Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Fakirappa S/O Demappa Patat vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 2273 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2273 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2026

[Cites 12, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shri Fakirappa S/O Demappa Patat vs State Of Karnataka on 13 March, 2026

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
                                                  -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC-D:4042
                                                        CRL.P No. 100236 of 2026


                        HC-KAR




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
                       DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
                                           BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100236 OF 2026
                             (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)

                        BETWEEN:

                        SHRI FAKIRAPPA S/O. DEMAPPA PATAT,
                        AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O. RAMAPUR VILLAGE, (MURGOD),
                        TQ. YARAGATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591129.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                        (BY SRI SANTOSH B. RAHUT, ADVOCATE)

                        AND:

                        STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                        THROUGH P.S.I, MURGOD STATION, BELAGAVI,
                        BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                        HIGH COURT OF BUILDINGS,
                        DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
Digitally signed
by MALLIKARJUN                                                        ...RESPONDENT
RUDRAYYA
KALMATH
Location: High
                        (BY SRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP)
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench

                             THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483
                        OF BNSS (U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
                        PETITION AND THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 MAY         BE
                        ENLARGED ON BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH MURGOD P.S. CRIME
                        BEARING NO.388/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
                        SECTIONS 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 109(1), 115(2),
                        118(2), 118(1), 49, 352, 351(2) AND 190 OF BNS, IN THE
                        INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

                            THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
                        ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                              -2-
                                                        NC: 2026:KHC-D:4042
                                                   CRL.P No. 100236 of 2026


    HC-KAR




                                    ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned HCGP for the respondent-State.

2. This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231,

seeking to be enlarged on bail and praying for the following

relief:

"Wherefore, it is most humble prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleaded to allow the petition and the petitioner/accused No.1 may kindly be enlarged on bail in connection with Murgod P.S.crime bearing No.338/2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 109(1), 115(2), 118(2), 118(1), 49, 352, 351(2) and read with section 190 of BNS, in the interest of Justice and equity".

3. The brief case of the prosecution is that on

27.12.2025 at about 10:00 a.m., when the complainant, her

son, daughter-in-law, and others were working in the field, at

that time the petitioner/accused No.1 and other accused came

Hereinafter referred to as "BNSS,2023"

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4042

HC-KAR

to their field and started abusing them in filthy language,

stating that the land belonged to them. The petitioner/accused

No.1 abused them and took out an axe and assaulted the

complainant's son on the head, and the other accused also

abused and assaulted the complainant and other persons.

Therefore, with these allegations, an FIR in Crime

No.388/2025 of Murgod Police Station has been registered for

the aforesaid offences.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the petitioner is in custody since 29.12.2025 and the charge

sheet has been filed. The petitioner is no longer required for

custodial interrogation. The petitioner undertakes to abide by

the conditions imposed by this Court and prays that the

petition be allowed.

5. The learned HCGP opposed the bail petition and

prayed to dismiss the same.

6. Upon considering the wound certificate produced

by the learned HCGP along with the memo, it is shown that

the complainant's son has suffered a lacerated wound,

contusion on the forehead, and abrasion at the left sub-costal

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4042

HC-KAR

region of the abdomen. However, the accused has been in

custody since 29.12.2025. It is submitted that the

investigation is now completed and the charge sheet has been

filed. Therefore, the presence of the petitioner may not be

required for further custodial interrogation. Hence, considering

the facts and circumstances of the case, it prima facie appears

that the petitioner has made out grounds for grant of regular

bail.

7. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER i. The petition is allowed.

ii. The petitioner/accused No.1 is ordered to be

enlarged on bail in Murgod P.S.crime No.338/2025

for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2),

191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 109(1), 115(2), 118(2),

118(1), 49, 352, 351(2) and read with section 190

of BNS, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

NC: 2026:KHC-D:4042

HC-KAR

b) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission of the Court.

c) The petitioner shall not tamper and threaten the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

d) The petitioner shall mark his attendance before the concerned police station on every Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 02.00 p.m.

e) The petitioner shall attend the Court regularly during the trial without fail. If not attend for consecutive two times, it entails cancellation of bail.

f) Violation of any one of the conditions would entitle the prosecution to seek for cancellation of bail.

Sd/-

(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

ASN /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter