Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Chiranjeevi S/O Kadasiddappa vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 601 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 601 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shri. Chiranjeevi S/O Kadasiddappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2026

Author: V.Srishananda
Bench: V.Srishananda
                                                    -1-
                                                                  NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109
                                                             CRL.P No. 104435 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
                           DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                              CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104435 OF 2025
                                     (438(CR.PC)/482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:
                      SHRI. CHIRANJEEVI S/O KADASIDDAPPA
                      AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE,
                      R/O. NITTUR VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA,
                      DIST. BALLARI-583122.
                                                                           ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. SRINAND A. PACHAPURE, ADVOCATE)
                      AND:
                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                           THROUGH TEKKALKOTE POLICE STATION, BALLARI,
                           NOW REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                           HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580011.

                      2.   VICTIM
                           R/O. NEAR SUNKLAMMA TEMPLTE
                           NITTUR VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA
                           DIST. BALLARI-583122.
                                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
                      (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1;
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench.
                      NOTICE SERVED TO R2)


                              THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
                      BNSS,     PRAYING   TO   GRANT      ANTICIPATORY   BAIL   TO   THE
                      PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1, IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME
                      NO.19/2025 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
                      SECTION 64(2)(M), 351(1), 351(2), 351 (3), 238 R/W SECTION 3(5)
                      OF BNS AND SECTION 67 (A) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT,
                      2000, BY TAKKALKOTA POLICE STATION BALLARI, PENDING ON THE
                                  -2-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109
                                          CRL.P No. 104435 of 2025


 HC-KAR



FILE OF ADDL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC, SIRUGUPPA IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.


      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                             ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

1. Heard Sri. Srinand A. Pachhapure, learned counsel

for petitioner and Sri P.N.Hatti, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent No.1-State.

2. Accused who has been shown as absconding accused

in the charge sheet filed in respect of Crime No.19/2025 of

Tekkalkota Police Station, is the petitioner who is seeking the

following relief:

"Wherefore, it is respectfully prayed before this Hon'ble Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused No.1, in the event of his arrest in Crime No.19/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 64(2)(m), 351(1), 351(2), 351(3), 238 read with Section 3(5) of BNS and Section 67(A) of Information Technology Act, 2000, by Takkalkota Police Station, Ballari, pending on the file of Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Siruguppa, in the interest of justice."

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109

HC-KAR

3. Facts in nutshell which are utmost necessary for

disposal of the present petition are as under:

4. A complaint came to be lodged by the victim girl with

Tekkalkota Police Station, contending that she is the resident of

Nittur Village, Siraguppa Taluk, Ballari District and she is residing

with her mother, elder brother in the house and her younger

sister is residing in B.C.M. Hostel, Siraguppa.

5. The present petitioner got acquainted with the victim

girl when the victim girl used to visit the public tap for washing

the clothes. After developing sufficient intimacy, the accused

took the victim girl to his house and in the guise of love affair,

had a forcible sexual intercourse with her and took photographs

of the intimate scenes.

6. It is further alleged in the complaint that keeping the

photographs with him, the accused started blackmailing her for

physical relationship as and when called and also threatened the

victim girl that if the incident is revealed to either her elder

brother or mother, she would take away their lives.

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109

HC-KAR

7. Accused also procured a mobile telephone to her and

used to call her whenever accused wanted to have the physical

relationship. The relationship between the accused and victim

girl somehow reached the ears of the family members of the

victim girl. The same was reported to the police on 11.03.2025

at about 08.30 p.m.

8. Police after registering the case in Crime No.19/2025

for the offences under Sections 64(2)(m), 351(1), 351(2),

351(3), 238 read with Section 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023 and Section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act,

investigated the matter and filed charge sheet and the accused

has been shown as absconding.

9. Attempt made by the accused to obtain an order of

grant of anticipatory bail was turned down by the learned Trial

Judge and thereafter, the petitioner is before this Court.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

victim was major and it is a consensual act and therefore, no

offence whatsoever could be attracted as is alleged against him

and therefore, sought for grant of anticipatory bail.

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109

HC-KAR

11. Per contra, Sri P.N.Hatti, learned High Court

Government Pleader opposes the bail grounds by contending that

it is not a case of love affair as no true lover would take the

photographs of intimate moments and blackmail the partner for

the purpose of continuous physical relationship and therefore,

sought for dismissal of the petition.

12. He would further contend that accused is a

absconding accused and therefore, this Court cannot grant bail

for an absconding accused by exercising power under Section

482 BNSS.

13. Having heard the arguments of both sides, this Court

perused the material on record meticulously.

14. On such perusal of the material on record, it is

crystal clear that there was intimacy developed between the

parties. However, the victim girl was enticed by the petitioner

herein to have the physical relationship in the guise of having a

love affair. Thereafter, he took photographs of the victim girl of

intimate scenes and was threatening the victim girl that if she

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109

HC-KAR

does not obey his instructions for the forcible sexual intercourse,

she would publicize the photographs of the intimate scenes.

15. When the blackmailing of the accused was unable to

be tolerated, complaint came to be lodged and police have

investigated the matter and filed charge sheet, showing the

accused as absconding.

16. In the first place, accused having been shown as the

absconding accused, he cannot be termed as a law-abiding

citizen so as to grant a special relief of anticipatory bail.

17. Secondly, assuming that the incident is a consensual

act on account of the love affair, no true lover would indulge in

taking photographs of intimate scenes and blackmail the victim

girl for forcible sexual intercourse.

18. Prima facie materials have been collected by the

investigation agency and the charge sheet is filed.

19. Under such circumstances, request of the petitioner

cannot be entertained.

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1109

HC-KAR

20. Accordingly, following:

ORDER

Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

SMM- upto para 10 CLK - para 11 to till end CT:CMU / LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 5

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter