Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Bangaru Nayaka vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 2870 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2870 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Bangaru Nayaka vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 January, 2025

Author: M.G.S. Kamal
Bench: M.G.S. Kamal
                                            -1-
                                                         NC: 2025:KHC:3298
                                                        WP No. 646 of 2025




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                          BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                        WRIT PETITION NO.646 OF 2025 (LA-BDA)
                BETWEEN:

                1.    SRI. BANGARU NAYAKA
                      S/O SRIKANTA NAYAKA
                      AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
                      R/AT NO.656, KODIGEHALLI POST
                      MAGADI MAIN ROAD
                      BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 112

                2.    SRI. SWAMY VELU
                      S/O SRI. THAVAMANI
                      AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
                      R/AT JAI BHUVANESHWARINAGARA
                      NANDINI LAYOUT
                      BENGALURU-560 096

                3.    SMT. PAPU SARALA
Digitally
                      W/O SRI. RAJU ABAGARAM
signed by             AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
SUMA B N
Location:
                      R/AT. NO.528, JAIBHUVANESHWARINAGARA
High Court of         NANDINI LAYOUT
Karnataka
                      BENGALURU-560 096
                                                          ...PETITIONERS
                (BY SRI. H.T. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND
                      DEVELOPMENT, M.S BUILDING
                      BENGALURU-560 001
                      REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
                           -2-
                                      NC: 2025:KHC:3298
                                    WP No. 646 of 2025




2.   THE COMMISSIONER
     THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
     T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
     KUMARA PARK EAST
     BENGALURU-560 020

3.   THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
     THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
     T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
     KUMARA PARK EAST
     BENGALURU-560 020

                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA LAGALI, AGA FOR R1;
    SRI. B.S. SACHIN FOR ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT    THE    RESPONDENTS     TO    CONSIDER    THE
REPRESENTATION DTD. 07.12.2024 TO DELETE LAND BEARING
SY.NO. 53/14P, 15P AND 53/11 TOTALLY MEASURING 2 ACRES
SITUATED KODIGEHALLI VILLAGE FROM THE ACQUISITION
AND COLLECT THE BETTERMENT CHARGES TO THE
PETITIONERS RESPECTIVE SITES / HOUSE AS PER ANNX-J AND
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE PETITIONERS SITE
BEARING NO.2, MEASURING EAST TO WEST 14 FEET AND
NORTH TO SOUTH 26 FEET. EASTERN PORTION OF SITE
BEARING NO.3 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 14 FEET AND
NORTH TO SOUTH 20 FEET AND SITE BEARING NO.3 AND 4,
MEASURING EAST TO WEST 60 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH
40 FEET, FORMED IN SY.NO. 53/14P, 15P AND 53/11
SITUATED AT KODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA
HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK FROM THE ACQUISITION
AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                                   -3-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC:3298
                                                WP No. 646 of 2025




                            ORAL ORDER

Petitioners are before this Court claiming to be the

purchasers of sites forming part of land in Sy.No.53/14P, 15P

and 53/11 totally measuring 2 acres situated at Kodigehalli

Village, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, which

was originally belonging to one Sri.Narasaiah S/o

Chikkahanumaiah. That the said land was subject matter of

acquisition in terms of preliminary Notification dated

21.05.2008 and final Notification dated 18.02.2010, acquired

for the purpose of formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda

Layout. That the petitioners have been in settled possession

having constructed buildings thereon.

2. Based on the above averments following reliefs are

sought for:

"WHEREFORE, the Petitioners respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

(a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the representation dated 07.12.2024 to delete land bearing Sy.

No.53/14P, 15P and 53/11 totally measuring 2 acres situated at Kodigehalli Village from the acquisition and collect the betterment charges to

NC: 2025:KHC:3298

the Petitioner's respective sites/house as per Annexure - J.

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to delete the Petitioners site bearing No.2, measuring East to West 14 feet and North to South 26 feet. Eastern portion of

feet and North to South 20 feet and site bearing No.3 and 4, measuring East to West 60 feet and North to South 40 feet,. formed in Sy.

     No.53/14P,        15P      and     53/11       situated      at
     Kodigehalli       Village,      Yeshwanthapura           Hobli,

Bengaluru North Taluk from the acquisition.

(c) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to collect the betterment charges to the Petitioners sites formed in Sy.No.53/14P, 15P and 53/11 totally measuring 2 acres situated at Kodigehalli Village, Yeshwanthapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk.

(d) Pass any order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."

3. Counsel for the petitioners reiterating the

averments in the grounds urged in the writ petition submits

NC: 2025:KHC:3298

that the petitioner No.1 is the owner of site No.2 purchased

under Deed of Sale dated 01.03.2017, petitioner No.2 is owner

of site No.3 purchased under Deed of Sale dated 26.6.2014,

petitioner No.3 is owner of site No.4 purchased under Sale of

Deed dated 28.04.2005. He submits that the petitioners had

made representation dated 07.12.2024 for regularization of

their respective sites by collecting betterment charges in

furtherance of the provisions of Section 38(D) of the BDA Act

as per Annexure-J, which has not been considered by the

respondents authorities till date.

4. Counsel for the respondents also relies upon the

judgment of Division Bench of this Court passed in Writ Appeal

No.1783/2014 and connected matters dated 22.02.2024 and

relying upon the directions issued in the said judgment submits

that the petitioners' case would also fall within the ambit of the

directions issued there under. Hence, seeks for allowing the

present petition.

5. In response, the counsel for the respondent-BDA

submits that petitioners No.1 and 2 have purchased their sites

subsequent to the acquisition and it is only the petitioner No.3

NC: 2025:KHC:3298

who seems to have purchased the property prior to acquisition.

He submits that the benefit under Section 38(D) of the BDA Act

as well as in terms of the directions issued at Division Bench of

this Court in the aforesaid judgment passed in Writ Appeal

No.1783/2014 and connected matters is available only for the

persons who had acquired the right, title and interest prior to

the acquisition. As such petitioners No.1 and 2 are not entitled

for such consideration. However, he fairly submits that if

granted some time, the representation of the petitioners would

be considered in the light of the provisions under Section 38(D)

of the BDA Act by conducting an enquiry as contemplated there

under and appropriate order in this regard would be passed.

6. Submission is taken on record. The petition is

disposed of with the following directions:

i) The petitioners shall file applications in the prescribed

form, if any, seeking regularization in terms of the provisions of

Section 38(D) of the BDA Act within 15 days from the date of

receipt of certified copy of this order.

ii) Respondents-BDA shall conduct an enquiry after

affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioners, pass

NC: 2025:KHC:3298

appropriate orders and if the petitioners are found eligible,

regularize the same in accordance with law.

iii) The aforesaid exercise shall be done within an outer

limit of six months from the date of submission of the

applications by the petitioners.

iv) While conducting the enquiry and passing the orders

as above, the respondents-BDA shall also keep in mind the

directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ

Appeal No.1783/2014 and connected matters.

v) It is made clear that the respondents-BDA shall not

take any coercive action against the petitioners until

determination of the applications as directed hereinabove.

SD/-

(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

AP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter