Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Shashidhar M N vs The Partner
2025 Latest Caselaw 1638 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1638 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Shashidhar M N vs The Partner on 24 July, 2025

                                                    -1-
                                                                  NC: 2025:KHC:28447
                                                               MFA No. 845 of 2017


                       HC-KAR




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                                 BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 845 OF 2017 (MV-I)
                      BETWEEN:

                      SRI SHASHIDHAR MN
                      S/O NANJUNDAIAH,
                      AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
                      R/AT NO.5, 12TH BLOCK,
                      POLICE QUARTERS, HEBBAL,
                      BANGALORE-24
                      PERMANENT RESIDENT OF:
                      MATHIHALLI A POST,
                      TIPTUR TALUK,
                      TUMKUR DISTRICT.
                                                                          APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. SHRIPAD V SHASTRI .,ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      1.    THE PARTNER
                            M/S. CI REDY MIX,
BHARATHI
HM                          SY.NO.29 & 33, D/KAIB,
                            BOMMASANDRA INDL. AREA,
Digitally signed by
BHARATHI H M                JIGANI, BANGALORE-99.
Location:
HIGHCOURT OF
KARNATAKA
                            (R.C.OWNER OF LGV BEARIANG
DHARWAD BENCH
DHARWAD                     REG.NO.KA.50.9281).
                      2.    HDFC ERGO GENERAL
                            INSURANCE CO LTD
                            NO.14, H.M.GENEVA HOUSE,
                            CUNNINGHAM ROAD
                            BANGALORE-52.
                            (I.P.NO.231520056586 7001 00 VALID FROM 16.8.2014
                            TO 15.8.2015).
                                                                       RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. D VIJAYAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
                        NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)
                                              -2-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:28447
                                                         MFA No. 845 of 2017


    HC-KAR



     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04/05/2016 PASSED IN MVC
NO.785/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XXI ADDL. SCJ & XIX ACMM
MEMBER - MACT, BANGALORE (SCCH-23), PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION AND ETC,.
     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA


                                   ORAL JUDGMENT

The present appeal is filed by the claimant under Section

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19881 challenging the

judgment and award dated 04.05.2016 passed in

MVC.No.785/2015 by the XXI Additional Small Causes Judge

and XIX ACMM, Bangalore (SCCH-23)2 seeking for

enhancement of compensation.

2. The Tribunal vide its judgment and award dated

04.05.2016 has partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a

total compensation of `40,000/- together with interest at 6%

per annum. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed seeking

for enhancement of compensation.

Hereinafter referred as to 'Act'

Hereinafter referred as to 'Tribunal'

NC: 2025:KHC:28447

HC-KAR

3. The findings of the Tribunal on negligence and

liability are not under challenge and have attained finality.

Hence, the only aspect that is required to be considered in the

present appeal is with regard to the adequacy of the quantum

of compensation awarded.

4. Heard submissions of learned counsel Sri Shripad V

Shastri appearing for the appellant - claimant and learned

counsel Sri D Vijayakumar appearing for respondent No.2 -

insurer.

5. It is forthcoming that the claimant was aged 27

years as on date of the accident i.e., as on 16.11.2014. He was

stated to be working as a railway police constable earning a

sum of `19,825/- per month.

6. It is evident from the wound certificate (Ex.P6), the

discharge summary (Ex.P12) and the testimony of doctor

(PW.2) that the claimant has sustained crushed degloving

injury with exposure of right knee as well as injuries to right

tibia and right patella. The claimant was treated as an inpatient

for a total period of 11 days from 16.11.2014 to 26.11.2014.

The doctor (PW.2) has deposed that the whole body disability

NC: 2025:KHC:28447

HC-KAR

of the claimant as 17%. PW.2 has further deposed that the

claimant has massive skin grafts (disfiguration) and flaps over

his right knee and right leg which is numb and itches a lot. That

the claimant develops oozing and huge swelling from his skin

flap wound after activity and he is unable to do physical

training, parade and unable to run. However, it is pertinent to

note that the claimant has continued in his employment with

the railway police.

7. The Tribunal has noticed that while the claimant

claimed medical expenses of `31,568/-, PW.1 in his cross-

examination has stated that he has received reimbursement of

medical expenses. However, it was stated that the out patient

bills have not been reimbursed. Since there was no material

placed on record regarding the same, the Tribunal has not

awarded any compensation towards the same. However, it is

pertinent to note here that the claimant has produced the out

patient medical bills which have been cumulatively marked as

Ex.P15 which is for a total sum of `31,568/-. Hence, it is just

and proper to award medical expenses in a sum of `32,000/-.

NC: 2025:KHC:28447

HC-KAR

8. Having regard to the nature of injuries sustained, it

is just and proper that the compensation towards pain and

suffering be re-assessed as `50,000/- as against `30,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal.

9. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal

towards food, nourishment and conveyance charges of

`10,000/- is just and proper.

10. Although, the claimant is not entitled to

compensation towards loss of future earning capacity/disability,

having regard to the testimony of PW.2 and extent of disability,

as assessed by PW.2, it is just and proper that loss of amenities

be awarded in a sum of `40,000/-.

11. In view of the aforementioned, the compensation

re-assessed is as follows:

Sl.No Compensation Head Amount Amount awarded Awarded by the by this Court (`) Tribunal (`) 1 Pain and suffering 30000.00 50000.00 2 Food, conveyance and 10000.00 10000.00 nourishment 3 Loss of amenities 00.00.00 40000.00 4 Medical expenses 00.00 32000.00 Total 40000.00 132000.00

NC: 2025:KHC:28447

HC-KAR

12. Accordingly, the Claimant is entitled to an enhanced

compensation of (`1,32,000/- - `40,000/-)= `92,000/-.

13. In view of the aforementioned, the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part;

ii) The judgment and award dated 04.05.2016 passed in MVC.No.785/2015 by the XXI Additional Small Causes Judge and XIX ACMM, Bangalore (SCCH-

23), is hereby modified to the extent stated herein.

In all other respects, the judgment and award of the Tribunal remains unaltered;

iii) The appellant/claimant is entitled to an enhanced compensation of `92,000/- together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till its realization, in addition to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal;

iv) Respondent No.2 - insurer shall deposit the said compensation together with accrued interest within a period of six weeks;

v) Upon such deposit, the entire enhanced compensation together with interest accrued thereupon be disbursed to the claimant;

NC: 2025:KHC:28447

HC-KAR

vi) The Registry to draw the modified award accordingly;

vii) Records be transmitted to the Tribunal forthwith.

No costs.

Sd/-

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

PNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter