Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhuvaneshwar @ Kutti vs State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 5636 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5636 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Bhuvaneshwar @ Kutti vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2025

Author: Mohammad Nawaz
Bench: Mohammad Nawaz
                                                 -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC:12997
                                                        CRL.P No. 12320 of 2023




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                               BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
                               CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12320 OF 2023
                      BETWEEN:

                            BHUVANESHWAR @ KUTTI,
                            S/O. CHATHU KUTTI,
                            AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
                            R/AT 1ST CROSS, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE,
                            N.G.R. LAYOUT, RUPENA AGRAHARA,
                            BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 068.
                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAO LOKANDE N, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY J. P. NAGAR P.S.,
                            BENGALURU - 560 078.
Digitally signed by         (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED
LAKSHMI T                   STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location: High              HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Court of Karnataka
                            BANGALORE - 01)

                      2.    M. S. RAMESH RAO
                            S/O. NOT KNOWN,
                            AGE MAJOR,
                            O/AT POLICE INSPECTOR,
                            C.C.B., N.T. PETE,
                            BENGALURU - 560 002.
                            (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED
                              -2-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC:12997
                                     CRL.P No. 12320 of 2023




     STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
     HIGH COURT BUILDING,
     BANGALORE - 01)
                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1)

      THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST HIM
IN   C.C.NO.31915/2018     WHICH    IS    ARISING      OUT    OF
CR.NO.707/2015 OF J.P. NAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE
WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE XXX ADDITIONAL
CHIEF   METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE          AT    BENGALURU     FOR
OFFENCE P/U/S 399, 402 AND 120B OF IPC.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ


                       ORAL ORDER

Petitioner is seeking to quash the entire proceedings

initiated against him in C.C. No.31915/2018 pending before the

XXX Additional Chief Metropolitain Magistrate at Bengaluru,

arising out of Crime No.707/2015 of J.P.Nagar Police Station,

registered for offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 R/w

Section 120B of IPC.

NC: 2025:KHC:12997

2. The aforementioned FIR came to be registered against

accused Nos.1 to 6 on a complaint lodged by the Police

Inspector, C.C.B, N.T. Pete, Bengaluru City, alleging that the

accused were making preparation to commit dacoity, armed

with deadly weapons, near Madduramma Temple, Puttenahalli

Lake, Jaraganahalli, Bengaluru City.

3. As per complaint averments, five accused had

assembled at the spot. The police apprehended three of them,

whereas, two others escaped. Petitioner is arraigned as accused

No.6 in the FIR as well as charge sheet on an allegation that,

being in prison, he too conspired to commit the offence.

4. Admittedly, the petitioner was not present at the spot

even according to the prosecution. Learned counsel for

petitioner has also not disputed that the petitioner was in

prison at the time of alleged incident. However, it is his

contention that there is no material against the petitioner to

charge sheet him, on the other hand only on the basis of

confession statement of the co-accused, he has been arraigned

as an accused in this case.

NC: 2025:KHC:12997

5. Having perused the material on record, this Court finds

that there is no sufficient materials against the petitioner

except the voluntary statement of the co-accused. Be that as it

may, it is not in dispute that accused Nos.1 and 3 who faced

Trial in S.C. No.73/2019 and 1113/2019 are acquitted by the

Sessions Court, vide Judgment dated 14.03.2025.

6. Learned Sessions Judge has held that the prosecution

has failed to prove that the accused committed the alleged

offence and thereby extended benefit of doubt to the said

accused.

7. In the above facts and circumstances, proceedings

pending against the petitioner/accused No.6 deserves to be

quashed, as continuation of proceedings will be a futile exercise

and no purpose will be served.

Accordingly, the following:-

ORDER

i. Petition is allowed.

ii. The entire proceeding pending against the

petitioner in C.C No.31915/2018 on the file of the

NC: 2025:KHC:12997

Court of XXX Additional Chief Metropolitan

Magistrate at Bengaluru (Crime No.707/2015 of

J.P.Nagar Police station) is quashed.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE

VS

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter