Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vanamala vs Manjunath.B. Thalwars
2026 Latest Caselaw 3031 Kant

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3031 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Vanamala vs Manjunath.B. Thalwars on 7 April, 2026

                                                -1-
                                                             NC: 2026:KHC:19087
                                                           M.F.A. No.7123/2019


                   HC-KAR




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                            DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
                                            BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7123/2019 (MV-D)


                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    VANAMALA
                         W/O SUBRAMANI
                         AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.

                   2.    NADIYA
Digitally signed         AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
by ARSHIFA
BAHAR                    S/O SUBRAMANI.
KHANAM
Location: HIGH           BOTH ARE R/AT INDIRA NAGAR
COURT OF                 RANGENAHALLI POST
KARNATAKA                TARIKERE TALUK
                         CHIKMANGALORE DIST.

                                                                  ...APPELLANTS
                   (BY SRI. NAGARAJA HEGDE, ADV.,)


                   AND:

                   1.    MANJUNATH B. THALWARS
                         R/AT NEAR RACHOTESHWARA TEMPLE
                         KERUR VILLAGE, BADAMI TALUK
                         BAGALKOTE DIST.

                   2.    THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL
                         INSURANCE CO., LTD.
                         H.O. DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR
                         NO.2 N.S.C BASE ROAD
                         CHENNAI 600 001
                         REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.
                                -2-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC:19087
                                         M.F.A. No.7123/2019


HC-KAR




3.   THE PRESIDENT NERALU CHARITABLE TRUST
     GIDMAVINAKATTE YEDALLI
     SIRSI U.K.

4.   UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD
     KUNDAPURA BRANCH
     NH66, LAXMIVENKATESH COMPLEX
     VODERHOBLI, KUNDAPURA
     REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.B. RAJU, ADV., FOR R4
    SRI. D. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV., FOR R2
R1 AND R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.01.2019 PASSED IN MVC
NO.361/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, UDUPI (SITTING AT
KUNDAPURA), KUNDAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

                      ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the claimants challenging the

judgment and award dated 17.01.2019 passed in

MVC.No.361/2017 by the Additional District Judge and

Additional MACT, Udupi (Sitting at Kundapura), Kundapura

(for short 'the Tribunal').

NC: 2026:KHC:19087

HC-KAR

2. Though this appeal is listed for admission, with

the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, it is

taken up for final disposal.

3. Heard Sri.Nagaraja Hegde, learned counsel

appearing for the appellants, Sri.D.Vijaya Kumar, learned

counsel for respondent No.2, Sri.P. B.Raju, learned counsel

for respondent No.4 and meticulously perused the material

available on record.

4. This appeal is by the claimants only to the

limited extent with regard to the assessment of the

income of the deceased. The Tribunal assessed the income

at Rs.9,000/- per month by ignoring the oral and

documentary evidence on record, more particularly

Exs.P13 to P15. It is to be noticed that the deceased was

aged about 24 years at the time of the accident and was

employed as a mechanic at J.S. Fabricator, Bengaluru,

earning Rs.15,000/- per month. The Tribunal, however,

disbelieved the said evidence on the ground that the no

NC: 2026:KHC:19087

HC-KAR

corroborative material evidence was produced. The

appellants/claimants had specifically contended that the

deceased was working under Sri P.M. John, owner of J.S.

Fabricator, Bengaluru. In support of this contention, PW3 -

P.M. John was examined, who clearly deposed that the

deceased was employed with him as a mechanic.

5. Considering the oral and documentary evidence

on record, including the testimony of PW3, I am of the

considered view that the deceased is required to be

treated as a skilled labour and as the accident is of the

year 2016, it would be appropriate to reassess the income

of the deceased at Rs.13,000/- per month. Having

reassessed the income and considering the age of the

deceased as 24 years, the appellants-claimants are

entitled to an addition of 40% of the assessed income

under the head of loss of future prospects and the

appropriate multiplier applicable would be 18, which has

been rightly considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has

erred in considering the deductions as 1/3rd. It is not in

NC: 2026:KHC:19087

HC-KAR

dispute that the deceased was a bachelor at the time of

the accident; therefore, an appropriate deduction would be

50% of the assessed income towards the personal and

living expenses of the deceased. Accordingly, the

appellants-claimants are entitled to compensation under

the head of loss of dependency as under:

13,000 + 40% X 12 X 18 - 50% = Rs.19,65,600/-

6. The appellants-claimants are also entitled to a

sum of Rs.16,500/- under the head of 'loss of estate' and

Rs.16,500/- under the head of 'funeral expenses &

transportation of dead body' including 10% escalation.

Further, the appellants-claimants, being the mother and

the unmarried sister of the deceased, are each entitled to

a sum of Rs.44,000/- towards loss of consortium

including 10% escalation.

7. Thus, in all, the appellants-claimants shall be

entitled to modified compensation under the following

heads:

NC: 2026:KHC:19087

HC-KAR

HEADS AMOUNT (in Rs.) Loss of dependency 19,65,600/- Loss of consortium (Rs.44,000 X 2) 88,000/- Transportation of dead body & funeral 16,500/-

    expenses
    Loss of estate                                            16,500/-
                       Total                              20,86,600/-

Thus, the claimants shall be entitled to a total

compensation of Rs.20,86,600/- as against

Rs.18,84,400/- awarded by the Tribunal.

8. In the result, this Court proceeds to pass the

following:

ORDER

a) Appeal is allowed in part.

b) The impugned judgment and award of the

Tribunal is modified to an extent that the

claimants would be entitled to total

compensation of Rs.20,86,600/- as

against Rs.18,84,400/- awarded by the

Tribunal.

c) The compensation amount shall carry

interest at the rate of 6% per annum from

NC: 2026:KHC:19087

HC-KAR

the date of petition till the date of

payment.

d) The Respondent Nos.2 and 4 are jointly

and severally liable to pay 50% each

compensation with costs and interest.

Both the respondents shall deposit 50% of

the enhanced compensation amount with

accrued interest before the Tribunal within

a period of six weeks from the date of

receipt of certified copy of this judgment.

e) The apportionment, deposit and

disbursement shall be made as per award

of the Tribunal.

f) Draw modified award accordingly.

Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

ABK/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter