Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saibanna vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2706 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2706 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Saibanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 March, 2026

                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727
                                                       CRL.P No. 200257 of 2026


                      HC-KAR



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
                               CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200257 OF 2026
                                       (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      SAIBANNA S/O MARUTI PURADAL
                      AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOTEL WORK
                      R/O LEPROSY COLONY, KALABURAGI CITY
                      TQ: AND DIST: KALABURAGI
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. RAJESH DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE)
                      AND:

                      THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      RAGHVENDRA NAGAR POLICE STATION
                      KALABURAGI CITY
Digitally signed by
SHIVALEELA            NOW REPRESENTED BY
DATTATRAYA UDAGI
Location: HIGH
                      THE ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
COURT OF              HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KARNATAKA
                      KALABURAGI BENCH-585105
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI.GOPALKRISHNA B. YADAV, HCGP)
                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 439 OF CR.P.C (OLD), 483 OF
                      BNSS (NEW), PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND
                      ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/A-2 (AS PER CHARGE SHEET) ON
                      BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.122/2025 OF
                      RAGHVENDRA NAGAR POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI CITY
                      REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES 103(1), 324, 3(5) OF BNS
                      2023, NOW PENDING IN C.C.NO.14962/2025 ON THE FILE OF
                      HONOURABLE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KALABURAGI.
                                -2-
                                              NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727
                                      CRL.P No. 200257 of 2026


HC-KAR



    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA


                          ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short, 'BNSS, 2023') for grant of bail to the petitioner, who

is accused No.2 in C.C.No.14962/2025 on the file of II-

Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kalaburagi.

2. On the basis of complaint lodged by one

Tolapasha, the respondent-Raghavendra Nagar Police have

registered a case in Crime No.122/2025 against Saibanna

Kumbar and others, for the offence punishable under

Sections 103(1), 324 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

(for short, 'BNS, 2023'). During the course of

investigation, petitioner-accused No.2 arrested by the

police and produced before the Court and accused has

been remanded to judicial custody. Still the petitioner is in

judicial custody. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727

HC-KAR

approached the III-Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge,

Kalaburagi in Crl.Misc.No.119/2026, the same came to be

rejected. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has

preferred this petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

that the petitioner is a law-abiding citizen and is no way

connected to the alleged offences. There is no prima facie

case made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has

been implicated at the instance of their ill-wishers. As per

the prosecution, the alleged incident took place at about

1:30 a.m. on 20.09.2025 and as per the complainant, he

was informed about the death of his brother on

20.09.2025 at about 7:30 a.m. and thereafter he went to

spot and noticed the dead body of the deceased. However,

the prosecution has cited CW.7 as the eyewitness to the

alleged incident of assault and CW.7 neither lodged any

complaint nor has informed about the alleged incident to

anybody. This aspect of the matter clearly goes to show

that CW.7 is not an eyewitness and is a planted witness.

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727

HC-KAR

Hence, the same creates doubt about the prosecution

version. Even if the statement of CW.7 is to be believed to

be true, the only allegation against the petitioner is that

he assaulted the deceased on the buttock, legs and the

same is not a vital part of the body nor the same has

caused the death of the deceased. Except voluntary

statement of accused No.1, there is absolutely no material

placed to constitute the offence against the present

petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested and is in

judicial custody since 21.09.2025. The investigation is

already completed and charge sheet has been filed. The

petitioner is not required for further investigation and

petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be

imposed by this Court. On all these grounds, prays to

allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader opposed to the bail petition and prays to dismiss

the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727

HC-KAR

5. Having heard the arguments on both sides and

perusal of materials, the following points would arise for

my consideration:

(i) Whether the petitioner is entitled for bail?

(ii) What order?

6. My answer to the above points are as under:

Point No.1 : in the Negative

Point No.2 : As per final order.

Regarding Point No.1:

7. On the basis of the complaint filed by

Tolapasha, Raghavendra Nagar Police have registered a

case in Crime No.122/2025 against the Saibanna Kumbar

and others for the aforestated offences. During the course

of investigation, the Investigating Officer has conducted

inquest panchanama, seizure panchanama and recorded

the statement of eyewitness Smt.Shahanaz @ Sabavva

and circumstantial witnesses CWs.8 to 13 and collected

post mortem report, FSL report and on thorough

investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727

HC-KAR

charge sheet against the accused for the commission of

offence under Sections 103(1), 324, 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

8. CW7-Shahanaz-eyewitness has given her

statement before the police that the accused

No.2/petitioner-Saibanna assaulted Chandsab-deceased on

his buttocks, back and hands. Though the present

petitioner has not used any weapon for commission of

offence, he has participated in the alleged incident along

with other accused. The alleged commission of offence

under Section 103 is punishable with death or

imprisonment for life. At this stage, if, the petitioner is

released on bail, there is a possibility of tampering or

threatening the prosecution witnesses and it will affect to

the society at large.

Regarding Point No.2:

9. Considering the nature and gravity of offences,

in my considered opinion it is not just and proper to allow

this petition. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2727

HC-KAR

ORDER

The petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

SDU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 13 CT-BH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter