Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16685 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021
WP(C) NO. 15618 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 20TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 15618 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
INDUS TOWERS LIMITED
8TH FLOOR, VANKARATH TOWERS, N H BYPASS,
PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682024, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. RAJKUMAR PAVOTHIL.
BY ADVS.
A.KUMAR
P.J.ANILKUMAR
G.MINI(1748)
P.S.SREE PRASAD
JOB ABRAHAM
AJAY V.ANAND
RESPONDENT/S:
1 DISTRICT TELECOM COMMITTEE,
DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION BUILDING, CIVIL
STATION ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695043,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR.
2 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
POLICE GROUND, CV RAMAN PILLAI RD., THYCAUD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695014.
3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KADINAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KADINAMKULAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695303.
4 KADINAMKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BY PASS JUNCTION,
KAZHAKKUTTOM, TRIVANDRUM, KERALA-695582.
SRI SAYED M THANGAL, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 15618 OF 2021 2
JUDGMENT
Indus Towers Ltd., the petitioner herein, is a Company incorporated
under the Companies Act and a Passive Infrastructure Service Provider
registered with the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of
Communications and IT, Government of India. They have approached this
Court seeking directions to respondents 2 and 3 to implement Exhibit-P3 order
passed by the District Telecom Committee by which police protection was
granted to the petitioner to enable them to carry out the construction of the
telecommunication tower covered by Exhibit-P2 building permit.
2. Sri. A. Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
submits that by Exhibit-P3 order the District Telecom Committee has issued
direction to the Station House Officer to grant sufficient protection to the
petitioner to carry out the construction of the Tower. On the strength of
Exhibit-P3, they approached the Station House Officer, Kadinamkulam Police
Station and filed Ext.P4 representation. However, no assistance has been
granted, is the contention. It is in the afore circumstances that the petitioner
is before this Court.
3. I have heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
4. The records produced by the petitioner would reveal that the local
authority has issued Ext.P2 building permit to the petitioner to carry out the
construction of a telecommunication tower. When objections were raised on
various grounds, the petitioner had approached the District Telecom
Committee and after considering all relevant aspects, the objections raised by
the objectors were rejected and the Station House Officer was directed to
afford sufficient protection for the construction of the tower.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions
made across the bar, there will be a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to
ensure that the petitioner is able to carry out and complete the construction of
the telecommunication tower on the strength of Exhibit P2 permit and Exhibit
P3 order without any obstructions from any quarters.
This writ Petition will stand disposed of.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE sru
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15618/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BY CEO IN FAVOUR OF THE DEPONENT SIGNATORY DATED 12.6.2020.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 31.8.2019.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT TELECOM COMMITTEE DATED 10.7.2021.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ALONG WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 19.7.2021.
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION NO.18648/2018 DATED 19.6.2018 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!