Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Santhosh Kumar vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 17282 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17282 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Santhosh Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 17 August, 2021
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
     TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1943
                     WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
           SANTHOSH KUMAR,AGED 42 YEARS
           S/O. SUBBA BELCHADA BAJAL, BAJAL HOUSE,
           PAVOOR P.O., MANJESHWAR, KASARAGOD.

          BY ADVS.
          R.SUNIL KUMAR
          A.SALINI LAL
          ARUN KRISHNA


RESPONDENTS:
     1     STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
           KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
           GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

    2     KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
          REPRESENTED BY THE PROJECT DIRECTOR,
          KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT, JAGAD BUILDINGS,
          KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.

    3     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
          PWD ROADS DIVISION, BEACH ROAD, KASARAGOD-671123.

    4     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
          KASARAGOD DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KASARAGOD-671121.

    5     BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER,
          CALICUT TERRITORY, 3RD FLOOR, CEEKAY TOWERS,
          VANDIPETTA, KANNUR ROAD, NADAKKAVU WEST,
          CALICUT-673011.

          BY SR.GP SRI.S.RAJMOHAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021                   ..2..




                                JUDGMENT

In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the

non-consideration of the request for 'No Objection Certificate

(NOC)' by the the District Collector, the authority under Rule 144

of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 on the basis of objection by the

officers of the Public Works Department (PWD) relying on

Government Orders viz. G.O. (Ms)No.16/2020/PWD dated

10.02.2020 (Ext.P4) and G.O.(Ms)No.67/2020/PWD 16.10.2020

(Ext.P5). The petitioner also prays for direction to issue NOC to

the petitioner's site notwithstanding objection of the neighbours.

2. Regarding insistence on condition to produce NOC from

PWD while granting NOC by the district authorities, recently, in a

batch of writ petitions (W.P(C) No.9881/2020 & connected cases)

filed by Oil Marketing Companies and various

Franchisees selected by them, challenging the non-grant of /

rejection of application for issuing NOCs by the district

authorities, for establishing Petroleum Fuel Retail Outlets in

various places in Kerala as contemplated under Rule 144 of the WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021 ..3..

Petroleum Rules, 2002, this Court has passed a judgment on

05.08.2021, wherein this Court quashed the aforesaid

Government Orders dated 10.02.2020 and 16.10.2020 and

declared that, insisting on a condition to produce NOC from

PWD while granting NOC by the district authorities is null and

void. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted

hereunder:-

"54. In view of findings and conclusions made hereinabove, this Court find it unnecessary to decide other issues agitated in these Writ Petitions. The writ petitions filed by Oil Marketing Companies and their Franchisees are therefore allowed with the following orders/directions:

(i) Ext.P2 and P4 Government Orders and the Guidelines for Access Permission to Fuel Stations along State Highways (SH) and Major District roads (MSR) approved as per Ext.P4 are set aside;

(ii) Orders of the District Authorities rejecting the applications for NOC under Rule 144 of the petroleum Rules, 2002 submitted by the petitioners/the respective Oil Marketing Companies for non-compliance of Ext.P2 or P4 Guidelines, are set aside.

(iii) In those Writ Petitions where District Authorities have granted NOC subject to the condition of producing NOC from PWD, the said condition is declared as null and void.

            (iv)  The         District    Authorities    concerned     are
 WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021             ..4..


directed to consider/re-consider the applications submitted by the petitioners for NOC under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 without regard to Exts.P2 and P4 and in accordance with the Rules prevailing as on the dates of the applications, within a period of two months.

(v) The petitioners will be at liberty to cure any other defects in their applications or pointed out in the orders of rejection of their applications, in the meanwhile.

(vi) WP(C) Nos. 15228/2020, 12396/2020, 9008/2020, 8075/2020, 4614/2020, 4607/2020, 3549/2020, 35334/2020, 35036/2020, 33640/2020, 29361/2020 and 68/2021 which are filed challenging grant of NOC ignoring Exts.P2 and P4 Government Orders are dismissed."

Exts.P2 and P4 referred to in the above judgment are G.O.

(Ms)No.16/2020/PWD dated 10.02.2020 and G.O.

(Ms)No.67/2020/PWD 16.10.2020 viz., Exts. P4 and P5 herein.

3. Regarding the prayer for direction to the 4 th respondent

to issue NOC to the petitioner's site for starting the petroleum

retail outlet notwithstanding the objection of the neighbours, the

petitioner relies on Exts.P7, P8 and P9 judgments wherein this

Court has considered similar issue and held that consent of

neighbouring property owners is not required for grant of NOC

and that the District Collector is legally bound to consider WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021 ..5..

applications for NOC to start Fuel Retail Outlets,

notwithstanding the protest of the local people.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 4th

respondent, to consider Ext. P2 application for the grant of NOC

to the 5th respondent in terms of paragraph 54 of the judgment

dated 05.08.2021 in W.P(C) No.9881/2020 & connected cases

and in the light of Exts.P7, P8 and P9 judgments. Orders shall be

passed within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this

judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE

SB

//true copy //

P.A To Judge WP(C) NO. 17082 OF 2021 ..6..

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17082/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 03/09/2019.

Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR GETTING NOC TO THE OUT LET AWARDED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 09/10/2019.

Exhibit P3 COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO.46/2019/PWD DATED 22/10/2019.

Exhibit P4 COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO.16/2020/PWD DATED 10/02/2020.

Exhibit P5 COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF GO(MS) NO. 67/2020/PWD DATED 16/10/2020.

Exhibit P6 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF WPC NO. 5973/2021 DATED 12/08/2021.

Exhibit P7 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 30818/2015 DATED 13/10/2015.

Exhibit P8 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 9081/2017 DATED 30/05/2019.

Exhibit P9 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.19140/2020 DATED 23/09/2020.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter