Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhimappa And Ors vs Bhimraya And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 856 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 856 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Bhimappa And Ors vs Bhimraya And Anr on 9 July, 2025

Author: Ravi V Hosmani
Bench: Ravi V Hosmani
                                                -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC-K:3768
                                                        MFA No. 200060 of 2024


                    HC-KAR




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                       KALABURAGI BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                              BEFORE

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 200060 OF 2024 (MV-D)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   BHIMAPPA S/O DUNDAPPA JANOJI,
                        AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: NIL.,
                        R/O: SANGAPUR,
                        TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.

                   2.   CHANDRAWWA W/O BHIMAPPA JANOJI,
                        AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: NIL.,
                        R/O: SANGAPUR,
                        TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.

                   3.   MAHANANDA
                        W/O HANAMANTH JANOJI,
                        AGE: 34 YEARS,
                        OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
Digitally signed        R/O: SANGAPUR,
by RAMESH
MATHAPATI               TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF           4.   MALLAPPA S/O HANMANTH JANOJI,
KARNATAKA
                        AGE: 16 YEARS, MINOR,
                        UNDER GUARDIANSHIP BY
                        PETITIONER NO.3 MAHANANDA,
                        R/O: SANGAPUR,
                        TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.

                   5.   RENUKA D/O HANMANTH JANOJI,
                        AGE: 14 YEARS, MINOR,
                        UNDER GUARDIANSHIP BY
                        PETITIONER NO.3 MAHANANDA,
                        R/O: SANGAPUR,
                        TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
                              -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-K:3768
                                      MFA No. 200060 of 2024


 HC-KAR




6.   MAHANTESH S/O HANMANTH JANOJI,
     AGE: 12 YEARS, MINOR,
     UNDER GUARDIANSHIP BY
     PETITIONER NO.3 MAHANANDA,
     R/O: SANGAPUR,
     TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.

7.   SUSHMITA D/O HANMANTH JANOJI,
     AGE: 12 YEARS, MINOR,
     UNDER GUARDIANSHIP BY
     PETITIONER NO.3 MAHANANDA,
     R/O: SANGAPUR,
     TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
                                                  ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI VIRANAGOUDA M.BIRADAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)

AND:

1.   BHIMARAYA
     S/O SIDRAMAPPA NANDARAGI,
     AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O: RAMANAHALLI,
     POST: TEGGIHALLI, TQ: SINDAGI,
     DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 217.

2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER,
     ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
     1ST FLOOR, BIDRI COMPLEX,
     S.S. FRONT ROAD, VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
                                                ...RESPONDENTS

      THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, PAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND    M.A.C.T.,-V,  VIJAYAPURA,  DATED    04.05.2022,  IN
M.V.C.NO.832/2017 BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AS
PRAYED FOR.

     THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT
WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
                               -3-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-K:3768
                                      MFA No. 200060 of 2024


HC-KAR




                        ORAL JUDGMENT

Though matter was listed for non-compliance of office

objections for sixth time, none appears. It was passed over and

called again.

There is no representation. This would indicate that

appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is

dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

NB

Ct: Vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter