Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Ananda @ Ajith vs The State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 999 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 999 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Ananda @ Ajith vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                               NC: 2026:KHC:7455
                                                         CRL.P No. 16796 of 2025


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                                BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16796 OF 2025
                                     [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)]
                      BETWEEN:

                            SRI. ANANDA @ AJITH
                            S/O. LATE B.P. JAGANNATH,
                            AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
                            R/AT NO.13, 1ST MAIN,
                            GEF POST, AAVALAHALLI,
                            BENGALURU - 560 026.
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. SWAMY M.M., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            GIRINAGAR P.S.
                            BENGALURU CITY,
Digitally signed by         REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI             HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
                            BANGALORE - 560 001.
KARNATAKA

                      2.    SMT. KOMALA S.P.
                            W/O. SATHISH R.,
                            AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                            R/AT NO.9, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
                            NEAR THUNGAR BAR, AVALAHALLI,
                            BENGALURU - 560 026.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1;
                          R2 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
                            -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:7455
                                  CRL.P No. 16796 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 (FILED UNDER
SECTION 483 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRL.MISC.NO.9746/2025
(IN CRIME NO.343/2025) FILED BY THE RESPONDENT -
GIRINAGAR POLICE, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I, BENGALURU CITY, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 78 AND 126(2)
OF BNS AND SECTIONS 11(iv) AND 12 OF POCSO ACT, BY
ALLOWING THE ABOVE SAID PETITION.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by sole accused under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Crime No.343/2025 of Girinagar Police

Station registered for offences punishable under Sections

78 and 126(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and

Sections 11(iv) and 12 of Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act.

NC: 2026:KHC:7455

HC-KAR

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent

No.1 - State. Inspite of service of notice, respondent No.2

remained absent and unrepresented.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner would contend

that, the offence alleged against the petitioner is

punishable under Section 12 of POCSO Act is provided with

sentence of imprisonment which may extend to three (3)

years. The petitioner is in judicial custody since

29.10.2025. The allegation against the petitioner is that he

was following the victim girl and asking her to love him

and used to make signal with the hand. The charge sheet

has been filed and therefore the petitioner is not required

for further custodial interrogation. There are no criminal

antecedents of the petitioner. With these, he prayed to

allow the petition.

4. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader for respondent No.1 - State would contend that,

NC: 2026:KHC:7455

HC-KAR

the victim girl is aged seventeen (17) years. The petitioner

was following the victim girl and in that regard, the

parents of the victim girl have warned the petitioner.

Inspite of the said warning, he continued the said act of

following the victim girl and making signal by hand and

asking her to love him. The charge sheet materials show

that, there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner for

offences alleged against him. With these, he prayed for

dismissal of the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels appearing

for parties, the Court has perused the charge sheet and

other materials placed on record.

6. The case of the prosecution as per charge sheet

is that, the petitioner was following the victim girl and he

used to make signal by hand by showing heart symbol to

love him. The parents of the victim girl on coming to know

the same have warned the petitioner. Inspite of the said

warning, the petitioner on 29.10.2025 when the victim girl

NC: 2026:KHC:7455

HC-KAR

was returning from the college, at that time the petitioner

followed her, stopped her, asked her to love him and to

marry him.

7. The victim girl is aged seventeen (17) years.

The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section

11(iv) punishable under Section 12 of POCSO Act. The

punishment provided for offence under Section 12 of

POCSO Act is imprisonment which may extend to three (3)

years. There is no allegation of any sexual assault by the

petitioner. The investigation is over and charge sheet has

been filed and therefore, the petitioner is not required for

further custodial interrogation. The petitioner is in judicial

custody since 29.10.2025. There are no criminal

antecedents of the petitioner.

8. Considering all the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions. In

the result, the following;

NC: 2026:KHC:7455

HC-KAR

ORDER The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is

granted bail in Crime No.343/2025 of Girinagar Police

Station, subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one surety for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Court.

ii) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

iii) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted by the Court and cooperate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter