Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Sanjay Kumar J S vs State By Holehonnur Police Station
2026 Latest Caselaw 638 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 638 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr Sanjay Kumar J S vs State By Holehonnur Police Station on 31 January, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                -1-
                                                              NC: 2026:KHC:5492
                                                       CRL.P No. 15797 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15797 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                            483(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    MR SANJAY KUMAR J S
                            S/O SRIDHAR
                            AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
                            R/O JAMBARAGHATTE
                            HOLEHONNUR HOBLI, BHADRAVATHI
                            SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577 204.
                                                                  ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI K V SATEESHCHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE BY HOLEHONNUR POLICE STATION
                            BHADRAVATHI TALUK
                            SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 204.
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA             REPRESENTED BY:
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                            STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                            KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
                            BENGALURU - 560 001.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT

                      (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M M, HCGP)

                           THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.P.C
                      (UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.P
                      AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CC.No.8082/2025
                      ARISING OUT OF CR.No.203/2025 OF HOLEHONNUR P.S.,
                      PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
                      (JR.DN) AND JMFC-I, AT BHADRAVATHI, FOR THE OFFENCES
                               -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:5492
                                    CRL.P No. 15797 of 2025


HC-KAR




PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 3(2) AND 3(3) OF KARNATAKA
PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF INHUMAN EVIL PRACTICES
AND BLACK MAGIC BILL, 2017, U/S 118(1),103(1) R/W 3(5)
OF BNS, 2023 AND DIRECT THE PETITIONER BE RELEASE ON
BAIL.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                        ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.2 under Section

483 of BNSS, 2023 praying to grant bail in

S.C.No.5054/2025 (Crime No.203/2025 of Holehonnur

Police Station) pending on the file of IV Additional District

and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, sitting at Bhadravathi,

registered for offences punishable under Sections 103,

118(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and

under Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of Karnataka Prevention and

Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices and Black Magic Act,

2017.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

High Court Government Pleader for respondent - State.

NC: 2026:KHC:5492

HC-KAR

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend that

the allegation against the petitioner is that he took the

deceased who was his mother to accused Nos.1 and 3 to

protect her from devil and to make the devil to run away

from her body. There is another allegation that he asked

accused No.1 to do whatever she wants and he is not

worried even though her mother dies. There is no

allegation against the petitioner assaulting the deceased.

The petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.07.2025 and

as the charge sheet is filed, he is not required for custodial

interrogation. With these, he prays to allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned HCGP for respondent/State

would contend that CW.2 to 8 are eye witnesses to the

incident. Accused No.1 has assaulted the deceased. This

petitioner had taken the deceased who is the mother to

accused No.1 to protect her from devil. The charge sheet

material show prima-facie case against the petitioner for

the offence alleged against him. With this, she prayed for

dismissal of the petition.

NC: 2026:KHC:5492

HC-KAR

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has

perused the charge sheet and other materials placed on

record.

6. This Court while granting bail to accused No.2 in

the order dated 14.01.2026 passed in Crl.No.17330/2025

has observed as under:

6. The case of the prosecution is that, accused No.1 who is stated to have a godly power in collision with her husband, the petitioner/accused No.1 took Rs.5,000/- from accused No.2 to make the devil to run away from the body of the deceased and assaulted the deceased with stick from 09.00 p.m. on 06.07.2025 till 01.00 a.m. on 07.07.2025 and even the water is not given to the deceased after she demanded for water and causing death of the deceased. There is no overt act of any assault by the petitioner. The petitioner is husband of accused No.1 who is stated to have assaulted the deceased with stick. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.07.2025 and as the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

NC: 2026:KHC:5492

HC-KAR

7. The allegation against this petitioner/accused No.2

is that he took his mother to accused No.1 and gave

Rs.5,000/- to protect her mother from devil. The other

allegation against this petitioner is that he is not worried

even though life of his mother is taken away. There is no

overt act alleged against the petitioner assaulting the

deceased. The said allegation of assault is against

accused No.1. As the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner

is not required for further custodial interrogation. The

petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.07.2025. There

are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner has

made out case for grant of bail with conditions. In the

result, the following:

ORDER

The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is

granted bail in S.C.No.5054/2025 (Crime No.203/2025 of

Holehonnur Police Station) pending on the file of IV

NC: 2026:KHC:5492

HC-KAR

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, sitting

at Bhadravathi,, subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

iii) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter