Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2950 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2026
-1-
WP No.426/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO.426 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
MS.HRUTHVIKA BALACHANDRA RAJU,
D/O.MR.BALACHANDRA RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
R/AT NO.5, LAKSHMI KANTHA NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, CHIKKAMRANAHALLI,
DOLLARS COLONY, RMV II STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 094. ....PETITIONER
(BY SRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY (KEA),
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
SAMPIGE ROAD, 18TH CROSS,
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 012.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
3. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION (NMC),
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
POCKET-14, SECTOR-8, DWARKA PHASE-I,
NEW DELHI- 110 077.
4. THE OXFORD MEDICAL COLLEGE,
HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE,
REP. BY ITS DEAN/PRINCIAL,
YADAVANAHALLI, ATTIBELE HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562 107.
5. MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE,
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES,
-2-
WP No.426/2026
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NO.354,
NIRMAN BHAVAN, DELHI-110 011
REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT.MAMATHA SHETTY., AGA FOR R2;
SRI H.R.SHOWRI, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SMT.PAVITHRA S.G., ADVCOATE FOR R4;
SRI H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGJ FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.1 KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT THE SURRENDER OF THE MBBS SEAT ALLOTTED TO THE PETITIONER IN KEA ROUND-4 (STRAY VACANCY ROUND) FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2025-26 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS COMING ON FOR 'PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER' THIS DAY, JAYANT BANERJI J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
CAV ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
The instant petition has been filed seeking the following
reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No.1 Karnataka Examinations Authority to accept the surrender of the MBBS seat allotted to the Petitioner in KEA Round-4 (Stray Vacancy Round) for the academic year 2025-26;
ii. Declare that the surrender of the MBBS seat by the Petitioner, having been sought within the same
counselling cycle and before finalization of admissions, is valid and binding, and that the said seat shall be treated as not consumed and liable to be re-allotted in accordance with law;
iii. Declare that the provisions relating to forfeiture of fees and absolute bar on surrender are inapplicable to the Petitioner's case, as the counselling process had not attained finality at the relevant point of time;
iv. Direct Respondent No.1 and the Respondent No.4 to refund and/or adjust all refundable fees paid by the Petitioner, including tuition fee and any other amounts, in accordance with KEA rules and guidelines, within a stipulated time-frame;
v. Direct Respondent No.4 - The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bengaluru, to return all original educational documents of the Petitioner forthwith, without insisting upon any penalty, No Objection Certificate, or undertaking;
vi. Declare that the Petitioner shall not be disqualified, debarred, or rendered ineligible to appear for NEET- UG 2026 or to participate in MBBS counselling conducted by KEA or any other competent authority for the subsequent academic year, on the ground of the present allotment or surrender;
vii. Declare that the action and inaction of Respondent No.1 in refusing to accept the Petitioner's surrender while accepting surrender of other similarly placed
candidates is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India;
viii. Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including costs, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Petitioner is NEET-UG 2025 qualified candidate,
aspiring to pursue Medical or Dental Course through the
counselling conducted by respondent No.1- KEA1. Petitioner
submitted an online application to KEA and all the original
documents were verified. In the first round of counselling
conducted by KEA, the petitioner was allotted a BDS seat under
the NRI quota at M.S.Ramaiah Dental College, Bengaluru. The
petitioner reported to the said institution pursuant to the
allotment and paid the prescribed fees.
3. However after completion of the second round of
counselling and upon announcement of the third round of
counselling, the petitioner noticed that several MBBS seats
under the Management Quota had remained vacant and that
additional MBBS seats were also introduced for consideration in
the third round which were not available at the time when the
petitioner had exercised her options and frozen the BDS seat.
Karnataka Examinations Authority
4. To explore the possibility of securing an MBBS seat
without prematurely surrendering the BDS seat already
allotted, the petitioner submitted representations dated
08.10.2025 and 28.10.2025 to the KEA seeking permission to
participate in the third round of counselling while retaining the
existing BDS seat as a 'fall-back' option. The petitioner was not
permitted to participate in the third round of counselling.
Thereafter she was specifically informed by the officials of the
KEA that if she surrendered the BDS seat, she would be
permitted to participate in the final round of counselling for
MBBS seat. On the basis of such assurance, with a bona-fide
intention to pursue MBBS, the petitioner voluntarily
surrendered the BDS seat allotted to her. KEA accordingly
issued a seat cancellation/endorsement dated 28.10.2025
cancelling the BDS (NRI quota) seat allotted to the petitioner as
aforesaid bearing seat cancellation No.1673 and recording
refund particulars. The endorsement however contains a
condition that the petitioner would not be eligible to participate
in any further rounds of KEA counselling for the BDS course.
5. Due to a stay order passed by this Court in separate
proceedings, the third round was not conducted as per the
original schedule. It was conducted by the KEA belatedly only
after completion of all rounds of counselling by the MCC2
(Respondent No.5 herein) at the all India level.
6. Thereafter, KEA issued notifications dated
12.12.2025 and 15.12.2025 notifying the conduct of online
stray vacancy round of counselling for UG NEET-2025 for
vacant Medical and Dental seats. Pursuant thereto the option
entry and allotment process for a stray vacancy round was
conducted as per the schedule. The petitioner was permitted to
participate only in the stray vacancy round for MBBS seat. She
was allotted an MBBS seat on 17.12.2025 in respondent No.4-
College under 'OTH' (Other/Management Quota) category. An
admission order dated 17.12.2025 was issued by the KEA
stipulating that if a candidate wish to surrender, cancel or leave
the seat allotted by KEA, it must be effected only before KEA by
surrendering the original admission order. Mere non-reporting
to the allotted Institution shall not be construed as surrender of
the seat. It was also clarified that surrender at the Institution
level is impermissible and failure to surrender before KEA may
amount to blocking of seats.
7. The petitioner paid the prescribed fees as per the
directions of the KEA which is stated to be a sum of
Medical Counselling Committee
₹10,04,650/- towards KEA counselling/tuition fee on
16.08.2025 and a further sum of ₹42,00,000/- towards tuition
fee to KEA by a Demand Draft dated 21.12.2025.
8. The MCC issued a notice dated 17.12.2025
announcing the conduct of a Special Stray Vacancy Round of
UG counselling 2025, in view of the fact that several MBBS
seats had remained vacant due to non-joining/non-reporting of
candidates even after completion of the stray vacancy round. It
was notified that the special stray vacancy round would be
conducted in online mode for vacant MBBS seats and the said
round would be conducted jointly for MBBS, BDS and B.Sc
(Nursing) courses to ensure that precious medical seats do not
go waste. A detailed counselling schedule was also notified
which was to continue upto 10.01.2026.
9. The KEA issued an independent notification dated
16.12.2025 notifying conduct of online second stray vacancy
round of counselling for medical seats 2025. Yet another
notification dated 23.12.2025 was again issued by the KEA for
the same purpose. In view of the developments, the petitioner
sent a representation dated 24.12.2025 to the KEA seeking
acceptance of surrender of MBBS seats allotted to her in KEA
round four as well as for inclusion of the said seat in the
ensuing special/round five stray vacancy counselling, non-
forfeiture and refund of refundable fees. Also sought was return
of original documents and confirmation that such surrender
would not operate as a bar for NEET- UG 2026.
10. The KEA issued an updated notification of
26.12.2025 in which it was stated that the Principal of SDM
Medical College, Dharwad had informed KEA that one candidate
had withdrawn a seat at the institution level and on that basis
requested KEA to include the seat in the special stray vacancy
round of counselling scheduled on 29.12.2025. Acting on the
said request, KEA accepted the withdrawal and included the
SDM Medical College seat for allotment, notwithstanding the
fact that the concerned candidate had not surrendered the seat
before KEA.
11. It is submitted that no reply was sent in respect of
the petitioner's representation despite the petitioner having
personally met KEA officials on 24.12.2025 and repeatedly
remaining present at the KEA office on several subsequent
days. It is stated that the KEA proceeded to complete the
allotment process of the special stray vacancy round without
accepting the petitioner's surrender and without including the
MBBS seat allotted to the petitioner for re-counselling, thereby
foreclosing the possibility of the seat being allotted to otherwise
to another eligible candidate and rendering the petitioner
remediless.
12. The petitioner addressed an email dated
03.01.2026 to respondent No.4-College, forwarding the earlier
representations and correspondence addressed to KEA
reiterating that the request for acceptance of surrender was
pending consideration before KEA.
13. In response, respondent No.4 issued a reply dated
05.01.2026 addressed to KEA stating that the petitioner had
reported and completed the admission formalities, that the
request for cancellation had been forwarded to KEA for seeking
clarification from KEA as to whether cancellation was
permissible and, if so, requesting that a replacement candidate
be allotted at the earliest.
14. Yet another detailed representation dated
06.01.2026 was made to the KEA. However, the KEA failed to
issue any written reply or decision.
- 10 -
15. It is the contention of learned Counsel for the
petitioner that the action and inaction of KEA is arbitrary and
discriminatory. On the one hand it accepted the withdrawal of
another candidate from SDM Medical College, Dharwad on
26.12.2025 and immediately included that seat in the special
stray vacancy counselling. While, on the other hand, detailed
representation dated 24.12.2025 moved by the petitioner was
not responded to at all. It is stated that the notification of the
KEA dated 26.12.2025 itself demonstrated that surrender of
seats was permitted during the counselling process and
included the surrendered seats in the special stray vacancy
round. It is submitted that the petitioner's surrender request
was made within the same counselling year and before
finalisation of the counselling, which is outside the
disqualification clause. The seat could have been reallocated. It
is submitted that the embargo in the participation in the
subsequent years in counselling would operate only where a
candidate consumes or blocks a seat for the academic year,
which was not the case in the case of the petitioner.
16. The KEA has filed its statement of objections. The
allotment of BDS seat to the petitioner, which was
subsequently cancelled, is admitted. It is also admitted that
- 11 -
a stray vacancy round was conducted to fill up the remaining
unfilled seats in which the petitioner was allowed to participate.
She entered 31 options for the available seats and as per her
ranking and priority options entered on 15.12.2025 she was
allotted a seat in respondent No.4-College. The petitioner had
accepted the seat by downloading the admission order and paid
the prescribed fee and joined the allotted college. Her name
was also sent by the KEA to the MCC on 17.12.2025 along with
a list of already admitted students. It is stated that with this
process the entire admission process of the petitioner to the
adopted college was completed; that under the circumstances
there is no provision to surrender the seat after completion of
the admission process and therefore she is not entitled for
refund of the fee or for granting any undue relaxation of norms.
17. As regards the Special Stray Vacancy Round of
Counselling in respect of vacancies in three medical colleges, it
is stated by the KEA that the petitioner is trying to take
advantage of this opportunity to contend that the counselling
process had not attained finality and the process is a continuing
one. It is stated that each round of counselling is a separate
round and fresh option entry was permitted to those students
who are eligible to participate in the stray vacancy round.
- 12 -
18. As regards the vacant seat arising in the SDM
College, it is stated by the KEA that one student who was
admitted in the second round had withdrawn from the course
on medical ground. Therefore the request was made for filling
up the seat. Accordingly, the KEA included that seat of SDM
College as all the seats available in all colleges had to be filled
up only through a single counselling agency in terms of
Regulation 12 of the Graduate Medical Education Regulation,
2023 within the stipulated last date for admission. Since the
vacancy had arisen before the last date for admission stipulated
by MCC which was 10.01.2026, the KEA conducted the Special
Stray Vacancy Round of counselling on 29.12.2025 for 8 vacant
seats in 3 medical colleges and allotted all the vacant seats to
eligible students on 29.12.2025. Thereafter, KEA did not
conduct any counselling. It is stated that the vacancy that
arose in SDM College is not a case of surrender by a candidate,
but it is a case of abandonment of the course by a candidate
after taking admission.
19. It is stated that the petitioner's request dated
24.12.2025 for surrender of the seat was not considered as she
had completed the admission process and her name was
included in the list of completed admission on 17.12.2025.
- 13 -
Having participated in the counselling and having selected a
seat of her choice, it is stated that the petitioner cannot seek
surrender of the seat at this juncture. Had she not participated
in the counselling, any other eligible interested student would
have taken the seat allotted to the petitioner. It is stated that if
such an indulgence is granted, it would create a precedent
where students, after completion of the admission process,
start surrendering the seats and seek a fresh round of
counselling which would result in unsettling the entire settled
counselling process for admission to professional courses.
20. A statement of objections has also been filed on
behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in which it is stated that the
Respondent No. 2 is a formal party. The Department of medical
education, through the directorate of medical education, only
draws up and prepares a seat matrix every year for counselling
and admission to MBBS seats in the state. This information is
conveyed to the KEA which, in turn and on its own, carries out
the process of counselling and admission to MBBS seats.
21. A perusal of the record reflects that the additional
bulletin, which is enclosed as Annexure A to the petition,
containing the Instructions and Guidelines to apply online,
- 14 -
verification pertaining to UGNEET - 2025 admission to Medical,
Dental, Ayurveda, Unani and Homeopathy courses for the year
2025 was published by Respondent No.1-KEA. As reflected in
the preamble to the bulletin, KEA was inviting applications
online from the eligible candidates who have qualified UGNEET
2025, for admission to Medical/Dental courses in Government
Medical and Dental Colleges, Government quota seats in Private
and Minority Medical and Dental colleges and all seats in Private
Medical and Dental Colleges (KPCF, KRLMPCA, AMPCK) located
in the State of Karnataka for the academic year 2025 - 26. It is
mentioned therein that centralised counselling for the seats to
be notified by the Karnataka State government, in
Government, KPCF, KRLMPCA, AMPCK institutions, the
admissions would be as per the Karnataka Selection of
Candidates for Admission to Government Seats in Professional
Educational Institutions Rules, 20063, as amended from time
to time and as per the guidelines of MCI/DCI/Ministry of Health
and Family Welfare/Government of India/Medical Education,
Karnataka/Director Medical Education, Karnataka/Entrance Test
Committee.
Karnataka Rules 2006
- 15 -
22. There is a disclaimer stating that the details and
instructions contained in this information booklet (bulletin) are
subject to the rules and government orders. In case of any
discrepancy, the rules shall prevail and the decision of
NMC/MCC/DCI/Government/Competent Authority/Universities/
Karnataka Examinations Authority/Entrance Test Committee
shall be final.
23. The important information provided in the bulletin
states that a candidate may have option to select
medical/engineering etc, seat in other boards. In case such
candidate wishes to confirm the seat selected from other
boards then such candidate who has also been allotted a seat
through KEA has to surrender the seat allotted by KEA before
the last date fixed for modifying of options of 2nd round of seat
allotment, failing which it may amount to blocking of seat and
KEA may initiate action/proceedings against such candidates. It
was also stated that if a candidate decides to surrender the
seat, he/she has to surrender the seat only to KEA in writing.
24. The online application form of the petitioner has
been filed. She has applied as NRI-Ward. In the letter dated
8.10.2025 the petitioner wrote to the Executive Director of the
- 16 -
KEA that after she had frozen the BDS seat under the NRI
quota in the First Round, KEA announced the addition of new
MBBS seats just before Round 2. She requested permission to
participate in the Round 3 counselling to explore the available
options and to allow her to retain her existing BDS seat as a
fallback until a new allotment is confirmed.
25. Annexure D to the petition is the Seat Cancellation
Order of the petitioner in which it appears that the seat in
allotted course of BDS-NRI was cancelled by the KEA on
28.10.2025. It was stated that action would be taken to refund
the amount, if any. Annexure E1 is a notification dated
12.12.2025 of the KEA intimating that the date for entering the
options of the online Stray Vacancy Round of seat allotment for
admission to UG Medical and Dental seats for the year 2025
had been extended till 10.00 AM on 13.12.2025. Annexure E2
is a notification of KEA dated 15.12.2025 stating that the date
was extended till 11.00 AM on 15.12.2025 to enter the options
for the online Stray Vacancy Round of seat allotment for
admission to UG Medical and Dental seats for the year 2025,
and that the provisional result of the Stray Vacancy Round
would be 16.12.2025 after 11.00 AM. The schedule of further
- 17 -
procedure to be taken by the candidates who had been allotted
seats after the final result was specified.
26. By means of an admission order dated 17.12.2025
issued by the KEA, the petitioner was admitted to the
Respondent no.4-College. It reflected that the course fee paid
by the petitioner was ₹36,11,950/-. It is mentioned therein that
in case the candidate wishes to surrender/cancel/leave the
selection from KEA because she has other opportunities for
educational/professional courses, then such candidate has to
surrender the seat allotted by KEA to KEA only by surrendering
that admission order, failing which it could amount to blocking
of seat and the Government may initiate both civil and criminal
action against such candidate and parents as the seat is a
subsidized Government Quota seat and there are other equally
meritorious students in the merit queue who should have
secured that seat. Merely not reporting to allotted college
should not be presumed by the candidate that she had
surrendered the seat to KEA. Fee collected by KEA would be
transferred to concerned college after final admission process.
In case the allotted college/ institution demanded over and
above the fee fixed by the State Government, the candidate
could approach the fee Regulatory Committee.
- 18 -
27. On 17.12.2025, a notice was issued by the MCC
with regard to UG counselling 2025 that some MBBS seats were
still lying vacant due to non-joining/non-reporting after the
completion of stray vacancy round of UG counselling 2025. The
competent authority had decided to conduct a special stray
vacancy round for the vacant MBBS seats in the online mode so
that the precious medical seats do not go waste. The rule
position for the special stray vacancy round was stated to be,
inter alia, that candidates who are not holding any seat in
earlier rounds of all India quota and state quota were eligible to
participate. Hence, candidates who are holding any seat in
earlier rounds of all India quota and state quota irrespective of
the course allotted are not eligible to participate. The list of
candidates allotted seats in the special stray vacancy round
would be shared with state counselling authorities and such
candidates would be debarred from taking admission in special
stray vacancy round of state counselling.
28. The schedule for admission was accordingly
published, in which the round 5 of counselling, both for All India
quota and State Counselling, was from 01.01.2026 to
03.01.2026. The last date of joining was 10.01.2026.
- 19 -
29. The KEA by a notification dated 16.12.2025
informed about a 2nd stray vacancy round for medical seats -
2025. It was stated therein that after the seat allotment in the
stray vacancy round the mentioned OTH category seats in 2
medical colleges remained unfilled. It was stated that
candidates who had not been allotted any medical seat in any
of the previous rounds and who were interested in the OTH
category medical seats could appear on 17.12.2025 in person
to KEA and produce all the original documents etc. Thereafter,
such candidates would only be permitted to enter the options
for those two colleges only and seat allotment results would be
published on the same day. The college, category and fees
were specified as follows:-
College Category Fees M.V.J. Medical College and Research OTH - 22 seats ₹40,11,950/- Hospital, NH-4, Dandupalya, Kolathur, Channasandra, Bangalore Mahadevappa Rampure Medical OTH - 04 seats ₹39,11,950/- College, Mahadevappa Rampure Marg, Kalaburgi
30. Thereafter, again on 23.12.2025, a notification was
issued by the KEA regarding online special stray vacancy round
for medical seats - 2025. It referred to the extension for the
last date for admission to medical courses being made by the
MCC and that the round would be conducted for the 07 OTH
- 20 -
vacant medical seats after allotment of seats in the stray
vacancy round. It was reiterated that candidates who have not
been allotted any medical seat in any of the previous rounds
and who are interested in these OTH category medical seats
could appear on 29.12.2025 in person to KEA and produce all
the original documents et cetera. Such candidates would only
be permitted to enter the options for the 2 noted colleges only
and seat allotment results would be published on the same day.
The names of the colleges , etc. mentioned are as follows:
College Category Fees
M.V.J. Medical College and Research OTH - 05 ₹40,11,950/-
Hospital, NH-4, Dandupalya, Kolathur, seats Channasandra, Bangalore Mahadevappa Rampure Medical OTH - 02 ₹39,11,950/- College, Mahadevappa Rampure Marg, seats Kalaburgi
31. It is thereafter that the petitioner wrote to the KEA
on 24.12.2025 seeking acceptance of surrender of MBBS seat
allotted in Round 4 and inclusion of the seat in Round 5/
Special Stray vacancy counselling with request for non-
forfeiture and refund of refundable fees.
32. It is pertinent to mention here that the last date for
admission stipulated by MCC was 10.01.2026. The instant
petition was filed on 08.01.2026, that is, just 2 days prior to
the last date for admission stipulated by MCC. The stipulation in
- 21 -
the notice dated 17.12.2025 issued by the MCC as well and the
notices issued by the KEA on 16.12.2025 and 23.12.2025 is
that the round/s of counselling (2nd stray vacancy
round/Special Stray vacancy round) would be available to only
those candidates who have not been allotted any medical seats
in any of the previous rounds. The petitioner was therefore
ineligible to participate in the special stray vacancy, in view of
the fact that she had already secured a seat by allotment under
the NRI quota in the respondent no.4-College which she had
joined on 17.12.2025.
33. Moreover, the petitioner is seeking to draw parity
with the case of one candidate of SDM Medical College which
finds a reference in a notification of the KEA dated 26.12.2025.
As a matter of fact, it does not help the case of the petitioner at
all. As is evident from the notification, the principal of SDM
medical College had submitted a request to KEA that a
candidate had withdrawn one seat allotted in the OTH category
and request was made by the college to consider the said seat
for seat allotment under the special stray vacancy round.
Therefore, in this notification, the KEA added one seat of SDM
College. It is not the case of the petitioner that the candidate
- 22 -
who had withdrawn the seat had participated in the special
stray vacancy round conducted by the KEA.
34. As far as the contents of the admission order of the
petitioner dated 17.12.2025 issued by the KEA is concerned, it
is clear from a careful perusal of the same that the contents
were general in nature and not specific to the petitioner. The
reference made therein to the surrender of the admission order
can only be where the bulletin/brochure of the KEA and the
Karnataka Rules, 2006 permit such a surrender, which does not
exist in the case of the petitioner.
35. Under the facts and circumstances the petitioner
has failed to make out a case for interference in writ
jurisdiction. The KEA as justifiably not considered the case of
the petitioner for surrender of the allotted seat in the
Respondent No. 4 - College.
36. This writ petition is therefore dismissed.
Sd/-
(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/-
(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE KSR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!