Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Ishwar vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2406 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2406 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Ishwar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 March, 2026

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty
                                              -1-
                                                        NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467
                                                     WP No. 201145 of 2026


                   HC-KAR




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                           BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 201145 OF 2026 (S-R)


                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI ISHWAR
                   S/O SHIVALINGAPPA BADAGI,
                   AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 8 MONTHS
                   SENIOR CITIZEN,
                   ADHAAR NO. 3209 4701 4383
                   OCC: RETIRED ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
                   PRESENTLY R/A MIG-106, KHB COLONY,
                   OLD JEWARGI ROAD,
                   KALABURAGI, KARNATAKA-585102

                                                               ...PETITIONER

                   [BY SRI BIRADAR SHARANAPPA SHANKAREPPA,
Digitally signed
by SWETA            ADVOCATE THROUGH (VC)]
KULKARNI
Location: HIGH     AND:
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                        R/BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
                        FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
                        GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                        VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                        BENGALURU-560001.

                   2.   THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                        DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                        M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467
                                           WP No. 201145 of 2026


HC-KAR




3.   THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
     (A AND E) KARANTAKA PARK HOUSE ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560001.

4.   THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE,
     SHESHADRI ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560001.

5.   THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
     DEPARTMENT OF TREASURIES
     DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE
     KALABURAGI-585102.

                                                   ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI VIRANAGOUDA M. BIRADAR, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4
 AND R5;
 SRI SUDHIRSINGH R. VIJAPUR, DSGI FOR R3)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, A)
ISSUE    A   WRIT       OF    MANDAMUS      DIRECTING     THE    3RD
RESPONDENT         TO   STOP    RECOVERY    OF    THE    COMMUTED
PORTION OF PENSION BEYOND 10 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AND
REFUND THE AMOUNT RECOVERED BEYOND THE SAID PERIOD
WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM; B) ISSUE
A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO
CONSTITUTE         AN   EXPERT       COMMITTEE     FOR   THE     RE-
ASSESSMENT         OF   THE    QUANTUM     OF   COMMUTATION      OF
PENSION      AND    THE      YEARS   OF   RESTORATION     OF    FULL
PENSION; C) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER, DIRECTION AS
THIS COURT DEEMS FIT.
                               -3-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467
                                       WP No. 201145 of 2026


HC-KAR




     THIS    PETITION,    COMING      ON   FOR    PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                         ORAL ORDER

This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of

the Constitution of India seeking for the following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to stop recovery of the commuted portion of pension beyond 10 years and 8 months and refund the amount recovered beyond the said period with interest at the rate of 12% per annum;

b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to constitute an expert committee for the re-assessment of the quantum of commutation of pension and the years of restoration of full pension;

c) Issue any other writ order, direction as this court deems fit."

2. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

3. It is the case of the petitioner who is a retired

Government servant that, at the time of his retirement he

was paid lump sum amount after commutation of his

pension, and towards the recovery of the commutation

amount paid to him, amount is being deducted from his

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467

HC-KAR

pension every month. According to the petitioner, the

respondents have already recovered the lump sum

commutation amount paid to the petitioner and in spite of

the same, monthly deduction from the pension amount of

the petitioner has not been stopped. It is under these

circumstances, the petitioner has preferred this petition

seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.

4. The petitioner has not approached the competent

authority before approaching this Court in this writ petition.

According to the petitioner, the respondents have already

recovered the commutation amount which was paid to him at

the time of his retirement. If that is so, it is for the petitioner

to file necessary representation before the competent

authority and seek recovery of the excess amount, if any

recovered from the petitioner. The respondents are bound to

consider the said representation and pass appropriate

orders.

5. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion

that, if the writ petition is disposed of permitting the

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467

HC-KAR

petitioner to submit appropriate representation to the

competent authority to stop the monthly recovery from his

pension towards commutation amount paid to him at the

time of his retirement and if it is found that, the respondents

have recovered excess amount from the petitioner, to make

a request for refund of such amount, the same would serve

the ends of justice.

6. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

The writ petition is disposed of with

permission to the petitioner to submit appropriate

representation to the concerned authority along

with the copy of this order and in the event, if

such a representation is submitted by the

petitioner, the competent authority within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of

such representation, shall consider the said

representation in accordance with law, and if it is

found that the respondents have recovered

NC: 2026:KHC-K:2467

HC-KAR

excess amount from the petitioner towards

commutation amount, such excess amount shall

be refunded to the petitioner, forthwith.

Sd/-

(S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

SWK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter