Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Haris V. K vs Biju Prabhakar Ias
2021 Latest Caselaw 17040 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17040 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
Haris V. K vs Biju Prabhakar Ias on 12 August, 2021
Con.Case(C) No.1155/2021                     1/2

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                           PRESENT
                           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
                Thursday, the 12th day of August 2021 / 21st Sravana, 1943

                 CONTEMPT CASE(C) NO. 1155 OF 2021(S) IN WP(C) 7248/2021




   PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:

           HARIS V.K., S/O. MAMUKOYA, AGED 43 YEARS,
           VELANCHERI KANDIYIL, PERUMANNA P.O.,
           PATHEERANKAV, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 019.
           (EX-DRIVER, KSRTC, KOZHIKODE DEPOT)

         BY ADV SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
   RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WPC:

           SHRI.BIJU PRABHAKAR IAS, MANAGING DIRECTOR,
           KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
           FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

           SRI.T.P. SAJAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT.


        This Contempt of court case (civil) having come up for orders on
   12.08.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:

                                                        P.T.O.
 Con.Case(C) No.1155/2021                        2/2




                                  SUNIL THOMAS, J.
                                 =================
                                C.O(C).No.1155 of 2021
                                 =================
                           Dated this the 12th day of August, 2021

                                           ORDER

It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel that, order

has not been implemented on the premise that the KSRTC has filed

a review petition. The premise on which the review petition has

been filed is that, the right to proceed against the petitioner in

accordance with law has not been reserved in the judgment. It is

made clear that, even without a specific right being reserved,

since the judgment is based on technical reasons, judgment will

not preclude KSRTC from initiating the appropriate action,

independently, on any misconduct alleged, notwithstanding the

judgment dated 08.04.2021. Report compliance. Post on

10.09.2021.

          h/o.                                                Sd/-

                                                         SUNIL THOMAS
                                                             Judge


          Sbna/




12-08-2021                        /True Copy/                              Assistant Registrar
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter