Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 525 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
CRL.P No. 102174 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102174 OF 2025
(439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)
BETWEEN:
RAMESH S/O. GALAPPA HOSAMANI,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
R/O. SAMBAPUR ROAD, SIDARTH NAGAR, GADAG,
NOW RESIDING AT: SHIVASHANKAR NAGAR,
OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI-580024.
...PETITIONER
(BY MISS. RESHMA MADIWALAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY OLD HUBBALLI POLICE STATION,
DHARWAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT: DHARWAD-580011.
Digitally
signed by
RAKESH S
2. SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O. ANIL HOSAMANI,
HARIHAR AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
Location:
High Court R/O. SAMBHAPUR ROAD,
of Karnataka, SIDDARTH NAGAR, GADAG-582101.
Dharwad
Bench ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.439 OF CR.P.C.
(U/S.483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/SOLE
ACCUSED ON BAIL IN THE CRIME NO.249/2024 FOR OFFENCES U/S.
351(2), 351(3), 65(1) OF BNS AND SECTION 4 AND 6 OF THE
POCSO ACT, 2012, ON THE FILE OF THE OLD HUBBALLI POLICE
STATION, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS AND SPL. JUDGE, DHARWAD, IN SPL.SC.
NO.15/2025, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
CRL.P No. 102174 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Heard Smt.Reshma Madiwalar, learned counsel for
the petitioner-accused and Smt.Kirtilata Patil, learned High
Court Government Pleader for respondent-State.
2. The petitioner has filed this petition under
Section 483 of BNSS-2023 (439 of Cr.P.C.) to enlarge him
on bail in Crime No.249/2024 (Spl.C.No.15/2025 pending
on the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad
and Special Court for the offences under the POCSO Act
and SC & ST (POA)Act.) of Old Hubballi Police Station,
registered for the offences punishable under Sections
351(2), 351(3), 65(1) of BNS-2023 and Section 4 and 6 of
the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act-2012.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:
The victim girl, aged about 14 years is none other
than the daughter of the first informant and she is a
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
resident of Gadag. The Accused is none other than the
paternal uncle (brother of the father of the victim) of the
victim. On 24.09.2024, the victim had been to the house
of her grandmother as her grandmother is unwell. At that
time, accused asked her to stay in his house as her grand-
mother's house is too small. At that time, the accused
under intoxication committed aggravated and penetrative
sexual assault on the victim. Thus, she became pregnant.
When the victim girl was tested by the medical officer, she
was found to be pregnant. Therefore, the first informant
lodged complaint, which leads registration of FIR and
investigation. During the course of investigation, the
petitioner was arrested by the respondent-Police and in
turn, he was remanded to the judicial custody. Now, the
investigating officer, after investigating the matter, has
filed the charge sheet before the Special Court.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner
vehemently contended that the petitioner is innocent. He
has not committed any offence as alleged by the
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in the case
and there is no material against the petitioner. In this
case, DNA report is negative and as per the RFSL report,
no seminal stains are detected. Now, the investigation is
completed, and the Investigating Officer has already filed
a charge sheet against the accused and there is no
necessity of the petitioner to continue in judicial custody
and the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions
imposed by this Court. Hence, prays to allow the petition.
5. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that
there is prima facie material against the petitioner. The
statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of
Cr.P.C., she has categorically stated against the accused
and the manner of aggravated and penetrative sexual
assault made on her. The medical report clearly indicates
that the hymen is ruptured. The victim is minor aged 14
years and the DNA report is not a conclusive proof. If the
accused is released on bail, he would tamper the
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
prosecution witnesses and hamper the investigation and
hence prays to dismiss the bail petition.
6. On perusal of the material available on record,
it reveals that the victim was a minor at the time of
commission of the offence. As per the statement of victim
recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., she has stated that
the accused under intoxicated conditions, committed
aggravated and penetrative sexual assault on her, when
she visited the house of the accused, knowing fully well
that, the victim was a minor girl. On perusal of the medical
record, it reveals that the hymen of the victim girl is
ruptured.
7. Now the petitioner is relying on the DNA report
issued by the Scientific Officer, RFSL, Hubballi. According
to which, the sample blood furnished is excluded from the
blood of the biological father of the fetus. However, the
DNA report does not falsify the entire case of prosecution
as rightly submitted by the learned HCGP. In the instant
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
case, it is alleged that the victim girl is aged about 14
years and the medical officer has conducted PCR test.
8. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a
reported judgment in Crl.P.No.6789/2022 in paragraph
No.12 and in 2022 SCC OnLine KAR 1542 at paragraph-
14, clearly held that 'the DNA report is not a conclusive
proof'. The version of the victim as stated in the first
information and also in her statement recorded under
Section 164 of Cr.P.C., cannot be ignored in toto.
However, now the material on record i.e. DNA report
discloses that the petitioner is not the biological father of
the fetus. To that extent, the contentions taken by the
accused can be accepted at this stage. The petitioner is in
judicial custody since 7 months i.e. from the date of
arrest. The trial in the matter may take a considerable
amount of time. The petitioner is a permanent resident of
the address mentioned in the cause title of the petition
and he is ready and willing to abide by the conditions
imposed by this Court. Under these circumstances, the
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
petitioner may be enlarged on bail with stringent
conditions.
9. Accordingly I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER The criminal petition is allowed.
The petitioner-accused is ordered to be enlarged on
bail in Crime No.249/2024 (Spl.C.No.15/2025 pending on
the file of II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad
and Special Court for the offences under the POCSO Act
and SC & ST (POA)Act.) of Old Hubballi Police Station, on
the following conditions.
(i) The petitioner-accused shall execute a
personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-
with two sureties for the like sum to the
satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall not threaten or tamper
the prosecution witnesses either directly or
indirectly.
NC: 2025:KHC-D:8247
HC-KAR
(iii) The petitioner shall attend the
jurisdictional Court regularly and as and
when required.
(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in the
similar offences.
Violation of any one of the conditions would entitle the prosecution to seek for cancellation of the bail.
NOTE: The observations made in the petition is only for disposal of the petition.
Sd/-
(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
HMB CT-AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!