Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

George Mathew vs District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 16757 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16757 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021

Kerala High Court
George Mathew vs District Collector on 11 August, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 20TH SRAVANA, 1943
                    WP(C) NO. 15528 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

         GEORGE MATHEW,
         AGED 60 YEARS,
         S/O. MATHAI, PUTHEN KALAPURAYIL, VEZHUPOOR,
         THAMARASSERY P.O., KAROTH,
         KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 573.

         BY ADVS.
         UNNIKRISHNAN.V.ALAPATT
         N.G.ANITHA


RESPONDENTS:

    1    DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
         CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
    2    THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
         CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
    3    THE TAHASILDAR KOZHIKODE,
         CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
    4    THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
         KOTTOOLI VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 001.

         BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. HANIL KUMAR HARSHAN

     THIS WRIT PETITION       (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP      FOR
ADMISSION ON 11.08.2021,      THE COURT ON THE SAME       DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.15528/2021
                               :2 :




                        JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

Dated this the 11th day of August, 2021

The petitioner prays to direct the 3 rd respondent to

reassess and reclassify the petitioner's land covered by

Ext.P7 order as 'purayidam' in the Basic Tax Register and in

the Thandaper Register and in other Revenue records in the

light of the law laid down in LLMC Kizhakkambalam Grama

Panchayat v. Mariumma and another [2015 (3) KHC 19

(DB)].

2. The petitioner states that he is the absolute owner

of 163 cents of property comprised in Re-survey Nos.23/1F

and 23/1E of Kottooli Village in Kozhikode District. According

to the petitioner, the property is garden land for the last so

many decades. The 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional

Officer, on the request of the predecessors-in-interest of the

property, granted permission to convert the land as per Ext.P7

proceedings under Clause 6(2) of the Kerala Land Utilisation WP(C) No.15528/2021

Order. However, necessary entries were not made in the

Basic Tax Register. The petitioner submitted Ext.P8 petition

and Ext.P8(A) Form-A application for re-assessment of basic

tax. The petitioner seeks to direct the 3 rd respondent-

Tahsildar to consider Exts.P8 and P8(A) and pass orders

thereon.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

4. Ext.P7 proceedings of the Revenue Divisional

Officer would show that permission was granted for

conversion of land into garden land after an enquiry and

finding that the land is not suitable for paddy cultivation. The

petitioner by Ext.P8(A) submitted an application for fixation of

rate of basic tax in respect of the lands. Ext.P8(A) is of

statutory nature.

5. In the judgment in LLMC Kizhakkambalam Grama

Panchayat (supra), this Court has held that where the change

for user of the land is granted in terms of provisions contained

in Rule 6(2) of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, then WP(C) No.15528/2021

the Revenue officials concerned are statutorily obliged to

make a re-assessment of the property in terms of Section 6A

of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 and then should make

necessary entries in the Basic Tax Register maintained in

terms of the provisions contained in Rule 5 of the Kerala Land

Tax Rules, so as to show the change in the nature of the land

as garden land etc. and not as Nilam/Paddy Land etc.

Exts.P8 and P8(A) applications being of statutory

nature, the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar is bound to consider the

same in accordance with law. The writ petition is therefore

disposed of with a direction to the 3 rd respondent-Tahsildar

(LR) to consider Exts.P8 and P8(A) within a period of two

months, taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in

LLMC Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat (supra).

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

aks/12.08.2021 WP(C) No.15528/2021

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15528/2021

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4408/08 OF CHEVAYOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.3869/05 OF CHEVAYOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO.2505/83 OF CHEVAOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.82/09 OF CHEVAYOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COY OF THE SALE DEED NO.60/09 OF CHEVAYOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1100/05 OF CHEVAYOOR S.R.O.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.1140/84/C DATED 30.11.1984.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 27.7.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P8(A) TRUE COPY OF THE FORM A APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P8 PETITION DATED 29.7.2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter