Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Basavaraj Vandelappa Uppar vs Vithal Krishna Kaloji
2025 Latest Caselaw 10009 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10009 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Basavaraj Vandelappa Uppar vs Vithal Krishna Kaloji on 10 November, 2025

                                                        -1-
                                                                     NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306
                                                               MFA No. 101135 of 2016


                              HC-KAR




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                            DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025
                                                 BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
                       MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101135 OF 2016 (MV-I)
                             BETWEEN:
                             BASAVARAJ DANDELAPPA UPPAR,
                             AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE NOW NIL,
                             R/O: PRESENTLY AT ITC COLONY,
                             MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
                                                                              ...APPELLANT
                             (BY SRI. YASH, ADVOCATE FOR
                                 SRI. VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE)

                             AND:
                             1.   VITHAL KRISHNA KALOJI,
                                  AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                                  R/O: H.NO.1229, MARUTI NAGAR,
                                  DANDELI, TAL; HALIYAL [UTTAR KANNADA]

                             2.   THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
                                  NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
GIRIJA A.
BYAHATTI                          I FLOOR, RAMDEV GALLI, BELAGAVI.
                                                                           ...RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
                             (BY SRI. VISHWANATH V. BADIGER, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
DHARWAD
                                 M/S ANUSHA, ADVOCATE FOR
                                 SRI. S.K. KAYAKMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

                                  THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
                             VEHICLES ACT PRAYING TO THAT THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
                             DATED 28.10.2015 AND SAME CAME CORRECTED ON
                             27/02/2016 IN MVC.NO.2790/2012 PASSED BY I ADDITIONAL
                             DISTRICT JUDGE AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT
                             CLAIMS   TRIBUNAL-II,  BELAGAVI   IN  AWARDING    THE
                             COMPENSATION OF RS.4,55,800/- AND INTEREST AT RATE OF
                             6% FROM THE DATE OF PETITION AND MAY BE KINDLY
                                 -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306
                                       MFA No. 101135 of 2016


 HC-KAR




MODIFIED BY ENHANCING AS PRAYED FOR WITH                     18%
INTEREST, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:       THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA



                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)

Sri Yash who represented Sri Vitthal S. Teli, learned

counsel on record for the appellant was heard on 06.11.2025.

Heard Ms. Anusha, who appears through Video Conference

and represents Sri S.K.Kayakamath learned counsel for

respondent No.2. No representation for respondent No.1 on

call.

2. Challenge in this appeal is the award that is passed

by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Belagavi in MVC

2790 of 2012 dated 28.10.2015. This is a claimant's appeal.

3. The appellant projecting that he sustained grievous

injuries in the road traffic accident that occurred in the year

2012 filed a petition claiming compensation of Rs.15,00,000/-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306

HC-KAR

in total. The tribunal through the impugned award granted a

sum of Rs.4,55,800/- as compensation. With a version that he

is entitled to a higher sum the present appeal is filed.

4. The submission that was made by the learned

counsel for the appellant is that the tribunal erred in assessing

the income of the appellant as on the date of accident and

thereby awarded meager sum as compensation both under

the heads 'loss of future earnings' and 'loss of income during

laid up period'. Learned counsel further submitted that the

tribunal failed to award any compensation for 'loss of

amenities in life'. Learned counsel also stated that the

compensation granted under all heads is on lower side.

5. The submission that is made by learned counsel for

respondent No.2 is that the tribunal took the notional income

of the appellant as Rs.6,000/- per month, but for the relevant

period the Courts are taking the notional income as Rs.6,500/-

per month and therefore the same may be considered.

Learned counsel also states that there are no other grounds to

interfere with the findings given by the tribunal.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306

HC-KAR

6. It is not in dispute that the appellant sustained four

grievous injuries due to the road traffic accident which

includes fracture to left femur. The evidence of PW2 is that the

appellant is suffering with permanent disability in relation to

left lower limb to an extent of 60%. The tribunal took the

disability in respect of whole body as 20% which needs no

interference. Also the tribunal has rightly assessed the

multiplier to be applied that is '18'. Thus having taken the

notional income as Rs.6,500/- per month, the multiplier to be

applied as '18' and the disability in respect of whole body as

20%, the compensation which the appellant is entitled to

receive towards 'loss of future earnings' is Rs.2,80,800/-

(Rs.6,500x12x18x20%).

7. Having considered the nature of injuries sustained

that is four grievous injuries, this Court is of the view that the

appellant could have taken bed rest at least for a period of 5

months. Thus 'loss of earnings during laid up period' comes to

Rs.32,500/- (Rs.6,500x5). Also this Court is of the view that

the appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards 'loss

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306

HC-KAR

of amenities in life'. Further as rightly pleaded by learned

counsel for the appellant the compensation that is granted by

the tribunal under all other head requires marginal

enhancement. Having considered the totality of evidence

produced, this Court is of the view that the appellant is

entitled to compensation under following heads:

                  Heads                              Amount in Rs.
   Towards pain and suffering                             40,000.00
   Towards food, extra-nourishment,                       15,000.00
   attendant and conveyance charges
   Medical expenses                                       1,33,595.00
   Loss of future earnings                                2,80,800.00
   Loss of income during laid up                            32,500.00
   period
   Loss of amenities in life                                15,000.00
   Future medical expenses                                  15,000.00
                   Total                                  5,31,895.00

      8.      Thus   the   appellant     is    entitled   to   a   sum   of

Rs.5,31,895/- as compensation. Therefore the appeal is

disposed of with the following:

ORDER

(i) The appeal is allowed in part.

(ii) The compensation that is granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Belagavi through

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15306

HC-KAR

orders in MVC 2790 of 2012 dated 28.10.2015 is enhanced from Rs.4,55,800/- to Rs.5,31,895/-.

(iii) The enhanced sum shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit.

(iv) Respondent No.2 is directed to deposit the enhanced sum within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment.

(v) On such deposit, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the entire amount.

Sd/-

(CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

EM CT-MCK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter