Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 24016 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
SATURDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
M.A.C.A. NO.2785 OF 2019
(AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 19.3.2019 IN OP(MV)No.690/2017 OF
ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-II, THODUPUZHA)
APPELLANT/CLAIMANT:
ROSHY GEORGE, AGED 10 YEARS (MINOR),
S/O.GEORGE @ ROY JOSEPH, PLAKOOTTATHIL HOUSE,
PUTHADI P. O., SANTHANPARA VILLAGE, IDUKKI
DISTRICT, MINOR REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL
GUARDIAN ANCY CHACKO.
BY ADVS.
SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP
SMT.T.MANASY
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
THE MANAGER,
SREERAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
AZAD TOWER, 1ST FLOOR, AMMANKOVIL CROSS ROAD,
ERNAKULAM - 682 035.
SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MACA No.2785 of 2019
2
JUDGMENT
(Dated :18th December, 2021)
The appellant was the petitioner in OP (MV) No.690
of 2017 on the file of the Additional Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal-II, Thodupuzha. The respondents in the
appeal were the respondents before the Tribunal. The
claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
2. The short facts, relevant for the determination
of the appeal are; on 04.04.2015 at 2.40 p.m., at
Iringol at Aluva - Moonnar Road, a Chevrolet Tavera car
bearing Registration No:KL-32 B/18 met with accident
with a KSRTC Bus bearing Registration No.KL-15/8028. The
1st and 2nd respondents remained ex-parte. The 3 rd
respondent being the manager of the Insurance Company
filed a written statement contending that the accident
occurred due the negligence of the driver of the KSRTC
bus. The Tribunal found that the accident happened due MACA No.2785 of 2019
to the negligence of the driver of the 1 st
respondent/driver of the Tavera car. The petitioner is
an 8 year old boy. He was admitted at MOSC Medical
College Hospital at Kozhencherry on 2.4.2015 and
discharged on 6.4.2015. He had contusion on right knee
only. On the basis of the documents produced, the
Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.17,640/- with
interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Aggrieved by the
said award, this appeal is filed.
3. On going through the award of the Tribunal, it
can be seen that, the Tribunal has granted fair and just
compensation on all heads. The counsel for the
appellant/petitioner submitted that though a claim for
pain and suffering was R.1,00,000/-, only Rs.5,000/- was
given.
4. As per the disability certificate and treatment
certificate, it is seen that there was only a contusion
on right knee and the Tribunal has granted Rs.5,000/- as
compensation for pain and suffering. Being a child of 8 MACA No.2785 of 2019
years and admitted in hospital for 2 days with pain, I
am inclined to grant Rs.15,000/- towards pain and
suffering. He has already granted Rs.5,000/- by the
Tribunal. So the balance amount will come to
Rs.10,000/-.
In the result, the appeal is allowed and the
appellant/petitioner is entitled for enhanced
compensation of Rs.10,000/- with interest at the rate of
9%. I make it clear that, the 3 rd respondent/insurer is
ordered to deposit the enhanced compensation with
interest and costs before the Tribunal within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this judgment. The Tribunal shall disburse the
enhanced compensation to the appellant/petitioner in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE
ss
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!