Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11380 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.26291 OF 2020(J)
PETITIONER:
ANITHA GOPINATHAN
AGED 60 YEARS
W/O GOPINADHAN, ARCADIA T.C-5/2568(4) SATHAMANGALAM,
SATHAMANGALAM P.O.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 010.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.K.SOYUZ
SRI.E.V.BABYCHAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB COLLECTOR
RDO OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, SH 29,
ERANHIPPALAM P.O, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
2 THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE KOZHIKODE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR
AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, TALUK
ROAD, PUTHIYARA P.O.KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
PIN-673 004.
3 THE TAHSILDAR (LR),
TALUK OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPPALAM,
KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,PUTHIYANGADI VILLAGE,
PUTHIYANGADI P.O,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673 020
BY GP SRI. RAVI KRISHNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.26291 OF 2020(J)
2
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
W.P.(C) No.26291 of 2020
==========================
Dated this the 8th day of April, 2021
JUDGMENT
For consideration of the application submitted by
the petitioner in form No.6 under Rule 12(1) of the
Kerala Conservation of Paddyland and Wetland Rules r/w
Rule 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddyland and
Wetland Act (in short, 'the Act'), the petitioner was,
as per Ext P6 communication dated 28.10.2020, required
by the 1st respondent to produce various documents
including the building plan of the proposed building,
declaration excluding the property from the data bank
and also the title deed relating to the property. The
main grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the
requirement of production of building plan.
2. Section 27A (1) enables to seek permission for
the change of nature of an unnotified land for
residential, commercial or for other purpose. The
documents to accompany the application has been stated
in Rule 12(2) of the Rules. Same does not stipulate WP(C).No.26291 OF 2020(J)
production of building plan, as is rightly contended
by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The
relevant extract of the data bank has already been
made available by the petitioner and a copy of the
same has been marked in the writ petition as Ext P2.
At any rate, it is open for 1 st respondent to have the
data bank verified.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
ordering that, the 1st respondent shall consider Ext P5
application (form No.6) without insisting for
production of the building plan mentioned in Ext P6.
Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible
and at any rate within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge
vdv
WP(C).No.26291 OF 2020(J)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAN TAX RECEIPT DATED
6.8.20
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE
DATA BANK
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 2ND
RESPONDENT DATED 21.5.2014
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED
8.1.2016
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM
NO 6 DATED 23.6.2020
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED
28.10.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO
REV-P1/55/2020-REV DATED 30.4.2020
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!