Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5637 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:13142-DB
CCC No. 580 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
CCC NO. 580 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI KALYAN B BADAMI
S/O. BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 28,
SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD,
UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH,
BANGALORE - 560 061.
NOW AT #270, RENUKA NILAYA,
3RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK,
JNANABHARATHI LAYOUT
VOLAGEREHALLI, DUBASIPALYA,
R.V.C.E POST, BENGALURU - 560 059.
...COMPLAINANT
Digitally (BY SRI B.C. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE)
signed by
CHAITHRA AND:
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka 1. SRI AJAY V., K. A. S.,
THE ZONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA ZONE,
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
IDEAL HOME, 18TH CROSS,
BENGALURU - 560 098.
...ACCUSED
(BY SRI PRASHANTH S.H., ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE
HON'BLE COURT MAY INITIATE PROCEEDING AGAINST ACCUSED
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:13142-DB
CCC No. 580 of 2024
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT
AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSON FOR DELIBERATELY
DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2024 PASSED BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.2027/2024 (LB-BMP) ANNEXURE - A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The direction in the order of learned Single Judge dated
15.02.2024 was for deciding the application of the petitioner-
complainant which was regarding the request for change of Khata.
The present contempt petition is filed in respect of alleged non-
compliance of the said order.
2. When the contempt petition came up for consideration today,
learned advocate Mr. S.H. Prashanth for the respondent filed the
affidavit along with which, the endorsement dated 10.10.2024 has
been produced, whereby the request of the complainant for
bifurcation of Khata has not been acceded to.
NC: 2025:KHC:13142-DB
3. The said order of the Assistant Revenue Officer, Bruhat
Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike is served on the counsel for the
complainant along with the compliance affidavit.
4. The factum of passing of the endorsement is not disputable
by the complainant.
5. In the aforesaid view, the contempt petition does not survive.
It is accordingly disposed of as not surviving.
At the request of learned advocate B.C. Venkatesh for the
complainant made at this stage, it is observed that the complainant
is at liberty to challenge the endorsement in question by instituting
appropriate independent proceedings in accordance with law in
respect of which, however, this court does not express any opinion
on merits.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
CR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!