Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Saraswathi Education Society vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 2561 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2561 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Saraswathi Education Society vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 January, 2025

Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj Govindaraj
                                                   -1-
                                                                 NC: 2025:KHC-D:831
                                                            WP No. 105507 of 2024




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                              DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
                                                BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 105507 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)
                      BETWEEN:
                      SRI. SARASWATHI EDUCATION SOCIETY,
                      BEARING NO.89/91-92,
                      SITUATED AT DOOR NO.36/XXV,
                      INFANTRY ROAD, CANTONMENT,
                      BALLARI-583104,
                      BY ITS SECRETARY,
                      SRI. K. UMAIR AHMED S/O. K. IQBAL AHMED,
                      AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
                      PLOT NO.24/1, MESS ROAD, CANTONMENT,
                      BALLARI CITY, BALLARI-583104.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. T.M. NADAF, ADVOCATE)
                      AND:
                      1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                           DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
                           BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                           VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEKDAR VEEDI,
                           BENGALURU-01.
GIRIJA A
BYAHATTI              2.   THE BALLARI CITY CORPORATION,
Digitally signed by
                           R/BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH
                           GADAGI CHENNAPPA CIRCLE,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
                           (ROYAL CIRLCE) BALLARI-583101.

                      3.   THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER,
                           ZONAL OFFICE-3,
                           THE BALLARI CITY CORPORATION,
                           GADAGI CHENNAPPA CIRCLE,
                           (ROYAL CIRCLE) BALLARI-583101.
                                                                    ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1;
                          MRS. RANJITA ALAGAWADI, ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. SHARANABASAVARAJ C., ADVOCATE FOR R2-R3)
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:831
                                       WP No. 105507 of 2024




      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN
THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED DEMAND
NOTICE OF PROPERTY TAX TOTALLY FIVE IN NUMBER DEMANDING
PROPERTY TAX DATED NIL AND NO. NIL TO THE TUNE OF
RS.64,10,803/- IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY BEARING NO.57/58
ASSESSMENT NO.4004, RS.48,92,530/- IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY
BEARING NO.89+54, 58 WARD NO.34, RS.28,22,267/- IN RESPECT
OF PROPERTY BEARING NO.88/89 ASSESSMENT NO.40040/409866
WARD NO.34, RS.5,39,193/- IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY BEARING
NO.89 ASSESSMENT NO.40040/49386 AND RS.57,89,479/- IN
RESPECT OF PROPERTY BEARING NO.36/13 ASSESSMENT NO.
40040/49387, WARD NO.34, (REFERRING TO THE REVIEW MEETING
OF RESPONDENT NO.2 HELD ON 22.10.2021 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
REVENUE     DIVISION)     UNDER     KARNATAKA      MUNICIPAL
                                          RD
CORPORATIONS ACT 1976, ISSUED BY THE 3       RESPONDENT, IN
RESPECT OF NANDI SCHOOL, INFANTRY ROAD, WARD NO.34,
BALLARI, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, E-1,
E-2, E-3 AND E-4 RESPECTIVELY; ISSUE SUCH OTHER WRIT OR
ORDER AS DEEMED FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

      THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


                          ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the

following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned demand notice of property tax totally five in number demanding property tax dated Nil and No. Nil to the tune of Rs.64,10,803/- in respect of property bearing no.57/58 Assessment No.4004, Rs.48,92,530/- in respect of property bearing No.89+54, 58 Ward No.34, Rs.28,22,267/- in respect of property bearing No.88/89 Assessment No.40040/409866 ward No.34,

NC: 2025:KHC-D:831

Rs.5,39,193/- in respect of property bearing No.89 Assessment No.40040/49386 and Rs.57,89,479/- in respect of property bearing No.36/13 Assessment No.40040/49387, ward No.34, (Referring to the Review meeting of Respondent No.2 held on 22.10.2021 for development of Revenue Division) under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act 1976, issued by the 3rd Respondent, in respect of Nandi School, Infantry Road, Ward No.34, Ballari, belonging to the Petitioner, vide Annexure-E, E-1, E-2, E-3 and E-4 respectively;

b. Issue such other writ or order as deemed fit in the interest of Justice and Equity.

2. The submission of Sri.T. M. Nadaf, learned counsel for

the petitioner is that, the present matter is covered

by the order of this Court dated 19.02.2024 passed in

W.P.No.101019/2024.

3. Having gone through the petition and the documents,

I am of the considered opinion that the said judgment

would equally apply to the present matter. As such, I

pass the following:

ORDER

i. Writ petition is allowed.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:831

ii. Certiorari is issued, notices at Annexures E, E1,

E2, E3 and E4 are quashed.

iii. Since it has been held that the exemption

would be applicable in totality to the petitioner's

premises, the petitioner would not be liable to

make payment of any municipal property taxes

on premises used for educational purposes.

iv. Liberty is however reserved to the corporation

to claim such property tax if the property was

used otherwise than for educational purposes,

by issuing necessary notice is that regard.

Sd/-

(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

gab CT-MCK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter