Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Thippesha. R vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 589 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 589 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Thippesha. R vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:5089
                                                         CRL.P No. 17690 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17690 OF 2025
                                     [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)]
                      BETWEEN:

                            SRI. THIPPESHA R.
                            S/O RAMANNA,
                            AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                            R/AT: CHIKKERAHALLI VILLAGE,
                            MOLAKALMURU TALUK,
                            CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 535.
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. K.B.K. SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            THROUGH RAMPURA POLICE STATION,
                            REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                            HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Digitally signed by         BENGALURU - 560 001.
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              2.    SMT. UMADEVI
KARNATAKA                   W/O HULESHA,
                            AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
                            R/AT: CHIKKERAHALLI VILLAGE,
                            MOLAKALMURU TALUK,
                            CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 535.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1;
                      R2 - SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
                          THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
                      UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT REGULAR
                              -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:5089
                                   CRL.P No. 17690 of 2025


HC-KAR




BAIL IN SPL.C NO.54/2025 IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME
NO.06/2025, REGISTERED BY THE RAMPURA POLICE STATION,
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 137(2), 64(2)(m) AND 65(1) OF THE BHARATIYA
NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND UNDER SECTIONS 4 AND 6 OF THE
POCSO ACT, 2012 PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT CHITRADURGA.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by sole accused under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Spl.C.No.54/2025 (Crime No.6/2025 of

Rampura Police Station, Chitradurga) pending on the file

of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga,

registered for offences punishable under Sections 137(2),

64(2)(m) and 65(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and

under Sections 4 and 6 of Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent

NC: 2026:KHC:5089

HC-KAR

No.1 - State. Inspite of service of notice, respondent No.2

remained absent and unrepresented.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend

that, there was love affair between the petitioner and the

victim girl. The fact that the victim girl went on the bike of

the petitioner itself indicates that she voluntarily went

along with him. The victim girl in her statement recorded

under Section 183 of BNSS has stated that she is having

love affair with the petitioner and so also in the history

given before the doctor at the time of examination. The

victim girl has already been examined and therefore, there

is no question of any threat to the victim girl. As the

charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for

custodial interrogation. With these, he prayed to allow the

petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent No.1 - State would contend that,

the victim girl is aged fifteen (15) years. The consent of

NC: 2026:KHC:5089

HC-KAR

the victim girl is not consent for offences under the POCSO

Act. The charge sheet materials show that, there is a

prima-facie case against the petitioner for offences alleged

against him. With these, he prayed for dismissal of the

petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing

for parties, the Court has perused the charge sheet and

other materials placed on record.

6. The case of the prosecution is that, the

petitioner took the victim girl on his motorcycle and stayed

with her in the house of C.W.20 and C.W.21 on

20.01.2025, in the house of C.W.16 and C.W.17 from

21.01.2025 for five (5) days and had a sexual intercourse.

The petitioner again took her to the house of C.W.18 and

C.W.19 on 26.01.2025 and had sexual intercourse on her.

The victim girl is aged fifteen (15) years as on the date of

alleged offence and she was studying in X Std. The victim

girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS

NC: 2026:KHC:5089

HC-KAR

has stated that she is having love affair with the

petitioner. The victim girl has also stated in the history

before the doctor that she used to like the petitioner since

one year. The victim girl is of the age of understanding the

consequences of her acts. As the charge sheet is filed, the

petitioner is not required for further custodial

interrogation. The victim girl and the complainant have

already been examined. In the cross-examination, the

victim girl has stated that she had love affair with the

petitioner. There are no criminal antecedents of the

petitioner.

7. Considering all the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions. In

the result, the following;

ORDER The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is

granted bail in Spl.C.No.54/2025 (Crime No.6/2025 of

Rampura Police Station, Chitradurga) pending on the file

NC: 2026:KHC:5089

HC-KAR

of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga,

subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

iii) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted by the Court and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter