Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16567 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 20TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
CHANDRAN PILLAI T.
AGED 58 YEARS
S/O THANKAPPAN PILLAI.K,ASSISTANT ENGINEER (HG) (RETIRED FROM
PH SECTION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM
DISTRICT), RESIDING AT VRINDAVAN, MUGHATHALA (PO), KOLLAM
DISTRICT, PIN-691577.
BY ADVS.
M.V.THAMBAN
R.REJI
THARA THAMBAN
B.BIPIN
ARUN BOSE
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
JALA BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
3 THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (VIGILANCE)
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHPAURAM, PIN-695001.
4 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
PH CIRCLE, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, KOLLAMD ISTRICT,
PIN-691001.
5 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PROJECT DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, KOLLAM
DISTRICT-691001.
6 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PH DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM
DISTRICT-691506.
WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
2
7 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PH SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM
DISTRICT, PIN-691506.
8 THE FINANCE MANAGER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
BY ADV SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.08.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is stated to have retired, on attaining the
age of superannuation, from the services of the Kerala Water
Authority (KWA) on 31.05.2017, is before this Court complaining
that his retiral benefits have not been disbursed to him by its
competent Authority until now. The petitioner, prays that the KWA
be directed to disburse to him the said benefits within a time frame
to be fixed by this Court, along with 18% interest on it.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner -
Sri.M.V.Thamban, added to the afore submissions saying that
Exts.P10 and P14 proceedings, to the extent to which it relates to
the petitioner, are completely untenable, since no enquiry and not
even a notice under the provisions of Note 3 to Rule 3 of Part III of
the Kerala Service Rules (KSR), has even been issued to him; and
thus asserted that the KWA cannot now take a stand that the said
benefits will not be disbursed to him. He therefore, reiteratingly
prayed that this writ petition be allowed.
3. In response, Sri.Benjamin Paul, learned Standing
Counsel for the KWA, submitted that a counter affidavit has been WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
filed by the respondents, wherein, several allegations against the
petitioner have narrated and added that a vigilance enquiry was
also ordered against him. He submitted that, therefore, the KWA
will have to now find whether any liability is due from the petitioner
and that only after the requisite non liability certificate is issued to
him, can he seek his retiral benefits.
4. Even when I hear Sri.Benjamin Paul on the afore lines,
the fact remains that, in the counter affidavit filed by the
respondents, there is not even a whisper that any liability has been
fixed against the petitioner as of now. No doubt, the said counter
affidavit contains several averments as regards the allegations
against the petitioner, but unless these had been properly
investigated and enquired into as per law, thus fructifying into a
finding of liability against the petitioner, his retiral benefits cannot
be held up by the KWA any further.
In the afore circumstances, I order this writ petition and direct
the respondents to pay the petitioner his retiral benefits within a
period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment, in case no liability has been fixed against him until now.
If, on the contrary, any liability has been fixed or is sought to be WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
fixed in terms of Note 3 to Rule 3 of Part III of the KSR, then
certainly the petitioner will be properly notified; and his liberty to
challenge against such proceedings is left open however, with the
specific clarification that no such proceedings can now be initiated
afresh since it is over three years after his retirement.
I further direct that if the retiral benefits are not paid to the
petitioner within the afore time frame, then the same will carry
interest at the rate of 9 % from the date on which it became due,
until it is actually paid.
As regards the petitioner's request for payment of interest, I
leave it open to be pursued by him appropriately, through a proper
procedure, since it will not be possible for this Court, while it acts
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to assess disputations
of facts or to evaluate documents, based on which the KWA defends
the delay that has been caused.
This writ petition is thus disposed of.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31969/2018
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/AO(ESTT)/PEN:9317/COM:/ (NON MEDICAL)/8386/3383.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
KWA/AO(ESTT)/PEN:9317/COM:/ (NON MEDICAL)/ 8386/6792, OF THE 8TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E2/2092/2009 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 5.6.2012 ISSUED TO THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY SUB DIVISION, PUNALUR ALONG WITH THE LIST OF MATERIALS.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 18.2.2014, CONVENED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND THE SAME TYPE WRITING COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 10.7.2015 CONVENED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.7.2015 OF THE PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.KWA/PHDnK/AB2-9/2017 DATED 4.5.2018.
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11.6.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND THE SAME TYPE WRITING COPY.
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER'S NOTICE DATED 16.6.2018 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER.
WP(C) NO. 31969 OF 2018
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.8.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE PERSONAL HEARING HELD BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 3.9.2018 ALONG WITH THE STATEMENT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.KWA/PHDnK/AB2-9/2017 DATED 14.9.2018 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS ENCLOSURES.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!