Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17145 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16726 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1 VIJAYAN C @ RAGHAVAN,AGED 72 YEARS
S/O.DEVAKY AMMA, 2/751-"SREYASS", CHERUVARA HOUSE,
(PRESIDENT, KUTTANKULANGARA DEVASWAM, DEVASWAM OFFICE,
TEMPLE LANE, HARI NAGAR), POONKUNNAM VILLAGE, DESOM,
POONKUNNAM P.O., THRISSUR DT. 680 002
2 SAJEEV KUMAR T.R.,AGED 46 YEARS,S/O.RAMAN EZHUTHACHAN,
THAZHATHUVALAPPIL HOUSE, (SECRETARY, KUTTANKULANGARA
DEVASWAM, DEVASWAM OFFICE, TEMPLE LANE, HARI NAGAR),
POONKUNNAM VILLAGE, DESOM, POONKUNNAM P.O.,
THRISSUR DT. 680 002
BY ADV SHOBY K.FRANCIS
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.
AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN CODE 695 001
2 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO GOVT. AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN CODE 695 001
3 DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR
680 003
4 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
OFFICE OF RDO, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DT. 680 003
5 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
OF CHOWANNUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS CONVENER,
AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CHOWANNUR KRISHI BHAVAN, CHOWANNUR
PO, THRISSUR DT. 680 517
6 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,CHOWANNUR KRISHI BHAVAN,
CHOWANNUR PO, THRISSUR DT. 680 517
7 VILLAGE OFFICER,CHEMMANTHATTA VILLAGE, CHEMMANTHATTA P.O.,
THRISSUR 680 517, THRISSUR DT.
GP SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16726 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Finding illegal reclamation of paddy land, the
3rd respondent passed Ext P1 order in terms of
Section 13 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddyland
and Wetland Act, 2008(for short, 'the Act')directing
restoration of the property. Challenging the said
order, the petitioner has preferred Ext P3 revision
before the 1st respondent. The revision is to be
heard by the 2nd respondent. The apprehension of the
petitioner is that, pending consideration of Ext P3
revision, Ext P1 order might be enforced.
2. I deem it only appropriate that, status quo
regarding the property be maintained till the
disposal of the statutory revision.
Accordingly, without expressing anything on
merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing
the 2nd respondent to hear and dispose of Ext P2
revision, as expeditiously as possible and at any WP(C) NO. 16726 OF 2021
rate within a period of three months from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till final
orders are passed, status quo with regard to the
property shall be maintained by both sides.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE vdv WP(C) NO. 16726 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16726/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8.7.2021 HAVING NO.B6-316/2020
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.15654/2021 DATED 5.8.2021
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION WITH REQUEST FOR INTERIM ORDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SEC. 28 OF THE ACT DATED 9.8.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!