Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11299 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA,
1943
OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 291/2010 OF FAMILY
COURT,TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER:
PRAVEEN K. SATHYRAJ, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.SATHYA
RAJ, VARUPLANKALA PUTHEN VEEDU, THIRUPURAM
VILLAGE, THIRUPURAM DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA
TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 133.
BY ADVS.
SRI.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004)
SMT.V.JAYA RAGI
SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN
SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN (KAMBISSERIL)
RESPONDENT:
RINI, D/O.WILFRED, PUSHPAVILASOM, KANNARAVILA,
NELLIMOODU, NELLIMOODU P.O., NEYYATTINKARA
TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 524.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHARAN SHAHIER
R1 BY ADV. SMT.LILIN LAL
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..2..
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 8th day of April 2021
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J
This original petition is an offshoot of the
settlement arrived at between the parties in O.P. No. 291 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court,
Thiruvananthapuram. The agreed terms in the
settlement is as follows:
"The 1st petitioner agreed to withdraw the criminal case in Crime No. 80 of 2009 of Poovar Police Station registered against the respondent and his relatives. The gold ornaments and Rs.25,000/- shall be handed over to the petitioner on the date of filing joint petition for divorce and Rs.5 lakhs shall be paid on the date of evidence on joint petition. The parties also agreed to exchange their gold chains now in possession on the date of joint petition."
2. Based on the settlement, the respondent
filed Execution petition as E.P. No.50 of 2013.
Challenging the Execution petition, the petitioner
approached this Court. According to the petitioner, OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..3..
the settlement agreement arrived at between the
parties is a mutual and reciprocal one. The
respondent not performed her part. Therefore, the
execution proceedings cannot be proceeded.
3. In the settlement, the respondent agreed
for filing a joint divorce petition. In the
connected matter, O.P No.779 of 2013, a joint
petition was filed for divorce on mutual consent
under Sec.10A of the Divorce Act, 1869. That
original petition itself was dismissed for default
for the reason that the petitioner failed to appear
to give evidence.
4. The petitioner has no objection in
complying with the terms and conditions. The
respondent also has no objection. The dilemma
appears to be in regard to the priority of
compliance of the terms of the agreement. According
to the respondent, if the petitioner pays the amount
as agreed, she has no objection in filing a joint
petition for divorce. The petitioner apprehends OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..4..
that if the amount is paid, the respondent will be
wriggled out from filing petition for divorce on
mutual consent.
5. Having adverted to the apprehensions of
both parties, we suggest the following modalities to
workout the settlement agreement. The learned
counsel for the parties readily accepted the
modality. The modalities are as follows:
i) The petitioner shall deposit the entire
money claimed in O.P. No.779 of 2013 within a period
of two months before the Family Court,
Thiruvananthapuram.
ii) The gold ornaments shall be produced before
the Family Court on the date the joint petition is
taken up.
iii) The O.P. No. 779 of 2013 would stand
restored to enable the parties to workout the
reliefs.
OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..5..
iv) we direct the parties to appear before the
Family Court on 14.06.2021 to give evidence in the
joint petition. If both the parties on that day
agree for joint divorce, the Court shall pass
appropriate orders on the application on that day
itself.
v) Once the joint petition is being allowed,
the Family Court shall allow the respondent to
withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner in
favour of the respondent as per the settlement.
vi) Gold ornaments also be handed over to the
respondent.
vii) If the composition as above is worked out,
the petitioner is free to challenge crime No.80 of
2009 registered in Poovar Police Station based on
the settlement as above.
viii) The respondent has no objection in OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..6..
quashing the proceedings in the above crime.
ix) It is made clear that if the petitioner
fails to deposit the amount as above, he will not
have the benefit of their judgment. The Execution
Proceedings can be proceeded as though this Court
had not interfered with the impugned order.
x) To workout the settlement as above, the
Execution Court is directed to defer the Execution
Proceedings till the end of June 2021.
In the light of the settlement, we dispose of
this original petition as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
JUDGE
PR OP (FC).No.149 OF 2021
..7..
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE LOK ADALATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN OP NO.291/2010 DATED 04.05.2013.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF EP NO.50/2013 IN OP NO.291/2010 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF EA NO.1/2021 IN EP NO.50/2013 IN OP NO.291/2010 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE EA NO.2/2021 IN EP NO.50/2013 IN OP NO.291/2010 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF EA NO.3/2021 IN EP NO.50/2013 IN OP NO.291/2010 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!