Metro.

4. The learned counsel submits that since the

amount which has been decreed in OS.No.360/2014 is

only Rs.2,62,500/- together with interest and

costs, no prejudice will caused to the respondent,

if the petitioner is permitted to deposit an amount

to cover the decree debt on condition that he will

be permitted to withdraw the amounts deposited by

Kochi Metro towards acquisition cost in respect of

the land belonging to the petitioner.

5. The learned counsel for the respondent would

however submit that though the petitioner's

application for setting aside the ex-parte decree

was dismissed by the Munsiff Court, since he has

challenged that order by filing an appeal before OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

the Subordinate Judges Court, Perumbavoor and if

the ex-parte decree is set aside, the decree will

have to be modified as the date of the decree will

then change, in which case, he will be entitled to

interest at the contractual rate at least till the

date of the decree.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can

be permitted to withdraw the amounts deposited as

compensation for land acquisition in terms of

Exts.P9 and P10 on the petitioner depositing a sum

of Rs. 7 lakhs before the Munsiff Court,

Perumbavoor (court which passed the decree in

OS.No.360/2014). It is suggested by counsel on both

sides that the petitioner can be required to make

the deposit by opening a Fixed Deposit in a

nationalized Bank or in Government Treasury and by

producing original of the receipt along with the

lien marked in favour of the Munsiff court,

Perumbavoor, before that court. It is therefore OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

ordered that if the petitioner makes a deposit of

Rs.7 Lakhs either in a Fixed Deposit in a

nationalized Bank or before the Government Treasury

and produces the receipt together with a lien

marked in favour of Munsiff Court Perumbavoor,

before that Court, the petitioner will be permitted

to withdraw the amounts deposited in his name under

Exts.P9 and P10 if necessary by lifting the order

of conditional attachment. The petitioner

undertakes that the Fixed Deposit will be renewed

from time to time until the matter is finally

decided by the Munsiff Court or any appellate

Court.

The Original Petition will stand disposed of as

above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE

Sn OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 25.8.2014.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT APPLICATION FILED AS I.A.NO.1955/2014 IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 25.8.2014

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE IN O.S. NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 25.8.2014

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 29.10.2014

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION AS I.A.NO.146/2017 IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DT. 11.1.2017

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION AS I.A.NO.147/2017 IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DT. 11.1.2017

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.146/2017 IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DT. 27.7.2019

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.147/2017 IN O.S.NO.360/2014 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DT. 27.7.2019

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO.193/2019-A PASSED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) NO.1, KOCHI METRO RAIL PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU DATED 23.9.2019 OP(C).No.228 OF 2021

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO.193/2019-B PASSED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) NO.1, KOCHI METRO RAIL PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU DATED 23.9.2019

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE E.P.FILED AS E.P.NO.243/2015 BEFORE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 29.7.2015

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A.NO.3/2020 IN CMA NO.2/2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 30.11.2020

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

Sn

//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter