Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Flotech Engineering vs M/S Ion Exchange (India) Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 1146 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1146 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2025

Karnataka High Court

M/S Flotech Engineering vs M/S Ion Exchange (India) Ltd on 18 July, 2025

Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
                                              -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC:26990
                                                        RFA No. 589 of 2008


                   HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                            BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                         REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 589 OF 2008 (MON)
                   BETWEEN:

                   M/S FLOTECH ENGINEERING
                   & TRADING SERVICES NO 47
                   SUNKADAKATE MAGADI ROAD
                   BANGALORE-91
                   REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
                   SRI M C SHYAMSUKA.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. AJAY SHANKAR SINGH., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    M/S ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD
                         COMPANY REGD. OFFICE AT
                         "TIECICON" HOUSE DR E MOSES ROAD
                         MAHALAKSHMI ROAD
Digitally signed         BOMBAY-400011
by NAGAVENI              REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka          2.    M/S ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD
                         PLOT NO 105 SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
                         HOUSE, TAMILNADU-635126
                         REP. BY GENERAL MANAGER.

                   3.    M/S ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD
                         NO 305 EMBASSY CHAMBERS
                         NO 5 VITTAL MALYA ROAD
                         BANGALORE-560001
                         REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. GOVINDRAJ & SRI P NEHRU ., ADVOCATES FOR R3)
                                -2-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC:26990
                                           RFA No. 589 of 2008


HC-KAR



     THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:15.12.2007 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.8468/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL
JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
RECOVERY OF MONEY.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

The appellant is before this Court, calling in question

an order of the consent court dated 15.12.2007 in

O.S.No.8468/1995.

2. During the subsistence of this petition, the parties

to the lis have settled the dispute amongst themselves by

drawing certain terms of settlement. The petition of

compromise filed under Order 23 Rule 3 r/w. Section 151

of the CPC reads as follows:

"The Appellant and the Respondent named above respectfully submit before this Hon'ble Court as follows:

1. The Appellant had filed a suit O.S.No.8468/1995 before the Hon'ble City Civil Court, Bengaluru, against the Respondents for recovery of money,

NC: 2025:KHC:26990

HC-KAR

upon contest, the Hon'ble City Civil Court, Bengaluru, by its judgment and decree dated 15.12.2007 was pleased to partly decreed the said suit, the respondents herein are jointly and severally liable to pay a sum of Rs.1,16,823/- to the appellant together with court costs and current and future interest at the rate of 12% p.a., on Rs.67,923/- from the date of the suit till its realization.

2. The appellant, against the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2007 passed in OS.No.8468/1995, filed an appeal before this Hon'ble Court in RFA.No.589/2008. When the appeal listed for final hearing before this Hon'ble Court, the respondents at the intervention of common friends amicably resolved their disputes. Accordingly, the respondents agreed to pay a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) to the appellant as full and final settlement of their claim. The appellant also agreed for the said amount.

3. As per the terms of the compromise, the respondents have paid Rs.4,50,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) to the appellant by way of D.D. No.001112, dated 16.07.2025 drawn on Bank of India, Hosur Branch, in favour of the Appellant.

The appellant acknowledged the receipt of said DD,

NC: 2025:KHC:26990

HC-KAR

towards full and final settlement from the respondents in the above case.

4. This compromise is recorded with the consent and concurrence of parties to the appeal and the appeal may please be ordered to be disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived by the parties to the appeal. Upon the terms of the compromise being fulfilled and satisfied the parties shall not agitate further before any court of law.

5. The terms and conditions of this compromise petition have been read over to the appellant and respondents in the above case in the language known to them and after understanding the contents of the compromise petition the respective parties have put their respective signatures on this compromise petition in the presence of their respective counsels on record and their counsels on record, have identified the signatures of the respective parties in the above case. Hence the appellant and respondents most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to record the compromise entered into between the appellant and respondents in the above case and to dispose of the case in terms of the compromise petition filed by them.

NC: 2025:KHC:26990

HC-KAR

6. The Appellant most respectfully submits that since the present appeal is being disposed of on the basis of a lawful compromise between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the appellant is entitled to a refund of the court fees paid on the memorandum of appeal, in accordance with Section 69-A of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The Appellant therefore humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the refund of the full court fee paid in the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity.

WHEREFORE, the appellant and respondents in the above case, jointly and severally pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose of the above case in terms of the compromise petition filed by the appellant and respondents in the above case, in the interest of justice and equity."

3. In the light of the settlement of the dispute

between the parties, I deem it appropriate to close the suit

by directing drawing up of a decree in terms of the

compromise.

NC: 2025:KHC:26990

HC-KAR

4. In the light of the settlement arrived at between

the parties, the appellant would become entitled to the

refund of court fee as obtaining under Section 69-A of the

Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, which

should be refund of the entire court fee that is deposited

by the appellant.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

CM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter