Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukrutha Kreeda Samsthe vs State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 2898 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2898 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sukrutha Kreeda Samsthe vs State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2025

Author: R Devdas
Bench: R Devdas
                                             -1-
                                                        NC: 2025:KHC:3324
                                                     WP No. 35290 of 2024




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                         BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                     WRIT PETITION NO. 35290 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
               BETWEEN:

               SUKRUTHA KREEDA SAMSTHE
               SARVAJNA ROAD,
               K.R.NAGARA (KRISHNARAJA NAGAR),
               MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 502.
               REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
               SRI. Y.R. SHIVAKUMAR
               S/O LATE Y.R. RACHAPPA
               AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
               (REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA
               SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960)
                                                             ...PETITIONER
               (BY SRI. PRITHVIRAJ SHASTRY G, ADVOCATE FOR
                   SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by AND:
DHARMALINGAM
Location: HIGH
COURT OF            1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,
KARNATAKA
                     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
                     HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                     BANGALORE - 560 001.

               2.    THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                     MYSORE DISTRICT,
                     MYSURU - 571 301.

               3.    DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                     MYSORE DISTRICT,
                     MYSURU - 571 301.
                                   -2-
                                                 NC: 2025:KHC:3324
                                             WP No. 35290 of 2024




4.   THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
     K.R. NAGARA (KRISHNARAJA NAGAR) TOWN,
     K.R. NAGAR TALUK,
     MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 602.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)

      THIS    WP   IS    FILED    UNDER   ARTICLE     226   OF   THE
CONSTITUTION       OF     INDIA     PRAYING     TO    DIRECT     THE
RESPONDENTS        NOT    TO     INTERFERE     WITH   THE   LAWFUL
OPERATION OF THE ASSOCIATION AND ITS ACTIVITIES, AND
ALLOW THE PETITIONER ASSOCIATION TO REOPEN THE
ASSOCIATION PREMISES TO RESUME ITS USUAL DAY-TO-DAY
ACTIVITIES.

      THIS    PETITION,        COMING     ON    FOR   PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS


                           ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned High Court Government Pleader.

2. The petitioner is before this Court praying for

issuance of a writ of mandamus thereby directing the

respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain

license for the recreation activities conducted by the

NC: 2025:KHC:3324

petitioner in the schedule premises either under the

Karnataka Police Act, 1963 or under the Licensing and

Controlling of the Places of Public Amusement Order,

1970.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

that, this Court in similar matters has been pleased to

dispose of the writ petition granting the relief.

4. Learned High Court Government Pleader would

submit that the writ petition could be disposed of in terms

of the order passed by this Court on 28.11.2018 while

disposing of W.P.No.50923/2018.

5. The submission of the learned High Court

Government Pleader is placed on record. If any illegal or

unlawful activities are conducted or permitted in the

petitioner's premises, it is always open for the respondents

to initiate such action as permitted under law.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner has

brought to the notice of this Court a judgment passed by

NC: 2025:KHC:3324

the Division Bench of this Court at Kalaburagi in

W.A.No.20090/2015 in the case of D.V.R. Recreation

Club Vs State of Karnataka, disposed of on 27.06.2016

and further order issued on a review petition in the same

matter on 19.10.2016. In view of the subsequent

directions issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench, the

present writ petition is disposed of with the following

directions:

a. The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game/s is/are played by the members. The CCTV footage of at least prior 15 days' period shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so.

b. The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the police, during the raid(s) and surveillance etc.

NC: 2025:KHC:3324

c. The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of S.2 (14) & 2 (15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played, except games of skills.

d. The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the police find that any of the game/s played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open for them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.

e. The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.

NC: 2025:KHC:3324

f. The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner - Club/Association.

g. It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(R DEVDAS) JUDGE

rv

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter