Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17292 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 3655 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
MOHAMED RASHID M.P.
AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMED RASHID M.P.
MANNOOPARAMBIL HOUSE, CODACAL P.O., THIRUNAVAYA AMSOM,
TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676108
BY ADVS.
MOHAMED RASHID M.P.(Party-In-Person)
NOUSHAD E.
RESPONDENTS:
1 FATHIMA K.
AGED 29 YEARS, D/O. HAMZA HAJI,
KAVUMPURATH HOUSE, KURUKA P.O., KALPAKANCHERY AMSOM,
TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676551
2 AISHA DIYANA M.P.
AGED 4 YEARS, KAVUMPURATH HOUSE, KURUKA P.O.,
KALPAKANCHERY AMSOM, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICTPIN - 676551
(MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER FATHIMA K., 1ST
RESPONDENT )
3 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANAKULAM,PIN - 682031
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C. No.3655/2021 -2-
ORDER
This Crl.M.C. has been filed seeking a direction to the Family Court, Tirur
to release the Passport of the petitioner. The petitioner is admittedly in arrears
of payment of maintenance which was directed to be paid in the manner
indicated in the judgment of this court in R.P (FC) No.120/2019. The learned
counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount of arrears is Rs.98,500/-.
This is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 & 2. The
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unless his Passport is released, he
will not be in a position to rejoin his job in the United Arab Emirates and if he
does not rejoin his employment he will not be in a position to pay any amount of
maintenance to respondents 1 & 2. The learned counsel for respondents 1 & 2
stoutly opposed the prayer of release of Passport stating that if the Passport is
given before the arrears are deposited, the petitioner will not pay any amount
towards the arrears of maintenance. The learned counsel for the petitioner
would reply that his commitment to pay all arrears of maintenance can be
ensured by making provision for providing valuable security.
2. In the overall facts and circumstances of the case I am of the opinion
that no purpose will be served by not permitting the petitioner to rejoin his
employment. However that must not result in failure to comply with the
directions issued by this court in R.P (FC) No.120/2019. Therefore this Crl. M.C.
is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The petitioner shall deposit an amount of equivalent to 50% of the
arrears of maintenance due in terms of the judgment of this court in R.P (FC)
No.120/2019 within a period of one month from today.
(ii) The petitioner shall provide valuable security of either immovable
property or other valuable security for securing the payment of arrears of
maintenance due under the judgment of this court in R.P (FC) No.120/2019.
(iii) The petitioner shall file an affidavit undertaking to pay the balance of
the arrears of maintenance on or before 31-12-2021.
3. On the aforesaid conditions being satisfied, the Passport of the
petitioner which is now in the custody of the Family Court, Tirur shall be
released to him. It is made clear that any deposit of arrears of maintenance, shall
on proper application, be released to the 1st respondent.
The undertaking of the petitioner to continue payment of the maintenance
for the future period is recorded.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
AMG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!