Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16726 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021
LA.APP. NO.235 OF 2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 20TH SRAVANA, 1943
LA.APP. NO. 235 OF 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN LAR 561/2009 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB
COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.G.SAROJINI
RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS:
1 SAROJAM
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA, NALANCHIRA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 015.
2 P. LAWARANCE
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA, NALANCHIRA
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 015.
MARY LAWRENCE
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA NALANCHIRA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015.
{THE 1ST RESPONDENT 'SAROJAM' WHO IS NONE OTHER THAN
THE 3RD RESPONDENT 'MARY LAWARANCE' IS RECORDED THE
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DECEASED 2ND RESPONDENT
AS PER THE ORDER IN I.A. NO. 336 OF 2016
(I.A.NO.2/2016) DATED 05/08/2021}.
3 SOJAN M. LAWRENCE,
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA, NALANCHIRA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015.
4 SAJIN M. LAWRENCE,
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA, NALANCHIRA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015.
LA.APP. NO.235 OF 2014
2
5 SAJINI M. LAWRENCE,
PAUL BUILDING, SOJAN VILLA, NALANCHIRA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015.
(ADDITIONAL R3 TO ADDL. R5 ARE IMPLEADED AS LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED 2ND RESPONDENT AS
PER ORDER DATED 05.08.2021 IN IA 336 PF 2016 (I.A
No.2/2016)
BY ADVS.
SRI.JOSH RAJAN
BASANT BALAJI
SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA FOR R1, R4 AND R5
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
LA.APP. NO.235 OF 2014
3
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the judgment and decree in L.A.R
No.561/2009 of the II Additional Subordinate Judges Court,
Thiruvananthapuram , the State is in appeal.
2. An extent of 0.18 ares of land in Re-Sy.No.442/69
of the Kudappanakkunnu Village in Thiruvananthapuram
Taluk was acquired for the purpose of widening of the
Mannanthala - Kesavadasapuram Road. The Section 4(1)
notification was issued on 31.01.2005 under the Land
Acquisition Act,1894. The Land Acquisition Officer
categorised the properties. The property in question was
categorised as 'C' category and land value was fixed at
Rs.2,45,369/- per Are. On the reference made by the
respondents, the Reference Court, relying on the judgment
in LAR No.827/2009, enhanced the land value of 'A'
category property to Rs.24,00,000/- per Are from
Rs.2,94,493/- per Are. After giving a deduction of 25%, to LA.APP. NO.235 OF 2014
the above land value, the land value of the 'C' category
property was fixed at Rs.19,20,000/- per Are. It is
challenging the above fixation that the appeal is filed.
3. It is conceded by the learned Government Pleader
that this Court while considering a batch of cases arising
out of the same notification in respect of similarly situated
properties, this Court upheld the land value fixed by the
Reference Court and declined interference by the
judgments in LAA No.662 of 2013 and LAR 26/2013. The
respondents are entitled to the very same benefit as in the
previously decided appeals.
In the above factual matrix, nothing further survives in
this appeal. The appeal is devoid of any merits and is
hence dismissed.
Sd/- C.S.DIAS
ma/11.8.2021 JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!