Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11010 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.7810 OF 2021(A)
PETITIONER:
LATHA PURUSHOTHAMAN,
AGED 43 YEARS,
D/O PURUSHOTHAMAN,
THADATHIL HOUSE,
MUKKUTTUTHARA P.O, ERUMELY,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686510.
BY ADVS.
SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN
SRI.M.KIRANLAL
SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR
SRI.T.S.SARATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK,
ATHIKKAYAM BRANCH, ATHIKKAYAM P.O,
PATHANAMTHITTA-689676,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK,
ATHIKKAYAM BRANCH, ATHIKKAYAM P.O,
PATHANAMTHITTA-689676.
R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL SHANKER, STANDING COUNSEL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.7810 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 07th day of April 2021
Heard both sides.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that scope of the instant petition is only
restricted to the housing loan taken by the
petitioner. He submits that the petitioner be
permitted to clear the overdue amount in instalments
from that housing loan, apart from a direction to
pay E.M.I.s regularly.
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the
respondents oppose this by contending that as
against the housing loan, overdue amount is about
Rs.5,48,273/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Eight
Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Three Only) and closure
amount is about Rs.18.04 Lakhs. He argues that last
payment was made by the petitioner in July 2018 and
since then there is no payment. According to the
learned Standing Counsel for the respondents , the
petitioner can clear the overdue amount in 10 WP(C).No.7810 OF 2021
instalments.
4. The learned Standing Counsel for the
respondents further submits that the petitioner is a
guarantor in a cash credit facility availed by the
customer and for recovery of the amount due and
payable towards that cash credit facility, Original
Suit No.127/2020 is pending before the learned
Munsiff, Ranni. The suit amount is Rs.1.27 lakhs
and in that suit the secured assets have been
attached. Therefore, according to the learned
Standing Counsel for the respondents, the petitioner
needs to clear this outstanding amount of cash
credit limit which is pending adjudication in the
suit.
5. I have considered the submissions advanced.
The scope of the petition is only limited in the
housing loan taken by the petitioner. The
petitioner is reported to be in arrears of defaulted
amount of about Rs.5.48 Lakhs. In this view of the
matter the petition can be disposed of with the
following direction:
WP(C).No.7810 OF 2021
(i)The petitioner to clear the entire overdue
amount of housing loan with interest and other
charges in 10 equated successive monthly instalments
commencing from 19-04-2021 apart from payment of
E.M.I.s regularly.
If this direction is complied with, the
respondents shall keep coercive action under the
SARFAESI Act initiated against the petitioner in
abeyance. A single default on the part of the
petitioner in compliance with these directions shall
entail the respondents to continue with the coercive
action initiated against the petitioner. No further
extension of time shall be granted to the petitioner
for compliance with these directions.
The petition, is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.M.BADAR JUDGE SSK/07/04 WP(C).No.7810 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE LOAN PASS SHEET OF EXHIBIT P1 LOAN ACCOUNT.NO. 0783655000000019.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!