Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Manager vs S. N. Ramegowda Alias Rajanna
2025 Latest Caselaw 8776 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8776 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2025

Karnataka High Court

The Manager vs S. N. Ramegowda Alias Rajanna on 24 September, 2025

                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC:38499
                                                         MFA No. 3523 of 2018


                      HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3523 OF 2018(MV-I)


                      BETWEEN:


                      THE MANAGER
                      RELINACE GIC LTD.,
                      OFFICE AT 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR,
                      MAGNANUR COMMERCIAL COMPLEX,
                      NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND, B.D. ROAD
                      CHITRADURGA,
                      ALSO BANGALORE OFFICE AT:
                      11TH MAIN, III BLOCK,
                      2ND FLOOR, S. M. TOWERS,
                      JAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-11
                      NOW REP. BY
                      LEGAL MANAGER,
                      RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
Digitally signed by
                      REGIONAL OFICE, 5TH FLOOR,
LAKSHMINARAYANA       CENTENARY BUILDING,
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                      NO.28, M G ROAD,
COURT OF              BANGALORE - 5600
KARNATAKA
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:


                      1.    S. N. RAMEGOWDA ALIAS RAJANNA,
                            S/O LATE NANJAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
                            R/AT SUKLAPURA VILLAGE,
                            MADIHALLI POST,
                            KASABA HOBLI,
                           -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC:38499
                                   MFA No. 3523 of 2018


HC-KAR




     TURUKEVERE TALUK,
     TUMKUR DIST.
     KARNATAKA STATE
     AND ALSO AT
     C/O SHIVANANJEGOWDA
     NO.3, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
     2ND CROSS, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
     BAGALAKUNTE BUS STOP,
     BHUNESHWARINAGAR,
     BEHIDN SRI SAI KALYANA MANTAPA
     BANGALORE - 560 057

2.   SRI RAJAPPA
     S/O SHANTHAPPA,
     NOW AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
     R/AT HOLALKERE ROAD,
     NEAR BARIGERAMMA TEMPLE,
     HONDADA AREA,
     CHITRADURGA TOWN,
     CHITRADURGA - 577 501
     KARNATAKA STATE
                                          ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M. S. MOHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
    V/O DATED 11.10.2023 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R2 D/W)


     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.02.2018
PASSED IN MVC NO. 8242/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE 21ST
ACMM & 23RD ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE, MACT,
BENGALURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.7,25,500/-
WITH INTEREST AT 8% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL
THE DATE OF DEPOSIT.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA
                                     -3-
                                                     NC: 2025:KHC:38499
                                               MFA No. 3523 of 2018


HC-KAR




                           ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Heard arguments of learned counsel appearing for

the parties.

2. This appeal is filed against the award of the Tribunal

passed in MVC No. 8242/2016 dated 14.02.2018.

3. The injured - claimant filed claim application

claiming compensation of Rs.75,00,000/-, but the Tribunal

considered the entire evidence on record and granted a sum of

Rs.7,25,500/- with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. from the

date of petition till the date of depositing the amount.

Aggrieved by the said order, the insurance company has filed

this appeal disputing the quantum.

4. Learned counsel for appellant mainly contended

that the Tribunal erred in taking the income of the petitioner at

Rs.8,000/- without any basis. Interest is to be granted at the

rate of 6%, but, the Tribunal has granted interest at the rate of

8%. Therefore, he requested for modification of the order.

5. Petitioner was aged about 62 years and was doing

agriculture and earning Rs.40,000/- per month. The Tribunal

observed that the petitioner had not produced any documents

NC: 2025:KHC:38499

HC-KAR

to prove his income. Petitioner had filed his land documents

under Ex.P.23, but, he had not filed any documents to prove

his income. The Tribunal has taken the notional income of the

petitioner at Rs.8,000/-, but he met with an accident on

29.12.2015 and as per the guidelines of Karnataka State Legal

Service Authority his notional income is to be taken as

Rs.9,000/-.

6. Petitioner examined P.W.2 who assessed motor

system disability of 25%, epilepsy and fits 25% and global

neurological disability of 59%, but, the Tribunal considering all

the aspects has taken the whole body disability at 29%. The

Insurance Company mainly disputes the income assessed by

P.W.2 as excessive. Considering the evidence on record this

Court finds it reasonable to confirm the same. Hence,

9000 X 12 X 7 X 29% = 219240 (loss of future income)

9000 X 3 = 27000 (income during the laid up period)

7. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal under

other heads needs no interference.

8. In view of the above, the total compensation

payable is :

NC: 2025:KHC:38499

HC-KAR

a) Pain and suffering - Rs. 75,000.00

b) Medical expenses - Rs.3,96,582.00

c) Loss of income during laid

up period - Rs. 27,000.00

d) Loss of future income - Rs.2,19,240.00

e) Loss of future amenities

and happiness - Rs. 15,000.00

f) Attendant, conveyance, food

and nourishment charges - Rs. 20,000.00

-----------------

TOTAL - Rs.7,52,822.00

9. Accordingly, appeal is allowed in part and the total

compensation is enhanced to Rs.7,52,822/- with interest at the

rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. The

Insurance Company is directed to deposit the total

compensation amount with interest at the rate of 6% p.a.

within 1 month from today. On such deposit, respondent No. 1

is permitted to withdraw the entire amount along with the

interest accrued on it.

Sd/-

(P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE LRS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter