Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16409 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 27660 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
TOMY THOMAS,
AGED 55 YEARS,
S/O. THOMAS, MEKKATTU HOUSE, KOORAPPADA P.O,
PAMPADY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
MANALUNKAL P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686503,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE SECRETARY,
AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MANALUNKAL P.O,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686503,
3 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
BY ADV SRI.P.I.GEORGEKUTTY, SC
SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SURYA BINOY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.08.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).10512/2021,
10513/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
:2 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 10512 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
JOBY GEORGE,
AGED 48 YEARS,
S/O. GEORGE, VETTIKATTIL HOUSE,
ARUVIKUZHI P.O., AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE,
KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
MANALUNKAL P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 503,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE SECRETARY,
AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
MANALUNKAL P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 503.
3 THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST,
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
CIVIL STATION,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 002.
4 CHIEF TOWN PLANNER,
OFFICE OF CHIEF TOWN PLANNER ,
2 AND 3RD FLOOR,
SWARAJ BHAVAN, NANDANCODE,
KAWADIYAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 03.
BY ADV. SRI.P.I.GEORGEKUTTY, SC FOR PANCHAYATH
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADSER SMT. SURYA BINOY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.08.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).27660/2020 AND
CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
:3 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 10513 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
THOMASKUTTY,
AGED 55 YEARS,
S/O. JOSEPH, MYLADIYIL HOUSE,
MANALINKAL P.O. AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE,
KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 SENIOR GEOLOGIST,
DISTRICT OFFICE,
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
CIVIL STATION , KOTTAYAM 686 002.
2 CHIEF TOWN PLANNER,
OFFICE OF CHIEF TOWN PLANNER,
2 AND 3RD FLOOR, SWARAJ BHAVAN,
NANDANCODE, KAWADIYAR P.O.
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 03.
ADDL.3 AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
MANALUNKAL P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686503
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
ADDL.4 THE SECRETARY,
AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
MANALUNKAL P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN:686503
(ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS
PER ORDER DATED 05.08.2021 IN IA.NO.1 OF 2021)
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SURYA BINOY
SRI. P.I.GEORGEKUTTY, SC FOR PUNCHAYATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.08.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).27660/2020 AND
CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
:4 :
JUDGMENT
~~~~~~~~~
Dated this the 5th day of August, 2021
[WP(C) Nos.27660/2020, 10512/2021 & 10513/2021]
In all these writ petitions, the petitioners wanted to
construct Villas. The Akalakunnam Grama Panchayat issued
Building Permits for construction of the Villas. The
construction of the Villas needed levelling of land. Therefore,
the petitioners submitted application for Development Permit.
2. The applications submitted by the petitioners for
Development Permit were not positively considered by the
Panchayat authorities. It is aggrieved by the non-issuance of
Development Permits that the petitioners have approached
this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners urged that in
the absence of Development Permit, the Geologist will not be
issuing Mineral Transit Passes which are highly necessary for WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
construction of the Villas. The action of the Panchayat
authorities in declining Development Permit is highly illegal
and arbitrary.
4. The Akalakunnam Grama Panchayat filed counter
affidavit in W.P.(C) No.27660/2020 and contested the writ
petition. The Panchayat submitted that there were several
complaints against removal of earth, from the neighbouring
property owners and one Nature Protection Samithy.
Considering the seriousness of the complaints, the application
was placed before the Panchayat Committee. Taking into
consideration the consequences which may arise from the
removal of soil from hilltop, the Panchayat did not issue the
Development Permit immediately. The District Collector
sought for a report on the issue. The Village Officer issued
Ext.R1(c) communication to the Secretary to the Grama
Panchayat stating that removal of earth from the top of the hill
would result in scarcity of drinking water, landslide, etc. The
residents of the locality will be adversely affected due to drying
up of drinking water sources. In the circumstances, removal WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
of ordinary earth from the hilltop cannot be permitted. It is
based on the said report of the Village Officer that the
Panchayat authorities have desisted from issuing
Development Permit.
5. In W.P.(C) No.10513/2021, on the application
submitted by the petitioner therein for Development Permit,
the Panchayat issued Ext.P3 communication stating that as
Building Permit is already issued to the petitioner therein, no
further Development Permit is required in the light of Ext.P4
communication.
6. The learned Standing Counsel for the Panchayat
would submit that in W.P.(C) No.10513/2021, the Panchayat
authorities have issued Ext.R3(4) communication to the
petitioner making it clear that removal of such huge amount of
ordinary earth is not necessary for the building construction
proposed by the petitioner and the petitioner was required to
submit a revised proposal for removal of ordinary earth. The
petitioner submitted Ext.R3(5) reply to the said Ext.R3(4)
communication and thereafter, the Panchayat authorities WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
issued Ext.P3 communication stating that since the petitioner
has already been issued a Building Permit, no further
Development Permit is required.
7. The construction of the petitioner being
construction of Villas, necessarily the work will include land
development. For development of land, a Development
Permit is mandated under the Kerala Panchayat Building
Rules. For transportation of ordinary earth, due sanction from
the Geologist is required under the Kerala Minor Mineral
Concession Rules. Without getting Transit Passes from the
Geologist, if the petitioners carry on the activity, the petitioners
will be facing penal action including prosecution under the
relevant statute. In the circumstances, a Development Permit
is indeed necessary for the petitioners.
8. The contention of the Panchayat is that such
removal of large quantities of ordinary earth from the site is
likely to result in adverse environmental impact. Drinking
water availability will be reduced and removal of earth from the
hilltop may result in drought situation also. It will create untold WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
hardship to the local residents and therefore the Panchayat
authorities are not in a position to issue Development Permit.
9. In these cases, it is to be noted that the Panchayat
authorities have relied on a report of the Village Officer for
arriving at the conclusion that removal of ordinary earth will
result in adverse environmental consequences. A report of
the Village Officer is not a material legally sufficient enough for
the Panchayat to decline Development Permit. In case the
Panchayat authorities want to decline Development Permit,
they will have to obtain expert opinion in the matter from a
competent Body. The action of the Panchayat in declining the
application for Development Permit to the petitioners on the
basis of a report by the Village Officer, is therefore
unsustainable.
10. In such circumstances, the Akalakunnam Grama
Panchayat is directed to reconsider the application submitted
by the petitioners for issuance of Development Permit. The
Panchayat authorities will be at liberty to obtain expert opinion
on the environmental issues from a competent Body/expert WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
agency. If the Panchayat authorities propose to obtain such
expert opinion, then the applications of the petitioners should
be considered in the light of such expert opinion and a
decision shall be taken in the matter. Final orders on the
applications for Development Permit shall be passed within a
period of six weeks. Ext.P8 decision taken by the Panchayat
Committee and Ext.P9 communication issued by the Secretary
in W.P.(C) No.27660/2020, which are not based on such
expert opinion, are unsustainable and therefore they are set
aside. Exts.P3 and P4 in W.P.(C) No.10512/2021 are also set
aside.
Writ petitions are disposed of as above.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
aks/06.08.2021 WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27660/2020
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT OF PROPERTY OF PETITIONER DATED 19.05.2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY
ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE
DATED 20.08.2020ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 6.3.2020
IN CONNECTION WITH RECEIPT OF
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30.07.2020 IN CONNECTION WITH RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF ENQUIRY DATED 14.09.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, KOTTAYAM.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 23.09.2020
ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
KOTTAYAM TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE
DECISION TAKEN BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE MEETING HELD ON 16.10.2020.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED
BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED
28.10.2020 TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R1(a) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT
SUBMITTED BY TEH AKALAKUNNAM NATURE PROTECTION SAMITHI TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 9.10.2020 WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
EXHIBIT R1(b) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 23.10.2020 EXHIBIT R1(c) THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT BY VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 8.1.2021 WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10512/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
24.7.2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE
OFFICER, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL AND
BUILDING PERMIT DATED 22.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION NO. 14/2 OF
THE PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE OF FIRST
RESPONDENT HELD ON 6.11.2020.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
20.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND
RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 3.8.2020
ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT
REGARDING RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE R1(A) THE TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST GIVEN BY THE PETITIOENR FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT DATED 27.7.2020 ANNEXURE R1(B) THE TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FROM THE PANCHAYATH TO THE ENGINEER DATED 13.8.2020 ANNEXURE R1(C) THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT PREPARED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LSGD DATED 16.9.2020 ANNEXURE R1(D) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE NATURE PROTECTION SAMITHY BY ITS LETTER DATED 7.10.2020 ANNEXURE R1(E) THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FROM ONE P.J.KURIAN DATED 23.10.2020 IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE R1(F) THE TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE PANCHAYATH COMMITTE DATED 16.10.2020 WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
ANNEXURE R1(G) THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AKALAKUNNAM DATED 8.1.2021 WP(C) No.27660/2020 & Connected cases
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10513/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
12.4.2021 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE
OFFICER, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL AND
BUILDING PERMIT DATED 18.8.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.3.2021 ISSUED BY SECRETARY, AKALAKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 22.12.2020.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23.04.2021 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
SR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!