Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5983 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2769
WP No. 201286 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 201286 OF 2025 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S BIRADAR AGRO CENTRE,
BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
SRI SUBHAS SIDDANNA BIRADAR,
01, MAHAVEER CIRCLE, INDI,
DIST. VIJAYAPURA -586209.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI SUBHASH MALLAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE
Digitally signed TAX (APPEALS), BELAGAVI, DIVISION,
by LUCYGRACE BELAGAVI-560 027.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 2. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
KARNATAKA
(AUDIT)-1, AFZALPUR TAKKE,
VIJAYAPURA-586 101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER
APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
23.04.2025 IN FILE BEARING GST:AP:11/2025-26/B-71 DATED
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2769
WP No. 201286 of 2025
HC-KAR
23.04.2025 ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, VIDE
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ)
A statutory appeal filed by the petitioner before the
respondent No.1 challenging an order of assessment was
dismissed on the ground that the same was belated. The
petitioner is therefore, before this Court challenging the
said order.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the issue whether the respondent No.1 is entitled to
condone the delay or not is no longer res integra in view of
the authoritative pronouncement of this Court in
W.P.No.200569/2025, W.P.No.200898/2025 and
W.P.No.200975/2025. Therefore, he contends that the
impugned order be set aside and the appeal before the
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2769
HC-KAR
respondent No.1 be restored and a direction to be made to
respondent No.1 to dispose of the appeal in accordance
with law.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate does
not dispute the fact that the issue is squarely covered by
the judgments of this Court mentioned above.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order
dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner deserves to be
set aside. Consequently, the following order is passed:
ORDER
(i) The Writ Petition is allowed.
(ii) The impugned order passed by the
respondent No.1 bearing No.GST:AP:11/
2025-26/B-71 dated 23.04.2025 is
quashed.
(iii) The respondent No.1 is directed to re-
consider the appeal after considering the
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2769
HC-KAR
application for condonation of delay in
accordance with law.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is
permitted to file memo of appearance within ten days.
Sd/-
(R.NATARAJ) JUDGE
SWK
CT:PK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!