Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17215 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16895 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1 JITHIN J.F.,
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O. JOHN JAYAKUMAR, EDENS CHAMAVILA, KARAKULAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695564.
2 SHARON RAJ U.P.,
AGED 23 YEARS
S/O. VIJAYARAJ, KULIRMA, KALLAYAM P.O., PLAVILA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695043.
3 AMAL RAJ V.K.,
KALLAYAM P.O., PLAVILA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695043
4 SAJIN S.,
AGED 24 YEARS
S/O. STEPHEN A., MOTHIRAMMADAKKI, NEDUVANVILA,
PARASALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695502.
5 AJITH V.S.,
AGED 22 YEARS
S/O. LATE VIKRAMAN, VADAKKINKARA VEEDU, ASHUKULAM,
VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695521.
6 VINEETH V.A.,
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O. VINOD I.S., UNMESH, MALAYAM, MALAYAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695571.
7 VIVEK V.A.,
AGED 19 YEARS
S/O. VINOD I.S., UNMESH MALAYAM, MALAYAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695571.
WP(C) NO. 16895 OF 2021
2
8 ABINRAJ R.J.,
AGED 19 YEARS
S/O. RAJAN, R.J. HOUSE, THETTIVILA, KALLIYOOR P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695042.
9 AJEESH L.S.,
ALOSH BHAVAN, ARASUMMOODU, MOONNANAKUZHY P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695615.
10 SANTHOSH R.,
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, KRIPA BHAVAN, ARASUMMOODU, VEMBAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695615.
BY ADVS.
M.KIRANLAL
MANU RAMACHANDRAN
R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
T.S.SARATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695001.
2 THE SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, GROUND FLOOR, MAIN BLOCK, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
3 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010.
SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN-SR. G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16895 OF 2021
3
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the
challenge is against a Special Rule, the matter can be considered only by
this Court.
The said submission is erroneous. The KAT is fully empowered to
consider any challenge against Special Rules as well. In the above view of
the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as not being maintainable before
this Court. It is for the petitioner to raise the issue in appropriate
proceedings before the KAT.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP WP(C) NO. 16895 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16895/2021
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 25/02/2011.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) NO.50/2021 DATED 02/07/2021.
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 30/01/2019
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO. 725/2014 DATED 31/12/2014.
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.337/2020.
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION DATED 26/12/2014 TO THE CATEGORY NO. 383/2014.
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF POLICE PERSONNEL APPOINTED TO THE VACANCIES ON DEPUTATION IN TECHNICAL CATEGORIES DATED 25/06/2020.
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/07/2021 PREFERRED TO THE SECRETARY.
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DATED 26/07/2021.
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 07/08/2021.
Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 09/10/2019.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!