Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23965 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
Monday, the 13th day of December 2021 / 22nd Agrahayana, 1943
MAT.APPEAL NO. 791 OF 2020
OP 1134/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT:
C.S.SASIDHARAN, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.K.V.CHAKRAPANI, SOUPARNIKA,
KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM 686 608, NOW RESIDING AT
CHAVAKKATTUKUZHI HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU,
VAIKOM 686 605
BY ADVS.A.BALAGOPALAN, M.N.MANMADAN,M.S.IMTHIYAZ
AHAMMED, P.SEENA, VISWANATH SALISH, RALITZINE MENDEZ
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7:
1. SUSEELA SASIDHARAN, AGED 71 YEARS, W/O.C.S.SASIDHARAN, SOUPARNIKA,
KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM 686 608.
2. SREELATHA, AGED 55 YEARS, D/O.CHEKKUTTY, KUNNATH PUTHENVEEDU, HOUSE
NO.48/773, BEYPORE P.O., KOZHIKODE 673 015.
3. MONOR SREESANKAR SASIDHARAN, AGED 10 YEARS, S/O.SASIDHARAN, KUNNATH
PUTHENVEEDU, HOUSE NO.48/773, BEYPORE P.O., KOZHIKODE: 15
REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SREELATHA AGED 55
YEARS,D/O.CHEKKUTTY, KUNNATH PUTHENVEEDU, HOUSE NO.48/773, BEYPORE
P.O., KOZHIKODE: 673 015
4. PRAKASHINI, AGED 75 YEARS, W/O.DAMODARAN, ASWATHY NIVAS,
BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VAIKOM 686 605
5. CHANDRAHASAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.CHAKRAPANI, CHAVAKKATTUKUZHI
(MUTTATHIL) HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VAIKOM 686
605
6. K.V.CHAKRAPANI, AGED 99 YEARS, S/O.VAVA, CHAVAKKATTUKUZHI
(MUTTATHIL) HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VAIKOM 686
605
7. DAMODARAN, AGED 79 YEARS, S/O.LATE KUNJU ASWATHY NIVAS,
BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, VAIKOM 686 605
BY ADVS.T.N.JAYADEVAN,K.S.BABU, MINU SIBY ROY AND BABU SHANKAR FOR
RESPONDENT NO.1
This Matrimonial appeal having come up for orders on 13.12.2021 upon
perusing this courts order dated 2/12/2020 and 4/03/2021 inIA 1/2020, the
court on the same day passed the following:
P.T.O.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE &
SOPHY THOMAS, JJ.
------------------------------------
Mat. Appeal No.791 of 2020
------------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of December, 2021
ORDER
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
In this appeal, there is an order of status quo. That is
being continued. It is to be noted that, one of the reliefs
granted to the respondents is as against forcible eviction of the
1st respondent from the house in item No.1 and from causing
obstruction to her possession of item No.1 to 4.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for respondents
that, on the strength of status quo order, 1st respondent has
been thrown out. This has been denied by the learned counsel
for the appellant.
3. Anyway, we make it clear that the status quo order
will not cover relief (c) granted in the impugned judgment.
Post the matter in usual course, along with Mat.Appeal
No.805 of 2020. Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE smp 13-12-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!