Karnataka High Court
Basanagouda S/O Veerabhadragouda ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 February, 2025
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 100137 OF 2025 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
1. BASANAGOUDA S/O. VEERABHADRAGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
(SL. NO.110)
2. MALLAPPA S/O. NAGAPPA PUJAR
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.96)
3. RAMAPPA S/O. ANANTHAPPA MASANAGI
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.125)
4. BASAVANTHAPPA S/O CHANNABASAPPA KASHAMBI
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.136)
Digitally signed by
VISHAL NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL 5. MAHAVEERAPPA S/O. ANANTHAPPA MASANAGI
Location: High
Court of Karnataka, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
Dharwad Bench,
Dharwad (SL. NO.100)
6. SANJEEVAPPA S/O. SHAMBANNA CHIKKANAJI
AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 146)
7. SHAMBANNA S/O. CHANNABASAPPA CHIKKANAJI
AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 147)
8. NINGAPPA S/O. KARADEPPA KARADER
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 133)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
9. VEERANAGOUDA S/O. MAHARUDRAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 116)
10. SMT. KARIYAVVA W/O PAKKIRAPPA WADDAR
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTUR
(SL NO. 140)
11. GUDDAPPA S/O. NAGAPPA PUJAR
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 132)
12. PAKKIRAPPA S/O. MARTHANDAPPA TALAWAR
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL NO. 120)
13. SMT PAKKIRAVVA W/O. SANNAPPA WADDAR
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 139)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: KALAGONDA,
TQ: BYADAGI,
DIST: HAVERI- 581106.
14. NAGAPPA S/O. KARIYAPPA ILIGER
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 6)
15. NAGAPPA SANNAPPA NAGANNANAVAR
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 3)
16. HANAMANTAGOUDA VEERABASANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL NO. 10)
17. SHIVALINGAPPA BASAPPA KSHAVARAD
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 17)
18. IRAPPA HANAMANTAPPA TALAWAR
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 21)
19. NAGAPPA CHANNABASAPPA NAGANNANAVAR
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
(SL. NO. 13)
20. FAKKIRAGOUDA MARIGOUDAR SANNAGOUDAR
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 25)
21. IRAVVA MARIGOUDA SANNAGOUDAR
AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 24)
22. VEERAPPA SANNAPPA NAGANNANAVAR
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 28)
23. BASAYYA SOMAYYA MATHADA
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 22)
24. CHANDRAPPA RATNAPPA LAMANI
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 40)
25. BASANAGOUDA MARIGOUDA SANNAGOUDA
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 08)
26. KUBERAGOUDA GANGANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 19)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: BADAMALLI,
TQ: BYADAGI,
DIST: HAVERI -581106.
27. MAHABALESHAPPA SHIVAPPA CHAVATI
AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 67)
28. SHANTAKUMAR NARASAPPA KADUR
AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 94)
29. NATARAJ GUDDAPPA CHALAGERI
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 76)
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
30. BHIMAPPA SOMAPPA BABAPUR
AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 86)
31. GANGAVVA NINGAPPA KAKOL
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.93)
32. SHARANAPPA GUDDAPPA YETTINMANI
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO .88)
33. MAMALEPPA SHIVAPPA SANGUR
AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 84)
34. SMT BASAVANNEVVA SANGAPPA SANGUR
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO . 85)
35. KANTESH PUTTAPPA SAALIYAVAR
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.62)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: CHINNIKATTI,
TQ: BYADAGI,
DIST: HAVERI -581106.
36. NAGANAGOUDA MALLANGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 48YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.195)
37. VEERABADRAGOUDA MALLANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO. 194)
38. RUDRAGOUDA NAGANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.205)
39. SHANKARGOUDA NAGANAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.208)
40. MAHESH BASAVARAJ PASI
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
(SL. NO.173)
41. SURESH TAMMANNA JOLIHALLI
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.161)
42. ASHOKA HONNAPPA HEREHALLI
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.183)
43. NAGAPPA PUTTAPPA BENAGERI
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.188)
44. HULIGEPPA HANUMANTAPPA BASAPUR
AGE:361 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.197)
45. GUDDAPPA KOTEPPA PASI
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.179)
46. CHIKKAPPA GUDDAPPA MULUGUND
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.181)
47. BASAVANEPPA FAKKIRAPPA DODDAMMANAVAR
AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.163)
48. MALLESHAPPA BARAMAPPA DADDIKOPPA
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.182)
49. TAMMANNA SANNAHANUMANTAPPA DASAR
AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.190)
50. SUBASH CHANNABASAPPA MANNAPPANAVAR
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
(SL. NO.175)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: KUMMURU,
TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATION
MS BUILDING, BENGALURU- 580001.
2. THE STATE CO- OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY
3RD FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK SHANTI NAGAR,
T. T. M. C., BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560002.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
3. THE ELECTION OFFICER / DEPUTY REGISTRAR
OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI -581110.
4. THE RETURNING OFFICER,
BYADGI TALUK PRATHAMIKA SAHAKAR KRUSHI
MATTU GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDDI BANK, LTD.,
AND CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
BYADGI, TQ: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106.
5. THE MANAGER/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
BYADGI TALUK PRATHAMIKA SAHAKAR KRUSHI
MATTU GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDDI BANK, LTD.,
TQ: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1, R3,
SRI G.V. BHARAMAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R4,
SRI. S. N. BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO A) TO ISSUE A
WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 5 TO INCLUDE THE NAMES OF THE
PETITIONERS IN THE FINAL ELIGIBLE BORROWER VOTER LIST AT
ANNEXURE-C DATED 24.12.24 ISSUED BY RESP-5 AND PERMIT THE
PETITIONERS TO CAST VOTE IN THE ELECTION TO THE COMMITTEE
OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT SOCIETY
SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 11/01/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED
-7-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
WP No. 100137 of 2025
BY THE 4TH RESP IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) TO
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO DECLARE THE ELECTION
RESULTS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE ELECTION PROCESS BY
ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY. C) TO ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER, DIRECTIONS AS DEEMS
FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARYT HEARING IN
'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in
unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands
covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this
Court in W.P. No.8502/2022 C/w. W.P. No.8477/2022,
disposed off on 7th June 2022. The Coordinate Bench of
this Court held as follows:
"8. In the light of these rival submissions,
the question for consideration is:
Whether these writ petitions must be
disposed of directing the Returning Officer [the
fourth respondent and sixth respondents in the
respective petitions to announce the results of the
elections held on 23.04.2022 including the votes
cast by the petitioners.
9. The provisions of Rule 13-D (2-A) of the
Rules read as hereunder:
(3) The Election Officer shall take steps for publication
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
of voters list in the following manner, namely:-
(a) for publication of draft eligible electoral list,
a list of defaulters, a list of members whose
repayment falls due, before the election
date clear fifty days;
(b) for calling objections, if any, calling upon
the defaulter members to repay the
amounts due to the co-operative societies
on or before thirty clear days prior to the
date of election;
(c) the scrutiny and verification of the voters
list after payment by defaulters etc., clear
twenty days before the ate of election.
(d) for publication of final eligible voters list
before fifteen clear days prior to the date of
election.
The underlining is by this Court.
10. These provisions do not leave any room
for doubt that an excluded member, with the
publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, must
have an opportunity by way of an individual notice
to file objections on exclusion from the Electoral
List. It must be shown that the concerned Chief
Executive has prepared and sent notice to the
affected members. The Public Notice dated
8.11.20211 does not meet these requirements. In
This Public Notice reads as follows:
¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: r Dgï ªÉÊ: Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï.JA.J.©.¹.Dgï-
16/2018- 19 ¢£ÁAPÀ 16.11.2018 gÀAvÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÀÄAqÀå f¯Éè, ªÀÄAqÀågÀªÀgÄÀ
¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄݪÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D£ÀĪÉÆâ¹ £ÉÆAzÁ¬Ä¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ '©' vÀgÀUÀw gÉÊvÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃj£À
ªÀÄÄR¨É¯É gÀÆ.1000.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ ¨Á§Ä gÀÆ.100.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÁzÀ vÀªÀÄä µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ
ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ.90.00UÀ¼ÄÀ
¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ590,00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ
gÀÆ.100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ. ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ900.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
fact, it is admitted on behalf of the respondents
that there are deficiencies in the preparation of
the Final Electoral Roll after the publication of
the Draft Eligible Electoral List, and the petitioners
have not been issued with individual notices.
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shri Sant
Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj)
Sahakari Dugha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v.
State of Maharashtra and Others supra has held as
follows:
'7. A perusal of the Rules discloses that the
preparation of provisional list of voters, filing of
objection against the provisional list of voters,
consideration of the objection by the Collector and
finalising the list of voters, all occur in the Rules
which cover the entire process of the election. The
Rules framed for election of specified societies are
complete code in itself providing for the entire
process of election beginning from the stage of
preparation of the provisional voters list, decision
on the objection by the Collector, finalisation of
electoral rolls, holding of election and declaration
of result of the election. In view of the scheme of
the Act and Rules, the preparation of voters' list
must be held to be part of the election process for
constituting managing committee of a specified
society.
12. In view of our finding that
preparation of the electoral roll is being an
intermediate stage in the process of election of
EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ¸ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ 100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ 1000.00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ:11.12.2021 gÉƼÀUÉ
¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ ¥ÁªÀw¸ÀĪÀAvÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÀÄUÉ w½¹zÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ EzÀ®èzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ
¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀÄ£ÀÄ 1959gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 20(2) (J4) ºÁUÀÆ (J5)gÀrAiÀÄ°è£À CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼ÀAvÉAiÀÄÆ
CºÀðvÉAiÀÄÆ ºÉÆA¢gÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
vÀ¦àzÀ°è ªÀÄÄAzÉ d£ÀªÀj 2022gÀ ªÀiÁºÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉAiÀÄ°gÀĪÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ° ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÀÄvÀ ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¸Àà¢üð¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JA§ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÄÀ UÉ
w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
- 10 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
the managing committee of a specified society
and the election process having been set in
motion, it is well settled that the High Court
should not stay the continuation of the election
process even though there may be some alleged
illegality or breach of rules while preparing the
electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in
question has already been held and the result
thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court,
and once the result of the election is declared, it
would be open to the appellant to challenge the
election of returned candidate, if aggrieved, by
means of an election petition before the election
tribunal.
12. It follows from this decision
that the adjudication of all questions must be as
provided under Section 70(2) of the Co-operative
Societies Act2. However, in the present case the
respondents admit that there are deficiencies in
finalization of Final Electoral List. The petitioners
are admittedly not issued with individual notice as
required under the provisions of Rule13-D (2-A) of
the Co-operative Societies Rules; the petitioners
have now cast their votes in the elections on
70. Disputes which may be referred to Registrar for decision.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being
in force, if any dispute touching the constitution, management, or the
business of a co-operative society arises,--
(a) xxxxxxxxx
(2). For the purposes of sub-section (1), the following shall be
deemed to be disputes touching the constitution, management or
the business of a co-operative society, namely:--
(a). XXXXXXXXXXX
(b). XXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c). any dispute arising in connection with the election of a
President, Vice- president, Chairman, Vice-chairman,
Secretary, Treasurer or Member of Committee of the
society.
- 11 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
23.04.2022; the petitioners are not given the
opportunity to show cause against the allegations
that they have created documents. The
respondents, despite admitting deficiencies in
finalisation of the Final Electoral List, want to
invoke the rule of alternative remedy. This Court is
of the considered view that, in the peculiarities of
this case, the writ petitions should be disposed of
with directions to the concerned respondent to
announce results counting even the votes cast by
the petitioners and with liberty to all the concerned
to avail remedy under Section 70(2) of the Act if
aggrieved by the results. If such remedy is availed
raising a dispute, exclusion of votes of those
petitioners who are guilty of fraud can also be
considered based on the material that will be placed
on record.
Therefore, writ petitions are disposed of
calling upon the Returning Officer [the fourth
respondent/sixth respondent in the respective
petitions] to announce the result forthwith including
the votes cast by the petitioners in both the
petitions. All the contentions are left open for
consideration in appropriate proceedings, if
commenced."
2. Learned counsel would submit that, if the same
order is passed, it would suffice in this case also.
3. In that light, the writ petition is disposed calling
upon the respondent - Returning Officer to announce the
result forthwith including the votes cast by the petitioners.
- 12 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3487
All the contentions are left open for consideration in
appropriate proceedings, if commenced.
Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA)
JUDGE
KGK
