Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12142 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 30TH CHAITHRA, 1943
Crl.MC.No.1748 OF 2021(G)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1768/2017 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS -I,HOSDRUG
CRIME NO.792/2017 OF Hosdurg Police Station , Kasargod
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 6 :
1 NOOMAN K.H.
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN,
SHAMEEMA MANZIL,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
2 MUHAMMEDALI.M.K.,
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. ISMAIL,
FATHIMA MANZIL, KMCI/120,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
3 ASHKAR T.M.,
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O. ITTAMMAL ABDULLA,
MAILAKIRIYATH (H),
GARDER VALAPPY,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
4 RASHID.C.H.,
AGED 31 YEARS
ABDULLA.C.H.,
A.K.HOUSE,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
5 SHAKKIR .M.,
AGED 24 YEARS
S/O. ABDULLA,
NOORANIYA MANZIL,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
Crl.MC.No.1748 OF 2021
2
6 MUSHTAQ.K.H.,
AGED 23 YEARS
S/O. HAMEED.K.H.,
MUSTHAQ MANZIL,
BALLA KADAPPURAM,
HOSDURG, KASARGOD
BY ADVS.
SRI.RAHUL SASI
SMT.NEETHU PREM
SHRI.VIVEK.P.K
RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682 031
2 ABDUL BASITH
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. ABOOBACKER,
DARUL RAHIMAN MANZIL,
NEAR IQBAL HIGH SCHOOL,
AJANUR VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK,
KASARGOD-671 315
R2 BY ADV. NIRMAL V NAIR
R1 BY PP - SMT.MAYA M.M
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.1748 OF 2021
3
ORDER
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking to quash the Annexure-
A1 final report in Crime No.792/2017 of Hosdurg Police
Station, which was registered on the basis of the first
information statement given by one Abdul Basith alleging
offence punishable under Sections 143,147,148,341,324 read
with 149 of IPC.
2. After completion of the investigation, a charge sheet has
been laid before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg,
where the case was taken on file as C.C.1768/2017. There are six
accused in the final report and all of them have joined this
Criminal M.C seeking to quash the final report.
3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also
Adv. Sri.Nirmal V Nair for the second respondent. The learned
Public Prosecutor submits that he has no information regarding the
settlement.
Crl.MC.No.1748 OF 2021
4. The counsel for the second respondent has endorsed the
affidavit filed by the defacto complainant, where he has expressly
stated that the matter has been settled among the parties and he
has been paid sufficient compensation in lieu of the settlement.
5. There is no public interest involved in the matter. It
appears that it was purely a personal dispute between the
petitioners on the one hand and the second respondent/defacto
complainant on the other. Therefore, there is no legal impediment
in quashing the proceedings. When the parties themselves reach a
settlement and approach this Court for quashment of the
proceedings, High Court cannot refuse to exercise its jurisdiction
under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Such settlements would only
advance peace and harmony in the society, besides lesser the
burden of the Court. In the circumstances, the Annexure-A1 final
report shall stand quashed.
The petition is allowed as above.
Sd/-
K.HARIPAL JUDGE Jms/20.04 Crl.MC.No.1748 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.792 OF 2017 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE-A2 ORIGINAL COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08.03.2021
//True Copy// P.A to Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!