Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nagesh @ Nagaraj vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 5445 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5445 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Nagesh @ Nagaraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 March, 2025

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855
                                                     CRL.A No. 200078 of 2025




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH


                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200078 OF 2025 (U/S 14-A(2))


                   BETWEEN:

                   NAGESH @ NAGARAJ
                   S/O VIJAYAKUMAR MOKALAJI,
                   AGE:23 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                   R/O. AKKAMAHADEVI NAGAR, INDI,
                   DIST.VIJAYAPURA-586209.
                                                                 ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI R. S. LAGALI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed        THROUGH THE SHO / PSI, INDI PS,
by RENUKA               REP. BY THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location:
HIGH COURT              HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
OF                      KALABURAGI-585 103.
KARNATAKA
                   2.   DHAMU S/O GANU JADHAV,
                        AGE:43 YEARS, OCC: HOTEL EMPLOYEE,
                        R/O. INGALAGI LT NO.1, TQ.INDI,
                        DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586 209.

                                                              ...RESPONDENTS

                   (BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1;
                    R2 SERVED)
                             -2-
                                       NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855
                                  CRL.A No. 200078 of 2025




     THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/SEC. 14-A(2) OF SC/ST (PA) ACT,
PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DT. 28-01-2025 PASSED IN CRL.MISC NO.26/2025 BY THE
HON'BLE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
SPECIAL JUDGE VIJAYAPURA AND THEREBY ORDER THE
RELEASE OF THE APPELLANT N BAIL IN SPECIAL CASE (SC/ST)
NO. 74/2024 (ARISING OUT OF INDI PS CRIME NO. 56/2024)
FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 61(2), 49, 126(2),
103(1)(2), 351(2), 352, 238 R/W S. 190 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA
SANHITA, 2023 AND SEC. 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (PREVENTION OF
ATROCITIES) ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE II
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE
VIJAYAPURA.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH


                    ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH)

This appeal is filed by the appellant/accused No.6

being aggrieved by the order dated 28.01.2025 passed in

Crl.Misc.No.26/2025 by the learned II Additional District

and Sessions and Special Judge, Vijayapur.

Brief facts of the case are:

2. It is the case of the prosecution that a written

complaint came to be registered by respondent No.2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855

stating that on 29.11.2023, quarrel had taken place

between deceased Sanket, Satish and Dhanaraj. The

deceased Sanket had assaulted both Satish and Dhanaraj

with knife and caused injuries to them. The matter was

settled between them and the complainant had paid

compensation of Rs.1,80,000/- to the injured persons.

Thereafter, due to the said incident, the accused Nos.1 to

3 were waiting for an opportunity to take revenge against

the old quarrel that had taken place between the deceased

and themselves.

3. It is stated that on 14.09.2024, accused Nos.1

to 3 and another have assaulted the deceased Sanket

when he was proceeding on his motorcycle along with

CW.16. In the said incident, Sanket had sustained injuries

and succumbed to the said injures. A complaint came to

be registered by the father of the deceased against

accused Nos.1 to 3 and another. The jurisdictional police

have registered a case against accused Nos.1 to 3 and

another in Crime No.56/2024 for the offences under

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855

Sections 61(2), 49, 126(2), 103(1)(2), 351(2), 352, 238

read with Section 190 of BNS, 2023 and under Section

3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

4. During the investigation, the name of this

appellant was inserted in the charge sheet on the basis of

the voluntary statement of accused No.1.

5. Heard learned counsel Sri R.S.Lagali for the

appellant and the learned High Court Government Pleader

Sri Jamadar Shahabuddin for the respondent No.1. The

respondent No.2 is served and unrepresented.

6. It is the submission of learned counsel for the

appellant is that the appellant is innocent of the alleged

offences and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Though there are some allegations against the appellant

that he had assisted accused Nos.1 to 5 to eliminate the

deceased, there is no proof in that regard.

7. It is further submitted that based on the

voluntary statement of accused No.1, a case has been

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855

registered against accused No.1, however, it cannot be

sustained as it is contrary to the settled principle of law.

Therefore, the appellant may be enlarged on bail by

imposing suitable conditions.

8. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader though has opposed the submission of learned

counsel for the appellant, he has not made out a case to

deny the bail to the appellant. Therefore, the submission

of learned High Court Government Pleader cannot be

sustained.

9. Having heard the learned counsel for respective

parties and on perusal of the averments of the complaint

and the charge sheet, it appears from the records that the

appellant has been arrayed as accused No.6 in the charge

sheet, however, it has been come on record on the basis

of the voluntary statement of accused No.1. There is no

evidence to show that he assisted the others to eliminate

the deceased. Hence, it is appropriate to grant him bail

without adverting to the merits of the case.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855

10. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

The appeal is allowed.

The impugned order passed by the learned II

Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge,

Vijayapur in Crl.Misc.No.26/2025 dated 28.01.2025 is set

aside.

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in

Crime No.56/2024 of Indi Police Station, Vijayapur,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections

61(2), 49, 126(2), 103(1)(2), 351(2), 352, 238 read with

Section 190 of BNS, 2023 and under Section 3(2)(v) of

SC/ST (POA) Act, subject to the following conditions:

a) The appellant shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

b) The appellant shall not threaten the prosecution witnesses.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1855

c) The appellant shall not hamper the Court proceedings.

d) The appellant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court till disposal of the case.

e) The appellant shall not involve in any other criminal cases or such similar cases in future till disposal of the present case.

Sd/-

(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

SRT

CT:PK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter