Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Malatesha R Eligar vs State Of Karnataka
2026 Latest Caselaw 953 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 953 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Malatesha R Eligar vs State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2026

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                 -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC:7003
                                                       CRL.P No. 13199 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13199 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC) /
                                            482(BNSS))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI. MALATESHA R ELIGAR
                            S/O R.T. ELIGAR
                            AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
                            OCC:DRIVER
                            R/AT NO.781/33, SARASWATHI NAGARA
                            DAVANAGERE-577 004

                      2.    SRI. RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR N
                            S/O NAGARAJ M.H
                            AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
                            OCC:DRIVER
                            R/AT DOOR NO.514/14
                            RAVIKIRAN, MOUNESHWARA BADAVANE
                            NITTUVALLI, OPP. SHAKTHI GAS GODOWN
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA
                            DAVANAGERE-577 008
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              3.    SMT. MANJULA @ MANJULA N
KARNATAKA
                            W/O NAGARAJ M.H
                            AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
                            R/AT DOOR NO.514/14
                            RAVIKIRAN, MOUNESHWARA BADAVANE
                            NITTUVALLI, OPP. SHAKTHI GAS GODOWN
                            DAVANAGERE-577 008
                                                                   ...PETITIONERS
                      (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V.B, ADVOCATE)
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2026:KHC:7003
                                  CRL.P No. 13199 of 2025


HC-KAR




AND:

1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     THROUGH PSI
     EXTENSION DAVANAGERE POLICE
     DAVANAGERE, PJ EXTENSION
     OLD COURT ROAD
     NEAR GOVT. HIGH SCHOOL GROUND
     DAVANAGERE-577 002

     REPRESENTED BY
     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
     HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING
     BENGALURU-560 001

2.   SMT. SUNANDA S
     W/O SHANMUKHAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
     R/AT SHREE KANAKA
     3RD MAIN, KTJ NAGARA
     DAVANAGERE-577 002
                                          ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1;
    SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C
(FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT
ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS HEREIN BY
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT - DAVANAGERE EXTENSION P.S.
DAVANAGERE IN CR.NO.151/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 465, 471, 468, 420 R/W
34 OF I.P.C PENDING ON THE FILE OF 2ND ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE
AND J.M.F.C COURT, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                              -3-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC:7003
                                   CRL.P No. 13199 of 2025


HC-KAR




                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 under

Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in

Crime No.151/2025 of Davanagere Extension Police

Station, registered for offences punishable under Section

406, 465, 471, 468, 420 read with 34 IPC.

2. Heard learned the counsel for the petitioners,

learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Addl.SPP

for respondent No.1/State.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners would contend that

the allegation against the petitioners of issuing fake

licenses pertains to the year 2016-2017. The complaint

has been filed in the year 2025. There is a delay in filing

the complaint. The offences alleged against the petitioners

are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for

life. The petitioners are ready to co-operate with the IO in

the investigation and abide by the conditions to be

imposed by this Court. There are no criminal antecedents

NC: 2026:KHC:7003

HC-KAR

of the petitioners. With this he prayed to allow the

petition.

4. Learned Addl.SPP for respondent No.1/State would

contend that the petitioners have been assigned with work

of giving driving training and issuing certificate. But

without giving training, issued fake certificates and got

driving licence issued in collusion with the contract

employees of RTO and cheating the State and getting

benefit out of that. The petitioners are required for

custodial interrogation. With this he prayed to reject the

petition.

5. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 reiterated

the contentions raised by learned Additional SPP.

6. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court has

perused the FIR, complaint and other materials placed on

record.

7. On perusal of the averments of the complaint, the

work assigned to the driving school run by the petitioners

NC: 2026:KHC:7003

HC-KAR

of giving driving training and issuing certificate pertains to

the year 2016 -17. The allegations against the petitioners

is that they, without giving a driving training, have issued

fake certificates and got issued driving licences in collusion

with the contract employees of RTO. The case of the

prosecution is based on documents. The offences alleged

against the petitioners are not punishable either with

death or imprisonment for life. The petitioners have

undertaken to co-operate with the IO in the investigation

and abide by any conditions to be imposed by the Court.

There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

8. Considering the above aspects, the petitioners

have made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with

conditions. In the result, the following:

ORDER

Petition is allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be

released on bail, in the event of their arrest, in Crime

NC: 2026:KHC:7003

HC-KAR

No.151/2025 of Davanagere Extension Police Station,

subject to following conditions:

(i) Petitioners shall voluntarily appear before the IO within 15 days from this day and execute bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with like-sum surety to the satisfaction of the IO.

(ii) Petitioners shall appear before the IO on every Sunday for a period of two months between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m. or till filing of the final report whichever is earlier.

(iii) Petitioners shall co-operate with the IO in the investigation and appear before the IO whenever called for.

(iv) Petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(v) In case of filing of the charge sheet, the petitioners shall appear before the trial

NC: 2026:KHC:7003

HC-KAR

Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and co-operate for speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter