Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12054 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.25130 OF 2020(M)
PETITIONERS:
1 MARY OUSEPH,
AGED 67 YEARS
D/O. KATHREENA VARGHESE,
MANJAMATTOM HOUSE,
AMBOORI P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 505
2 TONY FERNADEZ,
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. MARY OUSEPH,
MANJAMATTOM HOUSE,
AMBOORI P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 505
BY ADV. SRI.S.NIKHIL SANKAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE POLICE CHIEF
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
2 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF,
DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004
3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
VELLARADA POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 505
4 AMBOORI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
AP-2-1,DOOR NO.1, WARD NO.2,
AMBOORI-NEYYAR DAM ROAD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,
AMBOORI, KERALA-695 505
5 TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE,
WP(C).No.25130 OF 2020(M)
2
AMBOORI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
AP-2-1,DOOR NO.1, WARD NO.2,
AMBOORI-NEYYAR DAM ROAD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,
AMBOORI, KERALA-695 505,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
6 MOLY,
D/O. ONACHAN,' KUNNEL',
AMBOORI P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRCT-695 505
7 SATHEESH,
S/O. VIKRAMAN, 'AMMETHA'
VADAKKEKARA,
AMBOORI.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 505
8 AJI THOMAS,
S/O. THOMAS,
'PALAKKAD' (H),
AMBOORI.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 505
9 BABU,
S/O.GANGADHARAN,
'PALLITHAZATHU HOUSE'.
AMBOORI.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 505
R4 BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.SARIN
SRI.S.N.SIVALAL
R6-R9 BY ADVS. SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS
SMT.E.U.DHANYA
SRI.T.SREEKANTAN
SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH; GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.M.R.SARIN, SC FOR PANCHAYAT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 16.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.25130 OF 2020(M)
3
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN,J
------------------------
WP(C) No. 25130 of 2020
------------------------
Dated this the 16th day of April, 2021
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have filed this writ petition
seeking direction to the 3rd respondent to provide
adequate and effective protection to the petitioners for
conducting business without any obstruction being
caused by the unauthorized parking of autorickshaws
in front of their shop rooms.
2. A counter affidavit has been filed by
respondents 6 to 9 , wherein, they have stated that the
4th respondent - Panchayath has taken a resolution
earmarking a particular area for the parking of
autorickshaws.
3. Since the Panchayath has already earmarked
space for parking autorickshaws, there shall be a WP(C).No.25130 OF 2020(M)
direction to respondents 3 and 4 to see that the
autorickshaws are not parked obstructing the ingress
and egress to the shop rooms of the petitioners.
4. The Station House Officer shall also see that
the law and order is maintained in the locality.
With this direction, the writ petition is disposed
of.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
dlK 16.04.2021 WP(C).No.25130 OF 2020(M)
APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 11.07.2019
EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE ILLEGAL PARKING OF AUTO RICKSHAWS IN FRONT OF PETITIONERS SHOP
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 03.03.2020
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!