Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16350 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 14105 OF 2009
PETITIONER:
UNION BANK OF INDIA,
HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG,
NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400 021, AND BRANCH AT
MATTANCHERRY KNOWN AS, KOCHI MAIN BRANCH, BAZAR ROAD,
PB NO.185, MATTANCHERY, KOCHI, PIN-682 002, REPRESENTED
BY SENIOR MANAGER.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.V.THOMAS
SRI.JOJO GEORGE
SRI.NIDHI SAM JOHNS
RESPONDENTS:
1 M/S.MAHAVIR PLANTATIONS PVT.LTD,
24/1551, INDIRA GANDHI ROAD, W/ISLAND, KOCHI-682 003,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2 UNIT TRUST OF INDIA,
13, SIR VITHALDAS MARG, NEW MARINE LINES,
MUMBAI-400 020,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
3 BANK OF INDIA,
STAR HOUSE, C-26, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX,
BANDRA (E), MUMBAI,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4 INDIAN BANK,
31, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND, MANAGING DIRECTOR.
5 THE SECRETARY,
INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
6 THE COLLECTOR,
CENTRAL EXCISE, C.R.BUILDING,
I.S. PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-682 018.
WP(C) No.14105 OF 2009
2
7 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
8 THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX,
(R), MAYOOR BHAVAN, CANNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI.
9 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL,
EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, ESIC,
REGIONAL OFFICE, RAJENDRA BHAVAN, RAJENDRA PALACE,
NEW DELHI-110 008.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.V.AJAYAKUMAR, SC, ESI CORPN.
SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
KUM.P.H.RIMJU
SRI.V.J.ANAND
SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR
SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
SRI.JITHIN PAUL VARGHESE
SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F.
SRI.VINOD JABAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.14105 OF 2009
3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the writ petition is
not pressed.
In the light of the submission made
by the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the writ petition is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE
WW
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!