Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16485 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
WP(C) NO. 12390 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 12390 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
1 SAVITHRI,
AGED 82 YEARS,
W/O. LATE SUBRAMANIAN, MOONATTU HOUSE, MUKKANNOOR
P.O. ANGAMALY 683 577.
2 BABU.M.S.,
AGED 53 YEARS,
S/O. LATE SUBRAMANIAN, MOONATTU HOUSE, MUKKANNOOR
P.O. ANGAMALY 683 577.
BY ADVS.
RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
R.S.SARAT
K.VIJINA
ARUL MURALIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR,
(COMPETENT AUTHORITY), KOCHI-SALEM PIPELINE
PVT.LTD., (KSPPL), KARUN ENCLAVE, IIND FLOOR, ROOM
NO. B2, S.N. JUNCTION, THRIPUNITHURA 682 301.
*2 ADDL.R2.
KOCHI-SALEM PIPELINE PRIVATE LIMITED,
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NEAR CHOICE
PARADISE, MALAYIL MAJESTY BUILDINGS, ROOM NO.174-G,
2ND FLOOR, KARINGACHIRA, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM -
682 301.
WP(C) NO. 12390 OF 2021 2
[ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 29.07.2021
* IN I.A.1/2021 IN WP(C)12390/2021.]
BY ADVS.
MARIAM MATHAI
SAJI VARGHESE, SC
SRI SAYED M THANGAL, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 05.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 12390 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
Petitioners state that they are the absolute owners in title and
possession of property having an extent of 1 Ares and 75 sq.m. in Survey
No.298/12 of Block 15 of Mukkannur Village. The grievance of the
petitioners herein is that based on a request made by one of their
neighbours, the alignment of the pipeline has been changed by the
additional 2nd respondent. In the afore circumstances the 2nd petitioner
has submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 1st respondent. Their
prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the said respondent to
consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.
2. When the writ petition has come up for admission, this Court had
directed the petitioner to implead the 'Kochi - Salem Pipeline Pvt. Ltd.
represented by the Chief Executive' as the additional 2nd respondent and
the additional 2nd respondent was impleaded.
3. Sri.Saji Varghese, the learned counsel appearing for the additional
2nd respondent submitted that the contentions of the petitioners are without
merit. According to the learned counsel, there is no change of alignment
and the contentions on those lines are baseless. It is further submitted that
since Ext.P3 is pending consideration, directions can be issued to the 2nd
respondent to consider the same.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the
submissions made across the Bar, there will be a direction to the petitioner
to approach the additional 2nd respondent and file a representation within a
period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment
narrating his grievance. If such a representation is filed, the 2nd respondent
shall consider the same, with notice to the petitioner and pass appropriate
order on its merits expeditiously, in any event, within a further period of
three weeks.
This writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V,
JUDGE sru
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12390/2021
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.
MKNR/275/18 (32) DATED 12.6.2019 UNDER SECTION 6 (1) OF ACT 50/1962 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.
MKNR/275/2018 (30) DATED 11.6.2019 UNDER SECTION 6 (1) OF ACT 50/1962 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO SUBRAMANIAN.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 5.4.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITION TO THE RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DOWNLOADED FROM THE SITE OF POSTAL DEPARTMENT REGARDING DELIVERY OF EXHIBIT P3 ON THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!